On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:43:49 +0530 Bhavani Shankar R bh...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list
I was looking at the merge of directfb [1] and I have a simple doubt
Debian has made their package compatible with dh 7 [2] in which case
is the
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 16:02, Barry deFreese wrote:
Dan Roberts wrote:
I've been wanting to package Code::Blocks in time for fiesty, I'm
currently talking to the devs about this. As it turns out their SVN
repository actually houses more stable code than their last stable
release
On Monday 05 February 2007 13:09, Zach Tibbitts wrote:
Hi,
I'm a developer of an application that's currently in Feisty's universe
repository.
I released a slight update a few weeks ago solely so that it could make it
into Feisty,
and the new version has already shown up in Debian. All
On Saturday 17 March 2007 13:29, Stefan Potyra wrote:
3.) The mentor calls MC to grant him restricted upload rights for a number
of p. MC will nod this through and forwards it to TB. (or the mentor
directly contacts TB, maybe that's easier since the mentor will still be
responsible for what
On Monday 19 March 2007 18:45, Jordan Mantha wrote:
[0] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JordanMantha/Launchpad
I'd suggest adding Malone bug 82745 in malone Not all tagged bugs show up in
when querying by tag [Undecided,Unconfirmed]
https://launchpad.net/bugs/82745 to your list.
Scott K
--
On Monday 02 April 2007 11:19, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Hello everybody,
I thought a bit about Mentoring in MOTU land. What do you think about
having a separate MOTU Mentoring list? I personally don't think that our
mailing list has too high a volume, but I think that more people would
be
On Sunday 22 April 2007 12:28, Lionel Le Folgoc wrote:
* So, how can we improve this?
I think the REVU/wiki page has to be updated, to explicitely say:
When-you-upload-a-package-go-on-#ubuntu-motu-and-cry-and-yell-until-you-ge
t-a-MOTU-to-review-it.
I think that it probably needs more of a
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 12:37, Damian Johnson wrote:
Hi. Apt-get makes a minor mistake in the installation of Electronic Sheep
on Edgy. The .desktop for the gnome screen saver is placed in:
/usr/share/gnome-screensaver/themes/electricsheep.desktop
while it should go in:
This agenda item should probably wait for a meeting that keescook can make it
to (he's offline the rest of this week for travel). I am unable to make
today's meeting either. Here is what I was thinking in case you go ahead and
discuss it:
Dapper and Edgy have clamav 0.8x. Upstream has moved
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 12:25, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
the diskspace on tiber was going a bit low, and as a measure of
precaution I've hacked a litte script to remove uploads older than 12
months:
http://codebrowse.launchpad.net/~revu-hackers/revu/trunk/annotate/siretart%
Since I see python-support 0.6.4 waiting to be merged for Gutsy, I assume we
will have to deal with the egg-info changes sometime in the Gutsy cycle. FYI
in case we have affected packages due to Ubuntu unique changes
Scott K
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: packages
I've decided to try and pick this thread back up.
From the last MOTU meeting I was at, there was some discussion about looking
into the API differences between clamav 0.8x (libclamav1) and 0.9x
(libclamav2). I'm hopelessly unqualified for that job. Who volunteers?
The more I think about
On Thursday 21 June 2007 05:27, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Hello everybody,
I updated some links on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Bugs and
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/TODO already, but it'd be nice if somebody
helped me out with that.
The old links do not work any more due to Bug Status updates.
On Friday 22 June 2007 07:55, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
Hello,
the DEB file has an error in dependency:
Depends: netbase, netkit-inetd | inetd, update-inetd,
vmware-server-kernel-modules...
it should probably read something like
Depends: netbase, netkit-inetd | inetd, update-inetd | xinetd,
Since libode is in Universe, this seemed worth passing on. 0.5 is what we
have in the archives currently. If 0.8 shows up somewhere we ought to be
careful before we synch it/upload it.
Scott K
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: [Python-modules-team] libode ABI breackage
NEW: ccbuild_1.5.5.orig.tar.gz
NEW: ccbuild_1.5.5-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
NEW: ccbuild_1.5.5-0ubuntu1.dsc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:43:30 +0200
Source: ccbuild
Binary: ccbuild
Architecture: source
Version: 1.5.5-0ubuntu1
Distribution: gutsy
On Monday 09 July 2007 11:43, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'd like to draw your attention to
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NewPackageRequirements
There was a quick session with the archive admins today and everybody
said that they were quite pleased with the quality of packages that
NEW: obextool_0.33.orig.tar.gz
NEW: obextool_0.33-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
NEW: obextool_0.33-0ubuntu1.dsc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 00:41:44 +0200
Source: obextool
Binary: obextool
Architecture: source
Version: 0.33-0ubuntu1
Distribution: gutsy
NEW: assogiate_0.2.1.orig.tar.gz
NEW: assogiate_0.2.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
NEW: assogiate_0.2.1-0ubuntu1.dsc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:46:19 +0200
Source: assogiate
Binary: assogiate
Architecture: source
Version: 0.2.1-0ubuntu1
Distribution:
A testing version of python-netcdf has landed in feisty-proposed. To test,
please add:
deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ feisty-proposed universe
to your sources.list(5). Then, update and upgrade (or install) python-netcdf.
NOTE: Sparc isn't built yet, but I'm sending this anyway because
On Thursday 12 July 2007 22:08, Emmet Hikory wrote:
The next MOTU Meeting is scheduled for Saturday, July 14th, 0:00 UTC.
If there are any discussion points or items for decision that you
would like to add to the agenda, please update
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Meetings with your
On Friday 13 July 2007 22:47, Andy Price wrote:
Hi folks,
At the MOTU meeting today it was mentioned that we look into the merges
process. I'm specifically looking into how best to streamline the part
of the process where mergers ping the previous uploaders to check it's
OK to merge the
On Saturday 14 July 2007 00:35, Jordan Mantha wrote:
On Fri Jul 13, 2007 at 11:09:11PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Friday 13 July 2007 22:47, Andy Price wrote:
snip
Right. That's not the problem we've had though. The problem we've had
is people doing merges right away without
On Sunday 15 July 2007 18:21, Michael Bienia wrote:
On 2007-07-15 17:45:37 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:20:16 +0200 Michael Bienia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't know what the best solution for this but it should work for both
main and universe packages
Is there an Ubuntu equivalent of packages.debian.org's web display of each
package's debian/changelog, e.g.:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/python-dns/current/changelog
Scott K
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
On Sunday 15 July 2007 19:16, Soren Hansen wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 07:11:39PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Is there an Ubuntu equivalent of packages.debian.org's web display of
each package's debian/changelog, e.g.:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/python-dns
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 01:30:27 +0200 Soren Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 09:27:02AM +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers
wrote:
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 19:11 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Is there an Ubuntu equivalent of packages.debian.org's web display of
each
On Sunday 15 July 2007 20:11, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 01:30:27 +0200 Soren Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 09:27:02AM +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers
wrote:
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 19:11 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Is there an Ubuntu
On Monday 16 July 2007 06:10, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Am Freitag, den 06.07.2007, 16:24 +0200 schrieb Daniel Holbach:
If you want to work in the team, please nominate yourself in the during
the next week and we'll set up a Launchpad poll the week after that.
up until now Chuck Short, Søren
NEW: videotrans_1.6.0.orig.tar.gz
NEW: videotrans_1.6.0-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
NEW: videotrans_1.6.0-0ubuntu1.dsc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 22:47:21 +0700
Source: videotrans
Binary: videotrans
Architecture: source
Version: 1.6.0-0ubuntu1
NEW: mnemosyne_0.9.8.1.orig.tar.gz
NEW: mnemosyne_0.9.8.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
NEW: mnemosyne_0.9.8.1-0ubuntu1.dsc
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 22:24:24 +0300
Source: mnemosyne
Binary: mnemosyne
Architecture: source
Version: 0.9.8.1-0ubuntu1
Distribution: gutsy
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ubuntu
Just one more small point on this thread
If merging is a free for all, then someone needs to update
http://merges.ubuntu.com/universe.html
It currently says, If you are not the previous uploader, ask the previous
uploader before doing the merge. This prevents two people from doing the same
On Monday 23 July 2007 15:47, Jordan Mantha wrote:
...
A bunch of good stuff
...
Any thoughts?
Sounds quite reasonable to me.
Scott K
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
NEW: kcmnvview_0.3.orig.tar.gz
NEW: kcmnvview_0.3-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
NEW: kcmnvview_0.3-0ubuntu1.dsc
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:15:41 +0200
Source: kcmnvview
Binary: kcmnvview
Architecture: source
Version: 0.3-0ubuntu1
Distribution: gutsy
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:43:38 +0200 Bram Neijt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I was looking through the packages in the Needs Packaging list and
found a few of the interesting packages already being worked on in
Debian.
However, these packages where not marked as In progress and there
isn't a
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 21:43:25 +1000 Sarah Hobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bram Neijt wrote:
Looking for a package, I would not like to see this bug, because it's
already being worked on: the package is already there, it just needs a
sponsor.
Obviously, most of us cant sponsor to debian.
I
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:03:05 +1000 Larry Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So how do I update Feisty to a 2.6.22 kernel?
Upgrade to Gutsy once it's released. New kernels don't get backported.
Scott K
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
I was recently subscribed to the debian-mentors mail list (working on getting
a package uploaded to Debian) and discovered that the author of the Debian
Mentors system is getting ready to overhaul that system.
That got me thinking...
Why do REVU an mentors need to be separate?
Except for
On Monday 30 July 2007 01:50, Jordan Mantha wrote:
On 7/29/07, Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was recently subscribed to the debian-mentors mail list (working on
getting a package uploaded to Debian) and discovered that the author of
the Debian Mentors system is getting ready
On Monday 30 July 2007 04:42, Bram Neijt wrote:
Hi all,
Wether joining REVU and Debian Mentors is a good idea or not, I can't
say. However, I can tell you that I don't like the everything through
mail approach debian has. When I'm getting help on packaging, I like
the fact that IRC and REVU
On Monday 30 July 2007 05:41, Charlie wrote:
Speed is only realized if a MOTU is *willing* to review your package.
If not it will just set there, and set there and set there. As a
matter of fact I have a package in REVU right now and the last MOTU
comment is dated July 10. And while I am up
On Wednesday 01 August 2007 11:26, Matt Cyber Dog LaPlante wrote:
I've got clamav-milter 0.90.2-0ubuntu1 installed. There is a bug in the
/etc/init.d/clamav-milter script around like 99:
kill -9 -$PID
The problem appears to be that the pid file
(/var/run/clamav/clamav-milter.pid) also
On Wednesday 01 August 2007 11:26, Matt Cyber Dog LaPlante wrote:
I've got clamav-milter 0.90.2-0ubuntu1 installed. There is a bug in the
/etc/init.d/clamav-milter script around like 99:
kill -9 -$PID
The problem appears to be that the pid file
(/var/run/clamav/clamav-milter.pid) also
On Thursday 02 August 2007 21:01, Andy Price wrote:
... The ability for non-MOTUs to leave comments is the one advantage that
launchpad has over REVU to me.
We've had discussions a number of times about setting up a group of MOTU
hopefuls that could comment, what it's lacked is someone to do
On Thursday 02 August 2007 20:02, Emmet Hikory wrote:
On 7/30/07, Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At one point I was getting interested in developing REVU but I think I
heard a rumour that launchpad was going to be used for reviewing
On Friday 03 August 2007 09:03, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I'm a bit sad that there seems to be a general attitude among MOTUs that
we get the tools we are working with crafted by either Debian or
Launchpad. This raises the assumption that there is not much technical
understanding needed for
On Friday 03 August 2007 12:08, Jordan Mantha wrote:
On 8/3/07, Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
more snip
And please don't misunderstand me. I'm not saying no to launchpad. Au
contraire, I rather say, lets craft tools that fit and extend
launchpad. The launchpad guys are very
Since I know Canonical is getting close to announcing a 6.06.2 update for
Dapper (mostly fixes for newer hardware) I thought it might be good to see
where we were on pending SRUs for Universe/Multiverse and get them all
published to dapper-updates before their announcement.
The good news is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NEW: zekr_0.5.1.dfsg.orig.tar.gz
NEW: zekr_0.5.1.dfsg-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
NEW: zekr_0.5.1.dfsg-0ubuntu1.dsc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2007 19:40:00 -0500
Source: zekr
Binary: zekr
Architecture
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:58:35 -0700 Jordan Mantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
It seems like REVU might be down of a little while yet. It also looks
like some people might not have online storage space to put packages
until the server is back up.
I'd like to offer some space for contributors
On Friday 17 August 2007 08:35, Neil Wilson wrote:
I'm sure the limits and space are very welcome. Bear in mind that
Launchpad has Private Package Archives as of next Wednesday and there
is still a beta running at the moment.
Perhaps it is time to adopt the tool used for the rest of Ubuntu
Stefan,
I know from IRC that this was a non-trivial setup that you have invested a
lot of time in doing for the community. Thank you very much for doing it.
Scott K
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:35:08 -0400 Mathias Gug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:48:39PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
It's a valid configuration to have the database on an other host.
Therefore similar packages like simba depend only on a database client
(which will
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 05:21, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Hello Andy,
thanks for bringing this up.
Am Mittwoch, den 25.07.2007, 16:47 +0100 schrieb Andy Price:
I thought I'd bring some attention to it because the next ones are very
soon and I think the previous ones drifted past silently.
Nicolas Robin wrote:
Maybe this Idea should be applied for an official classroom channel,
specially designed for new contributors to be helped by MOTUs ? It is
the best way to progress, to be in touch with many MOTUs and to be free
to ask all the questions you want.
I thought this is
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 14:23, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
Is there a consensus on what to do when you are adding files to a package?
I am thinking for example on a situation where I am authoring a complete
autotools system to a software package, and upstream is, say, dead or
unresponsive ;-)
On Thursday 23 August 2007 04:05, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Hello everybody,
Lucas Nussbaum explains in
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Debian/Usertagging how to make use of
Debian User Tags. It will make it easier to track the origin of bugs and
patches. Thanks for that Lucas.
So if your
On Thursday 23 August 2007 10:57, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 23/08/07 at 09:41 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2007 04:05, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Hello everybody,
Lucas Nussbaum explains in
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Debian/Usertagging how to make use of
Debian
Forwarded FYI for those who have Python applications they'd like to try and
get into Debian. I've worked with the people from Debian Python Modules Team
that are setting this team up and they are very open to contribution from
Ubuntu.
Scott K
-- Forwarded Message --
NEW: wulfware_2.6.0.orig.tar.gz
NEW: wulfware_2.6.0-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
NEW: wulfware_2.6.0-0ubuntu1.dsc
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:39:01 +
Source: wulfware
Binary: wulf2html wulfstat wulflogger xmlsysd libwulf-dev libwulf2
Architecture: source
Version: 2.6.0-0ubuntu1
Distribution:
On Tuesday 04 September 2007 13:26, Jordan Mantha wrote:
On 9/4/07, Jonh Wendell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Em Ter, 2007-09-04 às 10:10 -0700, Jordan Mantha escreveu:
On 9/4/07, Jonh Wendell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, folks.
A few days ago i packaged evolution-rss, but it was not
I guess I'll jump in and be the process czar and point out that nothing should
get uploaded without going through motu-uvf and a UVFe (which has not yet
been requested).
Scott K
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
On Thursday 06 September 2007 15:59, Meel Me wrote:
Hello,
Is it correct that you are the maintainer of the Ubuntu package clamav?
The clamav package in Ubuntu 6.06 LTS Dapper Drake is incompatible with the
latest virus database. When I try to scan my system I get the following
error
On Friday 07 September 2007 01:42, Jeremy Schoenhaar wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 06.09.2007, 16:26 -0400 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
On Thursday 06 September 2007 15:59, Meel Me wrote:
Hello,
Is it correct that you are the maintainer of the Ubuntu package
clamav?
The clamav package
NEW: dkms_2.0.17.4.orig.tar.gz
NEW: dkms_2.0.17.4-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
NEW: dkms_2.0.17.4-0ubuntu1.dsc
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:58:46 -0500
Source: dkms
Binary: dkms
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.17.4-0ubuntu1
Distribution: gutsy
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers
On Thursday 27 September 2007 11:18, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
I've been asked by Tor developers if it would be possible to remove the
tor package (which is in universe) from future Ubuntu releases. The
software can (and should?) stay in the repository and in development
versions but should be
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 18:24, Matthew Revell wrote:
Shortly after we released Launchpad 1.1.9 (on 21 September),
Launchpad's housekeeping system - the Launchpad Janitor - expired
2,862 Incomplete bugs. We estimate that around 900 of these bugs
should not have been expired.
We're sorry
On Friday 12 October 2007 15:34, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi all,
This is a quick note to let everyone know the timeline for the gutsy
freeze. To ensure a successful build of all release images in time for
Thursday's scheduled release, the CD building process will begin on Monday
after 18:00
On Friday 12 October 2007 15:50, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Friday 12 October 2007 15:34, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi all,
This is a quick note to let everyone know the timeline for the gutsy
freeze. To ensure a successful build of all release images in time for
Thursday's scheduled release
The gutsy-proposed repository is available for uploads now.
Normal policy is to not upload to -proposed until a fix is in the development
release, but that's not possible now. As a substitute, you can ask motu-uvf
for an ack to upload (one is enough). This was agreed by myself, zul, and
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 13:45, Peter (Ubuntu List) wrote:
Do you have to be a MOTU to contribute to the backports?
No. We take backports from the developmental Ubuntu release. What backports
most needs is people to test packages. To be a member of the group that
approved backports,
A testing version of libphp-phplot has been published in feisty-proposed.
To test it, please add the following line to your sources.list(5):
deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ feisty-proposed universe
Then, update and upgrade (or install) libphp-phplotl.
Please provide feedback to
On Friday 19 October 2007 18:03, João Pinto wrote:
Hello,
is there any plan to provide a sponsorship[1] like process for new packages
?
I am thinking on something like, a process which would allow a non MOTU
Hopeful to upload a package, it would be triaged and either enter a queue
where it
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 17:37:15 -0700 Sai Emrys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/20/07, Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may have to boot with acpi=off for gkrellm to work.
gkrellm seems to work just fine. It loads the i8k plugin and the fan
speed control depending on cpu temperature
On Saturday 20 October 2007 21:39, Sai Emrys wrote:
On 10/20/07, Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My point was that it works better for me with acpi=off. It might for you
too.
Understood, but I'm just confused about *what* exactly works better.
As far as I can tell, for everything
On Monday 22 October 2007 15:39, Michael Bienia wrote:
An updated version of gnumed-client is available in gutsy-proposed for
testing.
To test it, please add the following line to your sources.list:
deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ gutsy-proposed universe
Please provide feedback to
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 02:35:44 -0500 Brandon Holtsclaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since it seems there has been a bit of confusion over just exactly what
needs to be done pre-upload to -proposed I suggest the folloing list be
added to the upload step of the wiki and become official policy so there
On Tuesday 23 October 2007 08:19, Gauvain Pocentek wrote:
Hi,
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:39:21 +0200 Daniel Holbach
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 23.10.2007, 15:20 +1000 schrieb Sarah Hobbs:
Michael, what in hell were you thinking?
This kind
On Tuesday 23 October 2007 03:35, Brandon Holtsclaw wrote:
Since it seems there has been a bit of confusion over just exactly what
needs to be done pre-upload to -proposed I suggest the folloing list be
added to the upload step of the wiki and become official policy so there is
no confusion
application runs
reported issue cannot be reproduced
package uninstalls cleanly
package purges cleanly.
Scott Kitterman wrote:
I would add:
No regression in the functionality being patched.
This doesn't mean regressions are OK, but that regression testing around
the change
On Tuesday 23 October 2007 09:01, Gauvain Pocentek wrote:
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Tuesday 23 October 2007 08:19, Gauvain Pocentek wrote:
Please let's try to avoid that kind of behaviour, there are smarter ways
to deal with problems in Ubuntu.
What do you suggest? Once someone
On Tuesday 23 October 2007 09:11, Daniel Holbach wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 23.10.2007, 07:16 -0400 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
While in general I might agree with you, while the language may be a bit
strong, it's a perfectly reasonable question from a member of the
community to a candidate
As promised when we decided to go ahead with uploads to gutsy-proposed before
hardy was open, here is the list of uploads that need to go into Hardy to
catch up. Please reply to this message to the list when you've uploaded to
hardy so it'll be easy to track.
Source: audacious-plugins
Binary:
On Tuesday 23 October 2007 12:05, Michael Bienia wrote:
On 2007-10-23 10:19:51 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
As promised when we decided to go ahead with uploads to gutsy-proposed
before hardy was open, here is the list of uploads that need to go into
Hardy to catch up. Please reply
On Thursday 25 October 2007 15:29, Cyber Dog wrote:
I'm mailing this list because it's given as the Maintainer for the
postgrey package in gutsy. There is a major bug in postgrey 1.27-4
that makes the postgrey daemon die regularly. A report was filed on
launch pad *two months ago*, but it
On Thursday 25 October 2007 16:42, Stéphane LOEUILLET wrote:
Hello,
[Bug 157211] SRU - Update from 0.5.1 to 0.5.3 swfdec0.5
[Bug 157212] SRU - Update from 0.5.1 to 0.5.3 swfdec-mozilla
Packages are available in my PPA :
https://edge.launchpad.net/%7Eleroutier/+archive
More than only
Most of you probably already know this from IRC, but ...
I don't plan on much involvement during the Hardy developement cycle. MOTU
has gotten to stressful for me for the stress to be worth the enjoyment I get
out of it.
There are a number of reasons that I hope that by sharing, I can hope
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 09:20:41 +0900 Emmet Hikory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
A month ago, an official list of Bug status values was published
on launchpad [1]. Without a discussion of the appropriate
classification of the various statuses that are used to track bugs
that may someday be fixed, I
On Friday 02 November 2007 10:53, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
On 02/11/2007, William wrote:
You should upload to REVU
I did.
Please ask MOTUs in #ubuntu-motu (irc.freenode.net) to review you package
I am almost never in a position to be on IRC. I had rather assumed
that the email
On Friday 02 November 2007 14:00, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
Hello,
Getting new packages into Ubuntu is one of the most challenging ways to
get involved in MOTU and packaging (it's how I did it too). You can also
help with fixing bugs in existing packages and merging updates from
Debian.
On Thursday 08 November 2007 13:57, Pär Andersson wrote:
On Thursday 08 November 2007 17.59.35 Reinhard Tartler wrote:
It is difficult to distinguish between experienced and unexperienced
packagers if you don't know them pretty well. That's why commenting on
the packages is restricted to
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 00:16:26 +0100 Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
STANDARD WORKFLOW:
LP is where needs-packaging bugs are created to document the desire for
or
intent to package something.
Once someone starts working on a new package
Just slightly amended, this proposal was approved today at the MOTU meeting:
STANDARD WORKFLOW:
LP is where needs-packaging bugs are created to document the desire for or
intent to package something.
Once someone starts working on a new package, they assign the bug to
themselves and set
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:30:16 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Emmet Hikory wrote:
Reviewers and Packagers,
At the recent MOTU Meeting, a set of guidelines for new package
review was reviewed. This list is meant to supplement reviewers base
opinions when reviewing
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:13:45 -0600 Justin Dugger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Nov 12, 2007 4:34 PM, Emmet Hikory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Emmet Hikory wrote:
1:
http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/dpatch_dbs_etc_etc_etc_etc_considered_harmful/
On a longer term basis, did any progress come out
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 21:54, Sarah Hobbs wrote:
Kjeldgaard Morten wrote:
My question is how you found the LP bug #? I actually find the
merging workflow extremely opaque and convoluted. And LP is still a
mysterious maze to me. Probably the messiest webtool on the Internet.
But the
.. Original Message ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:14:05 +0100 Cesare Tirabassi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks for sharing your opinion.
This thread is of interest to #ubuntu-motu-mentors too, please cc any
reply to
that list as well.
I disagree. Anyone in the mentors program should be
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 18:48:00 +0100 Cesare Tirabassi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007 16:12:28 Scott Kitterman wrote:
That doesn't really answer my questions:
Right now, the purpose of mentoring is not solely that of preparing MOTUs,
one
of the very reasons to make
On Sunday 25 November 2007 19:36, Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
On Monday 26 November 2007 00:34:03 Scott Kitterman wrote:
.. Original Message ...
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:14:05 +0100 Cesare Tirabassi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks for sharing your opinion.
This thread is of interest
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 10:56, Emmet Hikory wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 7:53 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
1) Go visit MoM, DaD, or multidistrotools, and merge everything by
Wednesday night/ Don't worry if it doesn't have your name on it: at
this point any merge is fair game. Further, if you
1 - 100 of 394 matches
Mail list logo
