On 2009-02-21 20:52:47 +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
Oh, I didn't make it quite clear: I imagine that packages uploaded to
the PPA would be the ones that passed reviewing with 2 advocates. So
essentially, these package would be in a state ready for upload to
Ubuntu's archive. I agree
On 22/02/2009, at 12.47, Michael Bienia wrote:
On 2009-02-21 20:52:47 +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
Oh, I didn't make it quite clear: I imagine that packages uploaded to
the PPA would be the ones that passed reviewing with 2 advocates. So
essentially, these package would be in a state
On 22/02/2009, at 04.45, Stefan Potyra wrote:
hm... not too sure: Just adding *all* packages on revu to my pbuilder
environment is something which I feel uncomfortable with.
Personally, I use
mini-dinstall for this task, because it lets me explicitely select
which
package I want to be
Hi MOTUs,
I propose that we establish a PPA staging area for certain packages in
REVU.
There are several reasons why this could be practical:
* At times, uploaders submit library packages, and also have other
packages that depend on that library package uploaded for review. With
the
Hi Morten:
2009/2/21 Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk
Hi MOTUs,
I propose that we establish a PPA staging area for certain packages in
REVU.
In principle I think having an environment that builds packages from revu is
a great idea. Unfortunately, the PPA's in their currently
On 21/02/2009, at 19.51, Mario Limonciello wrote:
What happens when someone needs to make changes without modifying
the build number? REVU allows this, but PPAs explicitly wouldn't
unless you deleted the old build, waited for the publisher to see
the deletion, and reran it. You'd then
Hi Morten,
Am Saturday 21 February 2009 19:32:13 schrieb Morten Kjeldgaard:
Hi MOTUs,
I propose that we establish a PPA staging area for certain packages in
REVU.
There are several reasons why this could be practical:
* At times, uploaders submit library packages, and also have other
