Re: Proposed Features for Launchpad Bugs 3.0 - call for help!

2008-08-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:45:51 -0300 Christian Robottom Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:38:02PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: The list Reinhard discussed with you was related to Bugs. I've taken your second bits of feedback into account for our global priorities, but

Re: Proposed Features for Launchpad Bugs 3.0 - call for help!

2008-08-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:03:24 +0200 Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The list Reinhard discussed with you was related to Bugs. I've taken your second bits of feedback into account for our global priorities, but signed PPAs were also his #1 pick

Re: Proposed Features for Launchpad Bugs 3.0 - call for help!

2008-08-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:43:24 +0200 Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christian Robottom Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A final note to MOTU specifically following upon the varied feedback point I made above. We really do want your feedback. However, it makes /my/ work much less

Re: Proposed Features for Launchpad Bugs 3.0 - call for help!

2008-08-24 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:38:02PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: The list Reinhard discussed with you was related to Bugs. I've taken your second bits of feedback into account for our global priorities, but signed PPAs were also his #1 pick for the Soyuz list, so you're well covered. Was

Re: new package, need review

2008-08-24 Thread Siegfried-Angel
Hi, 2008/8/22 Jose Luis Blanco [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is because you used the version postfix -1 which is associated to Debian. Then, lintian expects you to put unstable as distribution (or stable,etc..). I think you can also use -0ubuntu1 and then use the hardy distribution (or intrepid,

Re: new package, need review

2008-08-24 Thread Kasper Peeters
Indeed, the version should end with -0ubuntu1 and the distribution should be intrepid. Ok, fixed. Ah, that's an interesting one which brings up another question. The 'lie' package is actually only needed during build because the autoconf script checks that this program is installed.

Re: Proposed Features for Launchpad Bugs 3.0 - call for help!

2008-08-24 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 02:41:22AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: I idled in #Launchpad for quite somee time after the latest U/I shuffle. I saw a lot of people show up to complain. I only saw two people (not involved in Launchpad development) speak in favor of it. I've heard a lot of

Re: Proposed Features for Launchpad Bugs 3.0 - call for help!

2008-08-24 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 02:22:55PM -0700, Jonathan Marsden wrote: I'm just a newcomer to the world of Ubuntu development and Launchpad, but I agree 100%. When 'ordinary' pages in LP say things like: at least 77 queries issued in 7.48 seconds (that was for

Re: Proposed Features for Launchpad Bugs 3.0 - call for help!

2008-08-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:28:02 -0300 Christian Robottom Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 02:41:22AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: I idled in #Launchpad for quite somee time after the latest U/I shuffle. I saw a lot of people show up to complain. I only saw two people (not

Re: Proposed Features for Launchpad Bugs 3.0 - call for help!

2008-08-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:11:01 -0300 Christian Robottom Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 06:04:21PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: Personally, I think the user feedback that I'm seeing is very clear. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to match up with what is already decided so

Re: Proposed Features for Launchpad Bugs 3.0 - call for help!

2008-08-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:23:06 -0300 Christian Robottom Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On the other hand, the feedback I get, despite me asking otherwise, doesn't really give me much to work on -- there is too much talking down our process, where what I am looking for is more encouraging feedback.

Re: Proposed Features for Launchpad Bugs 3.0 - call for help!

2008-08-24 Thread Sarah Hobbs
Scott Kitterman wrote: On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:23:06 -0300 Christian Robottom Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On the other hand, the feedback I get, despite me asking otherwise, doesn't really give me much to work on -- there is too much talking down our process, where what I am looking for is

Re: Proposed Features for Launchpad Bugs 3.0 - call for help!

2008-08-24 Thread Christian Robottom Reis
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 06:04:21PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: Personally, I think the user feedback that I'm seeing is very clear. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to match up with what is already decided so it will likely be discounted and ignored. Nothing is decided. We're only now

yatm_0.6.orig.tar.gz

2008-08-24 Thread Daan Hoogland
Due to my lack of knowledge of Linux I do not manage to get this program up-and-running. My Linux OS is Ubuntu 8.04.1 LTS Desktop Edition. Can you help me with it? Thank you very much in advance, kind regards, Daniel -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or