Howdy MOTU friends!
I'm seeking clarification on an Ubuntu policy, as it relates to MOTU.
My long standing interpretation of MOTU policies is that all Ubuntu
MOTUs are trusted to upload new packages to Ubuntu Universe.
Those uploads are processed (accepted, rejected) by the Ubuntu Archive
of the week, I will assume that
nobody cares about the remaining packages and will start filing removal
requests for them.
Please don't remove mongodb, per above ;-)
Thanks,
--
:-Dustin
Dustin Kirkland
Ubuntu Core Developer
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Bryce Harrington br...@canonical.com wrote:
For improving the process just for the skill-level consideration, what I
would like to see is sort of a self-directed exercise workbook, with
sets of packaging, bug triage, testing, documentation, etc. tasks. For
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
I completely agree. MOTU and core-dev membership is a combination of
* technical knowledge [for which two key points apply: arbitrary
have-done-X metrics don't assess any more reliably than peer assessment
of the
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Jordan Mantha jordan.man...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think that's necessarily a logical conclusion. You're saying
that if the +1/-1 of a MOTU Council member is based on a subjective
decision that they can't use objective data in making that decision.
That is
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Daniel Holbach
daniel.holb...@ubuntu.com wrote:
We feel that these changes are going to be a notable improvement and we
would like to hear your thoughts on them, so we can move to the new
format real soon now.
Hi Daniel (and MOTU Council)-
Thank you very much
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Mathias Gug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 04:04:57PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
No, I mean that it's not a policy violation to try to add the gem
binary path to PATH on a best effort basis because packages will
continue to work whether PATH
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008, either Michael Bienia or Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Perhaps it was not so well communicated in the past else there wouldn't
be the confusion leading to that mail. At that time I thought that one
had to be a MOTU before one could apply for core-dev.
According to the diagram
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Brian Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[0] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Checklist
Excellent information there, Brian.
Two comments.
First, I'd suggest that Launchpad's Help tab in the top left corner
of bug pages point to this wiki page (perhaps among others
