On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Bryce Harrington br...@canonical.com wrote:
For improving the process just for the skill-level consideration, what I
would like to see is sort of a self-directed exercise workbook, with
sets of packaging, bug triage, testing, documentation, etc. tasks. For
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
I completely agree. MOTU and core-dev membership is a combination of
* technical knowledge [for which two key points apply: arbitrary
have-done-X metrics don't assess any more reliably than peer assessment
of the
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Dustin Kirkland kirkl...@ubuntu.comwrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
I completely agree. MOTU and core-dev membership is a combination of
* technical knowledge [for which two key points apply: arbitrary
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:28:25 -0400 Cody A.W. Somerville
cody-somervi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I agree. In the same spirit of having a workbook, we could set guidelines
and not hard fast rules. If we're going to have a workbook, we're setting
some numbers anyhow.
We aren't and we shouldn't.
The
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Dustin Kirkland kirkl...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
I completely agree. MOTU and core-dev membership is a combination of
* technical knowledge [for which two key points apply: arbitrary
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Dustin Kirkland kirkl...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Jordan Mantha jordan.man...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't think that's necessarily a logical conclusion. You're saying
that if the +1/-1 of a MOTU Council member is based on a subjective
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Jordan Mantha jordan.man...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think that's necessarily a logical conclusion. You're saying
that if the +1/-1 of a MOTU Council member is based on a subjective
decision that they can't use objective data in making that decision.
That is
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Bryce Harrington br...@canonical.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 11:04:35AM -0800, Jordan Mantha wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Dustin Kirkland kirkl...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Jordan Mantha jordan.man...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 11:04:35AM -0800, Jordan Mantha wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Dustin Kirkland kirkl...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Jordan Mantha jordan.man...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't think that's necessarily a logical conclusion. You're saying
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 13:22, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Dustin Kirkland schrieb:
I really believe the MOTU and Core-Dev application processes would
greatly benefit from some minimal, objective criteria. It should be
perfectly clear that meeting these objective criteria will not be
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 02:18:09PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 13:22, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Dustin Kirkland schrieb:
I really believe the MOTU and Core-Dev application processes would
greatly benefit from some minimal, objective criteria. It should be
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 14:18 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
People like quantitative criteria because they can be applied without
judgement and with no perception of bias. Everyone has to wait 6
months, so
it's not unfair we say you need to wait too. I really think that
our
process is
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 13:46 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
For improving the process just for the skill-level consideration, what
I
would like to see is sort of a self-directed exercise workbook, with
sets of packaging, bug triage, testing, documentation, etc. tasks.
For
sponsorees with
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 07:44:16PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 19:24, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 13:46 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
For improving the process just for the skill-level consideration, what
I
would like to see is sort of a
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 13:22, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Dustin Kirkland schrieb:
I really believe the MOTU and Core-Dev application processes would
greatly benefit from some minimal, objective criteria. It should be
perfectly clear that meeting these objective
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 08:59:24PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 20:46, Bryce Harrington wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 07:44:16PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 19:24, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 13:46 -0800, Bryce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Kitterman schrieb:
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 20:46, Bryce Harrington wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 07:44:16PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Here's a good list of questions for the workbook:
17 matches
Mail list logo
