Re: How to put our new package (for free) into Karmic 9.10

2009-07-27 Thread Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
Hi Ilgis Ilgis Ibragimov wrote: > One small question regarding to our package. We have it right now as > sources, and we can provide as sources. However, it is highly desirable > to build many (about 10) different libraries for different platforms, > for example: > 1. CPU AMD 32bit, > 2. CPU AMD 6

Re: How to put our new package (for free) into Karmic 9.10

2009-07-27 Thread Max Bowsher
Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) wrote: > Hi Ilgis > > Ilgis Ibragimov wrote: >> One small question regarding to our package. We have it right now as >> sources, and we can provide as sources. However, it is highly desirable >> to build many (about 10) different libraries for different platforms, >>

Re: How to put our new package (for free) into Karmic 9.10

2009-07-27 Thread Ilgis Ibragimov
Hi, thank you for your kind answers. Please, see my answer below. Max Bowsher wrote: > Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) wrote: > >> Hi Ilgis >> >> Ilgis Ibragimov wrote: >> >>> One small question regarding to our package. We have it right now as >>> sources, and we can provide as sources. Ho

Re: How to put our new package (for free) into Karmic 9.10

2009-07-27 Thread Christopher James Halse Rogers
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 12:10 +0200, Ilgis Ibragimov wrote: > Hi, > > thank you for your kind answers. Please, see my answer below. > > Max Bowsher wrote: > > Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) wrote: > > > > > Hi Ilgis > > > > > > Ilgis Ibragimov wrote: > > > > > > > One small question regard

Re: otrs 2.4?

2009-07-27 Thread Ben Ventura
It was just released on 7/22 so it's pretty new. It has a really good new feature, a wysiwyg email editor that my customer support team really want to get their hands on. It is mostly that new feature that I was after. Ben On Jul 25, 2009, at 4:09 AM, Caroline Ford wrote: We get our ot

Improving process of MOTU SRU requests that are no change rebuilds

2009-07-27 Thread Cody A.W. Somerville
Hello Folks, I'd like to discuss possibly modifying the MOTU SRU process to allow a wider group of individuals the ability to approve MOTU SRU requests that are simply no change rebuilds. From my experience on the motu-sru team, I've made a few observations: ~99.99% of rebuild requests pose minim

Re: Improving process of MOTU SRU requests that are no change rebuilds

2009-07-27 Thread Steve Stalcup
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Cody A.W. Somerville wrote: >  So in the spirit of making life easier for everyone, I'd like to propose > allowing all MOTUs the ability to approve SRU requests that are no change > rebuilds. Optionally, we could also require that the MOTU approving must not > be

Re: Improving process of MOTU SRU requests that are no change rebuilds

2009-07-27 Thread Nick Ellery
Steve Stalcup wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Cody A.W. > Somerville wrote: > >> So in the spirit of making life easier for everyone, I'd like to propose >> allowing all MOTUs the ability to approve SRU requests that are no change >> rebuilds. Optionally, we could also require that the

vlc: Fix two uninitialized variables in the v4l2 access module

2009-07-27 Thread Alina Friedrichsen
Hi, can you please add the following patch? http://git.videolan.org/gitweb.cgi/vlc.git/?a=commit;h=288f193ab03076ddcf895562717a186893230d3a Without it my analog TV card (TerraTec Grabby) doesn't work. Regards Alina -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or u

Re: Improving process of MOTU SRU requests that are no change rebuilds

2009-07-27 Thread Steve Kowalik
Cody A.W. Somerville wrote: > I'd like to discuss possibly modifying the MOTU SRU process to allow a > wider group of individuals the ability to approve MOTU SRU requests that are > simply no change rebuilds. From my experience on the motu-sru team, I've > made a few observations: ~99.99% of rebui