On 24/01/2009, at 05.44, Marcelo Boveto Shima wrote:
I have been maintainining the FreeNX complete suite for at least 2
years
and now I uploaded it to revu.
I've reviewed this package when it was uploaded under the name nx
and before it was split.
In the comments, I asked you to clarify
On 23/01/2009, at 08.00, Jordan Mantha wrote:
Is there an easy way that we can include a description of packages in
the REVU emails? I really like seeing what's new from REVU but I'm
always a little disappointed when I look at the email and I can't find
any idea of what the package is. Even
On 19/10/2008, at 00.25, Caroline Ford wrote:
Having them in malone makes them easier to link to the Debian request
- and we can see if the status changes in the Debian bug. This means
it is easier to see if the request has been satisfied.
Agreed. We have our stuff scattered all over the
On 23/01/2009, at 00.30, Nathan Handler wrote:
For those of you who might be unaware, I have taken over Siegfried
Gevatter's (RainCT) role of REVU Coordinator. For the past few days, I
have been thinking about something, and I want to get the opinions of
the rest of the people in the
Loïc, Nathan,
It is in principle possible to transform REVU into a super-
sophisticated package-analysis machine that would extend Lintian's
capabilities and it is even in principle possible that virtually error-
free packages would result.
The point is, it doesn't solve our problem, because
On 23/01/2009, at 18.17, Jordan Mantha wrote:
... a long post with points that I agree with and others that I don't.
A very good outset for discussion! Just a short comment on one of
your points, Jordan:
1) New contributors are not to be encouraged to package from scratch.
If somebody
Hi MOTUs,
It's Friday, Jan 23, 2009 and it's REVU day!
We need all MOTUs on deck! A similar plea was sent out last week, but
to not much avail. We really need MOTUs to go and make at least one
review. This week we have ~128 packages waiting for review. That's an
increase of 15% in a week!
Hi MOTUs,
We are already well into REVU day, and we have 100 entries sitting
in the queue waiting for a review. You may not think that reviewing is
the most sexy MOTU task, but as long as we refer newcomers to REVU, we
owe it to the community to review uploads. Each upload deserves at
On 12/01/2009, at 05.10, Jonathan Marsden wrote:
Also, I think adding a table of contents to the page would be good (I
just did this!).
Great, that makes it easier to get back to the section you are working
on! Ideally, I would have liked some kind of check-box for every
exercise that
On 12/01/2009, at 10.45, Geerd HF Diercksen wrote:
/var/cache/apt/archives/xtide-wvs1-data_20020219-0ubuntu1_all.deb:
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/xtide-wvs/wvs1.dat', which is also in
package xtide-coastline.
xtide-coastline is a package from Debian with the same content as
Hi,
I volunteer to draft a new GettingStarted page, and I will collect
with
gratitude any contributions from this list or otherwise.
Excellent.
I'm happy to review, improve and discuss. The only thing I'd like
MOTU/GettingStarted to be is
- a concise landing page
- that links to all
Hi all, this is a long-ish post, but I hope you will enjoy it.
The other night I was discussing with persia, apachelogger and
norsetto on #ubuntu-motu, where they were using their awesome MOTU
powers to demolish my poor little theseus package.
While apachelogger was disassembling and
On 08/11/2007, at 11.58, Emmet Hikory wrote:
Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
Another thing is that experienced non-MOTUs should be able to review
packages, which would help the flow through the pipeline, and also
help
the MOTO-hopeful getting more experience.
I'd like to advocate the use
We have a lot of contributors in this list, and I think it is the
right
time for them to speak up and share their thoughts. We need you guys,
and we need to know if what we do is valid or not. PLEASE ADD YOUR
VOICE!
As a new contributor, let me add a few comments, then.
As it has been
Emmet Hikory wrote:
The xinetd license is GPL-incompatible, and the current
distributed version may not be in compliance (I'm not an expert, but I
believe there are patches in place without accompanying documentation
in COPYING). While the featureset is great, this may not be the best
Depends: netbase, netkit-inetd | inetd, update-inetd | xinetd,
vmware-server-kernel-modules...
When you try to install the package on the system with xinetd (most
Ubuntu systems) the apt-get needs to remove xinetd and want to replace
it with xinetd.
Inetd should be removed from the
16 matches
Mail list logo
