Stefan Potyra wrote:
If you verify that the clean rule restores the build directory to the
exact state it was in before building, then the package will build
cleanly a second time.
not quite, at leat from a practical POV:
If I run make -f debian/clean, I want the package to be in a state to
On 05/08/08 at 22:42 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 15:41, Phillip Susi wrote:
Nicolas Valcarcel wrote:
Hi!
I've just write a --build-twice-in-a-row feature for pbuilder that
Rather than try to build twice, shouldn't you just make a copy, build,
then run
Nicolas Valcarcel wrote:
Hi!
I've just write a --build-twice-in-a-row feature for pbuilder that
Rather than try to build twice, shouldn't you just make a copy, build,
then run the clean rule and diff with the copy? Even if the package
manages to build a second time after cleaning, that
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 15:41, Phillip Susi wrote:
Nicolas Valcarcel wrote:
Hi!
I've just write a --build-twice-in-a-row feature for pbuilder that
Rather than try to build twice, shouldn't you just make a copy, build,
then run the clean rule and diff with the copy? Even if the
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 04:11:13PM -0400, Nicolas Valcarcel wrote:
I've just write a --build-twice-in-a-row feature for pbuilder that
allows pbuilder users to test if clean work as expected and i need some
testing, so far i have test it and it's working, but i will prefer to
have a
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:16:07 +0100 Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 04:11:13PM -0400, Nicolas Valcarcel wrote:
I've just write a --build-twice-in-a-row feature for pbuilder that
allows pbuilder users to test if clean work as expected and i need some
testing,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Kitterman schrieb:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:16:07 +0100 Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure Debian developers would appreciate the patches to find and fix
these bugs.
He's already sent the patch to Debian's BTS.
Scott: I think
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 07:01:09PM +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Kitterman schrieb:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:16:07 +0100 Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure Debian developers would appreciate the patches to find and fix
these
Hi!
I've just write a --build-twice-in-a-row feature for pbuilder that
allows pbuilder users to test if clean work as expected and i need some
testing, so far i have test it and it's working, but i will prefer to
have a second (or more) opinions on the feature. The new package can be
Nicolas Valcarcel wrote:
I've just write a --build-twice-in-a-row feature for pbuilder that
allows pbuilder users to test if clean work as expected and i need some
testing, so far i have test it and it's working, but i will prefer to
have a second (or more) opinions on the feature. The new
On Sunday 03 August 2008 22:11:13 Nicolas Valcarcel wrote:
Hi!
I've just write a --build-twice-in-a-row feature for pbuilder that
allows pbuilder users to test if clean work as expected and i need some
testing, so far i have test it and it's working, but i will prefer to
have a second
Sounds fair to me, i will change the name of the option to --build-twice
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 14:20 -0700, Jonathan Marsden wrote:
Nicolas Valcarcel wrote:
I've just write a --build-twice-in-a-row feature for pbuilder that
allows pbuilder users to test if clean work as expected and i need
I've changed it for a --twice option so it will end with:
# pbuilder build --twice file.dsc
The patch is on Bug's 254305 report.
0. https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pbuilder/+bug/254305
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 21:26 -0400, Nicolas Valcarcel wrote:
Sounds fair to me, i will change
13 matches
Mail list logo
