Hiya all,
Thanks to Emmet for raising these important issues.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:53:09PM +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
Fellow MOTU,
During the Jaunty UDS, discussions of Archive Reorganisation (0)
indicated that MOTU would be no more, and all of us should have
received a request for
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 14:06 +, Iain Lane wrote:
iii) MOTU SWAT needs help, especially as it moves from universe to
unseeded packages. I believe that extended discussion is worthwhile
between the MOTU SWAT team and the Ubuntu Security team to determine
if all security efforts could follow
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 12:53 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
iii) MOTU SWAT needs help, especially as it moves from universe to
unseeded packages. I believe that extended discussion is worthwhile
between the MOTU SWAT team and the Ubuntu Security team to determine
if all security efforts could
Jamie Strandboge wrote:
Emmet Hikory wrote:
iii) MOTU SWAT needs help, especially as it moves from universe to
unseeded packages. I believe that extended discussion is worthwhile
between the MOTU SWAT team and the Ubuntu Security team to determine
if all security efforts could follow a
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 08:46 -0600, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
So far, we've been doing all review as well
as publication, but MOTU-SWAT can get involved in the review process
which is really the most important part
Correction-- the *most* important part is someone doing updates,
followed by
On 22/02/10 15:06, Iain Lane wrote:
Hiya all,
Thanks to Emmet for raising these important issues.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:53:09PM +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
Fellow MOTU,
During the Jaunty UDS, discussions of Archive Reorganisation (0)
indicated that MOTU would be no more, and all of us
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 00:28 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
Due to limitations in Launchpad, MOTU-SWAT still needs to be a separate
team from ubuntu-security (this is due to the ubuntu-security PPA
containing embargoed items and the fact that you must be a member of
ubuntu-security to publish
Jamie Strandboge wrote:
Emmet Hikory wrote:
As Archive Reorganisation moves forward, and components go away
entirely, I expect this becomes even more complicated, but I still
think that it is handled better by an integrated ubuntu-security team
(perhaps with only a subset authorised to
