Stefan Potyra wrote:
Hi Martin,
Am Saturday 31 October 2009 10:57:21 schrieb Martin Pitt:
Stefan Potyra [2009-10-31 2:58 +0100]:
That aside, I find it very interesting and disturbing that membership of
otherwise voted upon boards are (as it occurs to me from this mail)
prolonged
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:22:26 +0100 Daniel Holbach
daniel.holb...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Am Samstag, den 31.10.2009, 13:08 -0400 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
Would you please point me to the minutes of the meetings or the archive
of the discussion where this decision was taken?
It was discussed via
Hi Mark,
Am Monday 02 November 2009 11:00:57 schrieb Mark Shuttleworth:
Stefan Potyra wrote:
Hi Martin,
Am Saturday 31 October 2009 10:57:21 schrieb Martin Pitt:
Stefan Potyra [2009-10-31 2:58 +0100]:
That aside, I find it very interesting and disturbing that membership
of otherwise
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Stefan Potyra
stefan.pot...@informatik.uni-erlangen.de wrote:
Thanks, Mark, that's at least a clear announcement, helping me better
understand how the Ubuntu government works in reality, and to what degree
government bodies value the community.
Stefan, that's
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:00:57 + Mark Shuttleworth m...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
If the CC need to,
we can make direct appointments and replacements on any structure in
Ubuntu, and will do so.
Certainly the CC can (and if they can't you, as SABDFL, can). That doesn't
mean you should.
While the
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Matthew East m...@ubuntu.com wrote:
The CC is predominantly made up of community members. Only 2 out of 8
of its members work for Canonical. Of course we value the community.
P.S. I've just realised that the above could be read as meaning that
the 2 people in
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:00:57 + Mark Shuttleworth m...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
If the CC need to,
we can make direct appointments and replacements on any structure in
Ubuntu, and will do so.
Certainly the CC can (and if they can't you, as SABDFL, can). That
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:05:36 + Matthew East m...@ubuntu.com wrote:
...
In response to Scott's post, I think we can take the point. I don't
think that any lack of transparency here was intentional - it just
seemed to be a very easy decision and it was more or less coincidental
that the people
Hi Mark
Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
Remember, governance in the Ubuntu community is delegated from the CC
(and ultimately me). We believe in having a broad strong base of talent
to handle the huge scale of Ubuntu, but that's not the same as believing
that every decision should be taken in a
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
Personally, I'd be happy if there was a commitment to be more mindful of
working in public when possible in the future.
I suspect that this release cycle will see the archive reorganization in
place. I have seen
On 02/11/2009, at 17.23, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
quote who=Stefan Potyra date=Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 12:43:22PM
+0100
Let's not bog ourselves down in procedural pedantry. If the CC
need to,
we can make direct appointments and replacements on any structure in
Ubuntu, and will do so.
While I don't disagree with the term extension, I would have expected
the MOTU Council to approach the developer community in this matter
and the final decision being taken through a poll (ie. something like
Do you agree with extending Soren and Michael's term?).
In this case, given that the
Am Samstag, den 31.10.2009, 13:08 -0400 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
Would you please point me to the minutes of the meetings or the archive of
the discussion where this decision was taken?
It was discussed via email.
Have a great day,
Daniel
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Am Samstag, den 31.10.2009, 02:58 +0100 schrieb Stefan Potyra:
That aside, I find it very interesting and disturbing that membership of
otherwise voted upon boards are (as it occurs to me from this mail) prolonged
by the will of one developer. Maybe you can clear up what happened? Did that
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:59:15 +0100 Daniel Holbach daniel.holb...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
Am Samstag, den 31.10.2009, 02:58 +0100 schrieb Stefan Potyra:
That aside, I find it very interesting and disturbing that membership of
otherwise voted upon boards are (as it occurs to me from this mail)
Hi Martin,
Am Saturday 31 October 2009 10:57:21 schrieb Martin Pitt:
Stefan Potyra [2009-10-31 2:58 +0100]:
That aside, I find it very interesting and disturbing that membership of
otherwise voted upon boards are (as it occurs to me from this mail)
prolonged by the will of one developer.
Hi,
Am Friday 30 October 2009 17:30:44 schrieb Benj. Mako Hill:
Martin Pitt has apparently recently extended the terms of Søren Hansen
and Michael Bienia by 3 months.
As folks should know by now, there's a recently executed plan to split
developer membership out from the TB into a new
17 matches
Mail list logo
