On 12/06/2009, at 23.05, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk ha scritto:
Maintainer: Morten Kjeldgaard (https://launchpad.net/~mok0)
Soyuz would complain about wrong email address format and reject
upload.
I realize that Soyuz at the moment probably would not
Unrelated to the main discussion of this topic...
2009/6/14 Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk:
I realize that Soyuz at the moment probably would not accept a URL.
However, it DOES recognize various email addresses and translate those
to Launchpad teams or people. I have put my ubuntu.com
Il giorno Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:21:21 +0200
Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk ha scritto:
There will still be two fields, one for MOTU and one for the
packager, exactly like now, only the packager's field would not be
his/her private email, but a link to their Launchpad account. PLUS
the
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 23:29 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
* when processing NEW packages (excluding the ones from Debian, just
consider our local Ubuntu packages), matched LP ID becomes bug
contact immediately (there's no need for the package to leave NEW to
become a bug contact).
2009/6/14 James Westby jw+deb...@jameswestby.net:
When you upload a new package you can ask the person you uploaded it
for to subscribe to the bug mail then and there. If they don't do even
this simple thing then will force-subscribing them make much of a
difference?
You can't subscribe until
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 00:02 +0200, Siegfried-Angel wrote:
2009/6/14 James Westby jw+deb...@jameswestby.net:
When you upload a new package you can ask the person you uploaded it
for to subscribe to the bug mail then and there. If they don't do even
this simple thing then will
2009/6/15 James Westby jw+deb...@jameswestby.net:
That's not true. The record is created the moment that the package hits
the queue.
Oh well, it's been some time since I last checked :).
Sorry for the confusion then.
--
Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT)
Ubuntu Developer. Debian
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 00:27 +0200, Siegfried-Angel wrote:
2009/6/15 James Westby jw+deb...@jameswestby.net:
That's not true. The record is created the moment that the package hits
the queue.
Oh well, it's been some time since I last checked :).
Sorry for the confusion then.
No problem.
Hi,
I would like us to discuss the merit of the XSBC-Orignal-Maintainer:
policy for -0ubuntu* packages in Ubuntu Universe.
These are packages that have been introduced into Ubuntu somehow, either
through REVU or an upstream-upgrade via a MOTU. This post concerns that
type of packages, NOT merged
Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk writes:
Currently, we put the email address of this mailing list in the
maintainer field. That is redundant, because the Maintainer: field of
all packages in universe then is identical. It contributes no
information other than what is already known by the
Moins,
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:57:49 +0200
Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk wrote:
Hi,
I would like us to discuss the merit of the XSBC-Orignal-Maintainer:
policy for -0ubuntu* packages in Ubuntu Universe.
These are packages that have been introduced into Ubuntu somehow,
either
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I disagree here a bit. Some of the package I maintain are being
maintained in a team on alioth. Most prominent teams here are pkg-wpa
and pkg-multimedia. I leave the alioth mailing list in the maintainer
field to indicate where the maintainers can be reached.
I am not
Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk writes:
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I disagree here a bit. Some of the package I maintain are being
maintained in a team on alioth. Most prominent teams here are pkg-wpa
and pkg-multimedia. I leave the alioth mailing list in the maintainer
field to indicate
Stephan Hermann wrote:
Moins,
Moins to you too!
My packages have Maintainer: MOTU and XSBC-Orig-Maintainer:
insert my realname + email addr. as an example.
Yes, that is the way most REVU contributors also do it.
I do take care of them (depending on Time and Priority of usage of the
Moins,
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:04:52 +0200
Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk wrote:
Stephan Hermann wrote:
My packages have Maintainer: MOTU and XSBC-Orig-Maintainer:
insert my realname + email addr. as an example.
Yes, that is the way most REVU contributors also do it.
I do take
[snip}
As of today we have 861 universe packages that are maintained in Ubuntu
(*). We _can_ use some help with those!
So where can someone find a list of these 861 packages that need love
and affection?
Best regards
Charlie Smotherman
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
and others have
done to their packages. Here it makes sense to move the Debian
maintainer to the XSBC-Original-Maintainer: field, and put something
else in the Maintainer field.
What if we drop XSBC-Original-Maintainer for local Ubuntu packages,
leave only Maintainer field and let timestamp line
Il giorno Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:04:52 +0200
Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk ha scritto:
Maintainer: Morten Kjeldgaard (https://launchpad.net/~mok0)
Soyuz would complain about wrong email address format and reject upload.
What you want could be addressed using a pseudo-header (I invent a name
Hi Luca,
Am Friday 12 June 2009 23:05:32 schrieb Luca Falavigna:
Il giorno Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:04:52 +0200
Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk ha scritto:
Maintainer: Morten Kjeldgaard (https://launchpad.net/~mok0)
Soyuz would complain about wrong email address format and reject upload.
2009/6/12 Stephan Hermann s...@sourcecode.de:
[...]
We need more people, we need fresh blood, we need
new people, who will stay for more then only a release cycle.
[...]
I aspire to be a new person around for more than one release cycle! :)
(Pardon the noise, I just couldn't resist chiming in
Hi Luca,
Am Friday 12 June 2009 23:05:32 schrieb Luca Falavigna:
Il giorno Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:04:52 +0200
Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk ha scritto:
Maintainer: Morten Kjeldgaard (https://launchpad.net/~mok0)
Soyuz would complain about wrong email address format and reject upload.
On 12/06/2009, at 19.11, Charlie Smotherman wrote:
[snip}
As of today we have 861 universe packages that are maintained in
Ubuntu
(*). We _can_ use some help with those!
So where can someone find a list of these 861 packages that need love
and affection?
I used the number from
22 matches
Mail list logo
