Hi there,
I am looking to submit a patch for the atftp server and am wondering
what the process involves (or where i can go to find out).
I also have had no luck at all in trying to find any sort of CVS
repository for this package.
How do i submit a patch?
Thanks,
Nick Weedon
--
Ubuntu-motu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Weedon schrieb:
I am looking to submit a patch for the atftp server and am wondering
what the process involves (or where i can go to find out).
I also have had no luck at all in trying to find any sort of CVS
repository for this package.
Another issue that is not addressed in your response is the version naming.
You uploaded something called a release candidate that was not, in fact a
release candidate. Based on the dialogue in the bug, it seems clear to me
that you knew it was a Git snapshot. Additionally, it appears to me
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008, Mathias Gug wrote:
1. sudo apt-get install rubygems
2. sudo gem install rails
3. Modify the default PATH in the environment to include
/var/lib/gems/1.X/bin/ so that the rails command can be invoked from the
command line.
The upload aims at removing step
Hi Loïc,
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 07:17:29PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008, Mathias Gug wrote:
1. sudo apt-get install rubygems
2. sudo gem install rails
3. Modify the default PATH in the environment to include
/var/lib/gems/1.X/bin/ so that the rails command can
On 01/09/08 at 12:21 -0400, Mathias Gug wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to appeal against motu-release decision to revert the
libgem-ruby upload 1.3.0~RC1really1.2.0-2ubuntu2 based on the following
reasons:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:39:52PM +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote:
first off, this was not an
Hi Matthias,
On Monday 01 September 2008 20:27:27 Mathias Gug wrote:
Hi Stefan,
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 08:04:06PM +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote:
On Monday 01 September 2008 18:21:53 Mathias Gug wrote:
Oh, one thing that hasn't been discussed by motu-release is actually the
effect on the
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008, Mathias Gug wrote:
This was indeed suggested at the very beginning of the bug thread [1] by
using /etc/profile.d/. However it was rejected on the following grounds
[2]
I'm not quite sure I agree with the rationale; I agree it's a good
policy that programs /installed by
Minutes of motu-release meeting, Friday 29th August, 11.00 UTC.
motu-release members present (4/4):
* Cesare Tirabassi (norsetto)
* Scott Kitterman (ScottK)
* Luke Yelavich (TheMuso)
* Stefan Potyra (sistpoty|work)
Present on invitation:
* Luca Falavigna (DktrKranz)
Relationship between
Hi,
On Monday 01 September 2008 23:33:40 Stefan Potyra wrote:
[..]
- Kubuntu: Jonathan Ridell (Ridell)
- Mythbuntu: Mario Limonciello (superm1)
- Xubuntu: Code Sommerville (code-sommerville)
ahem, mea culpa, Cody, for getting your name/nick wrong.
- Mozilla Team: Alexander Sack (asac)
-
Stefan Potyra wrote:
Delegations:
All motu-release members were very much in favour to once again have
delegates
handling relevant subsets of packages.
The following flavors have been agreed on to be handled by the following
delegates:
- Ubuntu Studio: _MMA_
Man. I feel loved.
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 23:42:39 +0200 Stefan Potyra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 01 September 2008 23:33:40 Stefan Potyra wrote:
[..]
- Kubuntu: Jonathan Ridell (Ridell)
- Mythbuntu: Mario Limonciello (superm1)
- Xubuntu: Code Sommerville (code-sommerville)
ahem, mea culpa, Cody, for
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 23:33:40 +0200 Stefan Potyra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Minutes of motu-release meeting, Friday 29th August, 11.00 UTC.
motu-release members present (4/4):
* Cesare Tirabassi (norsetto)
* Scott Kitterman (ScottK)
* Luke Yelavich (TheMuso)
* Stefan Potyra (sistpoty|work)
Present
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 08:47:15PM +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote:
In this regard, I'd like to bring your attention however to [1],
without further comments. [1]: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/revu1-
incoming/passenger-0808222010/passenger-2.0.3/debian/postinst
While this file is there because it's
Soren Hansen wrote:
As much as I dislike upstream tarballs shipping debian directories, I
really don't approve much of the practice of repacking tarballs just for
that reason.
If I find something that claims to be the original tarball of passenger
2.0.3 (by having a filename such as
15 matches
Mail list logo