Thank you for quick and clear responses. I will not invest time in this,
after looking at these referenced URLs.
After listening to Ubuntu UK podcast, I decided to offer also help with
qmail package. I appretiate these honest answers.
qmail + OpenBSD spamd is doing great job for me and for my cus
On 2009-10-16 10:37:10 -0400, Steven Harms wrote:
> Do not turn this into a debate about the merits of qmail, that is
> off-topic. You can see the debian report on inclusion here:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510415
And here is the ITP bug for qmail:
http://bugs.debian.o
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:22:50 +0100 Caroline Ford
wrote:
>Is it unmaintained upstream? We don't want a mail client full of
>security holes and bugs. It's not just a "package and go" process.
>
We already have a qmail source package. It is kind of a special case. My
recommendation would be to
Do not turn this into a debate about the merits of qmail, that is
off-topic. You can see the debian report on inclusion here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510415
sharms
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Caroline Ford
wrote:
> Is it unmaintained upstream? We don't want a mai
Is it unmaintained upstream? We don't want a mail client full of
security holes and bugs. It's not just a "package and go" process.
Caroline
Sent from a mobile device.
On 16 Oct 2009, at 14:24, Jiri Navratil wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm considering to create qmail package for debian and ubuntu usa
Hello,
I'm considering to create qmail package for debian and ubuntu usage.
I'm using 12 years qmail (compiling from source code) As the owner
changed the licence, now the package can be created.
Could you let me know, if my work can be taken? What I shall read to
understand, how hard is to make
