Re: Sound Driver for 5.1 channel

2009-06-12 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
2009/6/12 supravat paul supravatpaul_su...@yahoo.co.in: Hi, I've got Gigabyte S-series  motherboard (Intel 945 chipset) which supports 5.1 channel sound system. But it is not working in Ubuntu 9.04. It is not detecting the system at all. Basically the sound driver is of Realtek. Please help

Suggest removal of gtkrsync from karmic

2009-06-12 Thread Andreas Heinlein
Hello, I'd like to suggest removing the package gtkrsync from karmic. Gtkrsync is a graphical frontend to rsync, but requires rsync = 2.6 to work. Since the upgrade of rsync to 3.0 with intrepid (or hardy-backports), gtkrsync is broken. See

Re: Audacity Package for Ubuntu / Debian

2009-06-12 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Adrian Knoth schrieb: Fedora, Mandriva, Opensuse and the lot all ship the 1.3 series. Debian's surely not heading backwards and confuse the users with re-introducing and old version, which would mean that all community hints in the forums wouldn't apply to Debian's version, cause we're not

Stephen Stalcup (vorian) re-joined the MOTU team

2009-06-12 Thread Daniel Holbach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello everybody, please give Stephen a warm welcome to the team, where he's continue to work on KDE packages and sponsoring. Have a great day, Daniel -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla

Nick Ellery (nellery) is a MOTU

2009-06-12 Thread Daniel Holbach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello everybody, we're very pleased to welcome a new member to the MOTU team: Nick Ellery. Nick has been working a lot on merging changes from Debian and lowering the delta between Debian and Ubuntu. Please give him a warm welcome to the team! Have

Maintainer/XSBC-Original-Maintainer in Ubuntu packages

2009-06-12 Thread Morten Kjeldgaard
Hi, I would like us to discuss the merit of the XSBC-Orignal-Maintainer: policy for -0ubuntu* packages in Ubuntu Universe. These are packages that have been introduced into Ubuntu somehow, either through REVU or an upstream-upgrade via a MOTU. This post concerns that type of packages, NOT merged

Re: Maintainer/XSBC-Original-Maintainer in Ubuntu packages

2009-06-12 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk writes: Currently, we put the email address of this mailing list in the maintainer field. That is redundant, because the Maintainer: field of all packages in universe then is identical. It contributes no information other than what is already known by the

Re: Maintainer/XSBC-Original-Maintainer in Ubuntu packages

2009-06-12 Thread Stephan Hermann
Moins, On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:57:49 +0200 Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk wrote: Hi, I would like us to discuss the merit of the XSBC-Orignal-Maintainer: policy for -0ubuntu* packages in Ubuntu Universe. These are packages that have been introduced into Ubuntu somehow, either

Re: Maintainer/XSBC-Original-Maintainer in Ubuntu packages

2009-06-12 Thread Morten Kjeldgaard
Reinhard Tartler wrote: I disagree here a bit. Some of the package I maintain are being maintained in a team on alioth. Most prominent teams here are pkg-wpa and pkg-multimedia. I leave the alioth mailing list in the maintainer field to indicate where the maintainers can be reached. I am not

Re: Maintainer/XSBC-Original-Maintainer in Ubuntu packages

2009-06-12 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk writes: Reinhard Tartler wrote: I disagree here a bit. Some of the package I maintain are being maintained in a team on alioth. Most prominent teams here are pkg-wpa and pkg-multimedia. I leave the alioth mailing list in the maintainer field to indicate

Re: Maintainer/XSBC-Original-Maintainer in Ubuntu packages

2009-06-12 Thread Morten Kjeldgaard
Stephan Hermann wrote: Moins, Moins to you too! My packages have Maintainer: MOTU and XSBC-Orig-Maintainer: insert my realname + email addr. as an example. Yes, that is the way most REVU contributors also do it. I do take care of them (depending on Time and Priority of usage of the

Re: Maintainer/XSBC-Original-Maintainer in Ubuntu packages

2009-06-12 Thread Stephan Hermann
Moins, On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:04:52 +0200 Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk wrote: Stephan Hermann wrote: My packages have Maintainer: MOTU and XSBC-Orig-Maintainer: insert my realname + email addr. as an example. Yes, that is the way most REVU contributors also do it. I do take

Re: Maintainer/XSBC-Original-Maintainer in Ubuntu packages

2009-06-12 Thread Charlie Smotherman
[snip} As of today we have 861 universe packages that are maintained in Ubuntu (*). We _can_ use some help with those! So where can someone find a list of these 861 packages that need love and affection? Best regards Charlie Smotherman signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: Reproducible w3m bug

2009-06-12 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote on 08/06/09 20:58: ... Should package that are in Universe and unmaintained[1] show that in Launchpad and _suggest_ the user to upstream them? I understand that _not_ all user will know/want to do that, but at least it

Re: Maintainer/XSBC-Original-Maintainer in Ubuntu packages

2009-06-12 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il giorno Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:57:49 +0200 Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk ha scritto: I think the XSBC-Original-Maintainer field doesn't work as intended, and that the field Maintainer field is redundant. XSBC-Original-Maintainer was introduced during Dapper development cycle after a

Re: Nick Ellery (nellery) is a MOTU

2009-06-12 Thread Evan R. Murphy
2009/6/12 Daniel Holbach daniel.holb...@ubuntu.com: [...] Hello everybody, we're very pleased to welcome a new member to the MOTU team: Nick Ellery. Nick has been working a lot on merging changes from Debian and lowering the delta between Debian and Ubuntu. Please give him a warm welcome to

Re: Maintainer/XSBC-Original-Maintainer in Ubuntu packages

2009-06-12 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il giorno Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:04:52 +0200 Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk ha scritto: Maintainer: Morten Kjeldgaard (https://launchpad.net/~mok0) Soyuz would complain about wrong email address format and reject upload. What you want could be addressed using a pseudo-header (I invent a name

Re: Maintainer/XSBC-Original-Maintainer in Ubuntu packages

2009-06-12 Thread Stefan Potyra
Hi Luca, Am Friday 12 June 2009 23:05:32 schrieb Luca Falavigna: Il giorno Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:04:52 +0200 Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk ha scritto: Maintainer: Morten Kjeldgaard (https://launchpad.net/~mok0) Soyuz would complain about wrong email address format and reject upload.

Re: Stephen Stalcup (vorian) re-joined the MOTU team

2009-06-12 Thread Evan R. Murphy
2009/6/12 Daniel Holbach daniel.holb...@ubuntu.com: [...] Hello everybody, please give Stephen a warm welcome to the team, where he's continue to work on KDE packages and sponsoring. Have a great day,  Daniel [...] Congratulations on your membership, Stephen. Regards, Evan R. Murphy --

Re: Maintainer/XSBC-Original-Maintainer in Ubuntu packages

2009-06-12 Thread Evan R. Murphy
2009/6/12 Stephan Hermann s...@sourcecode.de: [...] We need more people, we need fresh blood, we need new people, who will stay for more then only a release cycle. [...] I aspire to be a new person around for more than one release cycle! :) (Pardon the noise, I just couldn't resist chiming in

Re: Maintainer/XSBC-Original-Maintainer in Ubuntu packages

2009-06-12 Thread Scott Kitterman
Hi Luca, Am Friday 12 June 2009 23:05:32 schrieb Luca Falavigna: Il giorno Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:04:52 +0200 Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk ha scritto: Maintainer: Morten Kjeldgaard (https://launchpad.net/~mok0) Soyuz would complain about wrong email address format and reject upload.

Re: Maintainer/XSBC-Original-Maintainer in Ubuntu packages

2009-06-12 Thread Morten Kjeldgaard
On 12/06/2009, at 19.11, Charlie Smotherman wrote: [snip} As of today we have 861 universe packages that are maintained in Ubuntu (*). We _can_ use some help with those! So where can someone find a list of these 861 packages that need love and affection? I used the number from