Re: RFH: python-coherence

2009-03-24 Thread Max Bowsher
Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:53:52 + Max Bowsher wrote: >> Charlie Smotherman wrote: ... >>> >>> My question is what would be the best course of action to correct this >>> now broken package. >> I don't understand, what's the problem with simply treating it the same >> as an

Re: RFH: python-coherence

2009-03-24 Thread Charlie Smotherman
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 09:24 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:53:52 + Max Bowsher wrote: > >Charlie Smotherman wrote: > >> MOTU, > >> > >> I have a little problem that I need some help with. I just update the > >> python-coherence package Bug #338408. As you can tell f

Re: RFH: python-coherence

2009-03-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:53:52 + Max Bowsher wrote: >Charlie Smotherman wrote: >> MOTU, >> >> I have a little problem that I need some help with. I just update the >> python-coherence package Bug #338408. As you can tell from the bug I >> collaborated with the Debian Maintainer to update the

Re: RFH: python-coherence

2009-03-24 Thread Max Bowsher
Charlie Smotherman wrote: > MOTU, > > I have a little problem that I need some help with. I just update the > python-coherence package Bug #338408. As you can tell from the bug I > collaborated with the Debian Maintainer to update the package in Debian > first. During this collaboration I used

RFH: python-coherence

2009-03-23 Thread Charlie Smotherman
MOTU, I have a little problem that I need some help with. I just update the python-coherence package Bug #338408. As you can tell from the bug I collaborated with the Debian Maintainer to update the package in Debian first. During this collaboration I used a bzr branch to keep track of what ch