Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 08.08.14

On 9 August 2014 16:15, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Łukasz, > > On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 12:21:56AM +0200, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak wrote: >> Hello everyone! > >> Image promotion! Yes! After a very hard and tiring battle (really), we >> were finally able to get rid of all the most serious blockers a

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Still religious comments in core-apps code

Dear Michael and Michel, On 10 July 2014 16:58, Michael Spencer wrote: > Hi Michel, > > I'm very sorry that got added. Like I said before, those files came from a > library of mine. I obviously did not notice that comment (or the person who > reviewed that commit), or I would not have kept it in

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Identifying memory issues, #2

On 5 June 2014 19:03, Thomas Voß wrote: > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Rodney Dawes > wrote: >> On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 18:37 +0100, Alan Pope wrote: >>> Here's the only output I managed to grab and paste before it froze:- >>> >>> http://paste.ubuntu.com/7588543/ >> >> Not directly related to m

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Renaming the Ubuntu system.img to avoid confusion?

On 4 June 2014 20:26, Jani Monoses wrote: > Due to it being called system.img when it was actually flashed to the > Android system partition, the Ubuntu root filesystem image residing under > /data/system.img can be easily confused with the Android system.img that is > under /var/lib/lxc/android/s

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Archive management plans for phone RTM

On 4 June 2014 21:20, Colin Watson wrote: > > Any other questions? > Will PPAs be enabled on the derivative distribution, such that if I wish/need I can build packages in the PPA against the RTM suite. -- Regards, Dimitri. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ub

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Renaming to: Ubuntu App Launch

On 23 May 2014 15:37, Stephen M. Webb wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 05/23/2014 09:38 AM, Ted Gould wrote: >> On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 05:54 -0300, Sergio Schvezov wrote: >>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Ted Gould >> > wrote: >>> >>> If f

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Develpers Heads Up !!! serious issues with our session startup

On 21 May 2014 11:14, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > Am Dienstag, den 20.05.2014, 15:50 -0700 schrieb Robert Park: >> Hey ogra, >> >> Sorry I meant to reply to this sooner. Do you know if Friends is >> impacted by this? I know Friends does download a bunch of data and >> caches it in the home direc

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] CMake modules

On 5 May 2014 12:45, Michał Sawicz wrote: > Please reply-to-all to include the mailing list. > > On 05.05.2014 12:26, Sam Segers wrote: >>> We have a few (that I'm cleaning up currently) in lp:unity8, too¹. I >>> really think (some of) these should become part of the SDK itself. >>> >>> Sam, would

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing process, restoring "trunk" for development

On 8 April 2014 13:30, Alberto Mardegan wrote: > > Hi all! > At the USD there was a session about the landing process, and some > people brought up the point that having the "trunk" branch synchronized > with the archive was inconvenient for developers: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Igj-

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 01.04.2014

On 1 April 2014 21:10, Max Brustkern wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Gustavo Boiko > wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Didier Roche >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> 2 images since yesterday, finally one where we will get full test results >>> hopefully! (first

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 01.04.2014

On 1 April 2014 21:33, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > On 1 April 2014 21:10, Max Brustkern wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Gustavo Boiko >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:44

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Default Locale for images

On 29 March 2014 01:59, Sergio Schvezov wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Steve Langasek > wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 06:37:09PM -0400, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: >>> Popey noted that doing "sudo -u phablet -i" to gain phablet user >>> after shelling gets me a posix locale, while doing

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] ANN: TRAINCON-0 - CITRAIN all stop starting Friday

On 21 March 2014 14:08, Alexander Sack wrote: > > On the front of data, we haven't seen much new. For instance we only > know about a single case where this "all halt" event has negative > impact; so please speak up if you are affected. > Similar to Colin, I am deeply and negatively impacted by "

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] System Apps staus - March 21, 2014

On 21 March 2014 13:42, Bill Filler wrote: > > Gallery > > Gallery finally released as a click package > > After being blocked in CI Train for quite some time, finally landed some > significant changes to gallery-app that improve desktop mode and on device: > And has it been uploaded into the cli

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] .click release procedures blocking in-archive development, for 4 weeks and counting. (python2 removal)

On 20 March 2014 14:55, Martin Albisetti wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> >> I request to release calendar-app click 205 into the store and the >> images. I am told that latest trunk of ubuntu-calendar-app (at >> revision 212) i

[Ubuntu-phone] .click release procedures blocking in-archive development, for 4 weeks and counting. (python2 removal)

At the moment phablet-tools upload is stuck in a silo, blocked by our inability to release no-change uploads of clicks. On 2014-02-24 revision 205 of calendar-app was merged into trunk, and not released into the archive. Fast-forward to today. 201 is still on the images and has known crasher bugs

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Unreproducible test results, blocking python2 removal - Re: [Merge] lp:~xnox/gallery-app/fix-sample-dir into lp:gallery-app

Dear Francis, On 13 March 2014 15:59, Francis Ginther wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> 1) is the ps-jenkins bot correct? > > Based on our IRC conversation and this package now being converted to > click, I believe the bot is testing with

[Ubuntu-phone] Unreproducible test results, blocking python2 removal - Re: [Merge] lp:~xnox/gallery-app/fix-sample-dir into lp:gallery-app

I made a merge proposal to resolve compatibility in gallery_app with next phablet-tools (which is needed to support transition to python3 and python2 supported branches). See: https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/gallery-app/fix-sample-dir/+merge/210517 A jenkins bot, points that .debs were built fo

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Some bugs with click store.

On 13 March 2014 12:10, Зонов Роман wrote: > > > 13.03.2014, 16:00, "Зонов Роман" : >> 13.03.2014, 15:58, "Colin Watson" : >> >>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 03:34:29PM +0400, Зонов Роман wrote: Firstly, click apps are loading too long. It is annoying. >>> If you're referring to click app

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] System images.

On 2 March 2014 14:50, Зонов Роман wrote: > "The default update mechanism is therefore image based. We build new images > on our build infrastructure, generate diffs between images and publish the > result on the public server." - part of Stéphane Graber's post. Fox example, > I have...1036 build

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 27.02.14

On 27 February 2014 18:43, Michał Sawicz wrote: > On 27.02.2014 18:48, Didier Roche wrote: >> >> 3. Screen unlock often not working during the tests (Kgunn) >> Seems that more investigation pointed on Mir direction: >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity8/+bug/1285215 > > > FWIW the un

[Ubuntu-phone] Silo reconfiguration

Some of the testing of phablet-tools silo landing-003 showed that for best test and validation coverage of both python2 and python3 test case execution, we ideally want to reconfigure that silo to also include: https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/unity8/py32ap/+merge/207760 (scheduled in line 33, not

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Summarizing up issues on current touch 4.4 based image

On 25 February 2014 14:19, Ted Gould wrote: > On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 12:00 +0100, Didier Roche wrote: > > As told yesterday in landing team email, we are blocking any landing > impacting Touch right now to get all focus and energy on fixing issues > without introducing newer one. > > > Not trying t

[Ubuntu-phone] Python2 removal status update

* unity8 https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/unity8/py32ap/+merge/207760 ( needs to land ) * ubuntu-ui-toolkit https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/py32ap/+merge/207757 ( needs to land ) * phablet-tools https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/phablet-tools/py2-3/+merge/205608 ( needs to land

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Required codecs on the ubuntu-phone

On 12 February 2014 14:35, Iain Lane wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:10:12PM +, Iain Lane wrote: >> […] >> Since I was going to upload the new upstream release of gstreamer >> anyway, I took the opportunity of splitting these plugins out into a >> separate package. I did a test build in a

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Required codecs on the ubuntu-phone

On 11 February 2014 14:00, Iain Lane wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 01:30:42PM +0000, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> […] >> Alternatively, the biggest one in the set appears to be opencv which >> pulls in majority of extra dependencies, including gtk2. As a bare >> m

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] universe vs. main packages in the image (source packages)

On 30 January 2014 17:34, Robert Park wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote: >> some people asked about a list of source packages instead of >> binaries ... so i assembled this too (since bugs will have to be filed >> against source anyway): > > > And, here is the list so

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 10.11.14

On 10 January 2014 17:27, Didier Roche wrote: > Hello everyone > > The unstable Ubuntu Touch image is now at its latest and finest with image > 121 which has just been promoted! > > It contains: > * some new system-settings updates (as part of the continuing citrain new CI > developer experience)

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Emulator Autopilot test results, image 119

On 10 January 2014 09:00, Michał Sawicz wrote: > On 09.01.2014 21:11, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> >> $ ./scripts/run-all.sh > > > Any reason for unity8 not being part of that? I've now added unity8, but I believe log collaction is still affected. Emulator dies befo

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Emulator Autopilot test results, image 119

On 9 January 2014 21:11, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: > Interesting stuff - would be nice to get a summary out of this somehow. At > any rate, you are missing the rssreader app in the run-all list :-) Could > you add? > > Nicholas > Added click com.ubuntu.shorts, autopilot test ubuntu_rssreader_app to:

[Ubuntu-phone] Emulator Autopilot test results, image 119

Here is an update on running autopilot tests in the emulator on the cloud. In lp:~xnox/ubuntu-test-cases/touch-emulator, i've implemented a watchdog, to detect failed emulator startup, which will strip and retry upto 3 times. This results in significantly less "stuck" instances. On the charm side

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Qt 5.2 info, fixes and rebuilds needed

On 8 January 2014 12:25, Daniel Holbach wrote: > Hello, > > > On 19.12.2013 10:02, Timo Jyrinki wrote: >> >> == Qt 5.2.0 final and library transition, rebuilds needed == >> >> Qt 5.2 is now at ppa:canonical-qt5-edgers/qt5-beta2 [1] - updates to >> Qt will come, but for example most synchronization

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Emulator + Autopilot = Win

On 7 January 2014 15:58, Ted Gould wrote: > On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 14:50 +0000, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > Whilst the emulator improvement work is on-going, I've spend some time > getting autopilot tests execution using the emulator running. > > > Awesome. I knew

[Ubuntu-phone] Emulator + Autopilot = Win

Whilst the emulator improvement work is on-going, I've spend some time getting autopilot tests execution using the emulator running. I've also made sure it's possible to execute them on i386/amd64 machines, desktops with and without GPU acceleration, in headless mode on the server (no DISPLAY vari

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Click to deb conversion?

On 5 January 2014 03:40, Robert Schroll wrote: > Hi all, > > From the little that I understand of it, click packages are just simplified > deb packages. So, is it possible to convert a click package into a deb? If > so, how? > > I ask because I'm working to make my Ubuntu Touch app usable on the

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] LP: #1260712 post-mortem and improving our processes

On 18 December 2013 16:34, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Dec 14, 2013, at 08:24 AM, Thomas Voß wrote: > >>Seconded. Treating DBus as an implementation detail and not leaking it >>to customers of your service helps a lot in versioning access to your >>API/service. In addition, our tooling and packaging

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] {DEVELOPMENT] ls result for debug

Hello, On 16 December 2013 18:57, François Leblanc wrote: > Hello, > > Does someone can post 'ls' result under ubuntu rootfs? > > I need to know if /system, /data (and some other) need to exist, > Depending on which mounting style is used, they should be. E.g. in the system-image, flipped, styl

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cross-compile with CMake from SDK Apps to Unity8/Mir

On 16 December 2013 18:14, Michael Zanetti wrote: > On Monday 16 December 2013 15:28:23 Thomas Voß wrote: >> I think the policy and guideline is pretty simple: For every new >> project that Canonical is upstream for, we will default to CMake >> (language/runtime-specific build systems aside). With

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Multiple versions of apps in store

On 16 December 2013 15:27, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > On 12/16/2013 07:54 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> On 16 December 2013 13:27, Martin Albisetti wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Alan Pope wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> We have cor

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cross-compile with CMake from SDK Apps to Unity8/Mir

On 16 December 2013 15:10, Daniel Holbach wrote: >> >> I think you want: >> >> click chroot -a armhf install ubuntu-sdk-libs-dev:armhf cmake >> >> does that work better? Note the arch qualified suffix ":armhf" on the >> ubuntu-sdk-libs-dev. > > This gets me into http://paste.ubuntu.com/6583849/ >

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cross-compile with CMake from SDK Apps to Unity8/Mir

On 16 December 2013 14:51, Daniel Holbach wrote: > On 16.12.2013 14:14, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> On 16 December 2013 12:56, David Planella wrote: >>> Really cool stuff. If I want to use my laptop to cross-compile a C++ QML >>> extension I'd like to ship as a

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cross-compile with CMake from SDK Apps to Unity8/Mir

On 16 December 2013 14:06, Alberto Mardegan wrote: > On 12/16/2013 01:56 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> 1) Simply because qmake encodes and assumes the same "host" >> configration options as were used when qmake & qmake modules were >> created. To properly s

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Multiple versions of apps in store

On 16 December 2013 13:27, Martin Albisetti wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Alan Pope wrote: >> >> >> We have core apps and 3rd party apps in the store. Currently each app >> in the store has one published version and that has ubuntu-sdk-13.10 >> defined as the framework in the manifes

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cross-compile with CMake from SDK Apps to Unity8/Mir

On 16 December 2013 12:07, Olivier Tilloy wrote: > > There are, yes. Off the top of my head: > - ubuntu-ui-toolkit > - oxide (not in the archive yet) > > There might be more. About ubuntu-ui-toolkit. Is it something that should be maintained at qt upstream as a platform module? (if that at all

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cross-compile with CMake from SDK Apps to Unity8/Mir

On 16 December 2013 12:56, David Planella wrote: > Dimitri, > > Really cool stuff. If I want to use my laptop to cross-compile a C++ QML > extension I'd like to ship as a binary in a .click package (and not > necessarily build a .deb package), could I use this as well? And if so, how? > Yes, you

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cross-compile with CMake from SDK Apps to Unity8/Mir

On 15 December 2013 12:29, Michał Sawicz wrote: > On 15.12.2013 13:26, Alberto Mardegan wrote: >> >> I'm interested in having the same support in qmake; is someone already >> working on it? >> What do your changes do, exactly? Do I understand correctly that the >> goal is to have the build system

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cross-compile with CMake from SDK Apps to Unity8/Mir

On 15 December 2013 12:26, Alberto Mardegan wrote: > Hi Dimitri, > > On 12/13/2013 07:58 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> As of latest cmake upload into trusty, it is now trivial to >> cross-compile CMake based projects: >> >> One time setup: >> $ mk-sbuild

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] LP: #1260712 post-mortem and improving our processes

On 13 December 2013 22:25, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > So, what steps can be taken to avoid such problems in the future, and what > lessons were learned that might be of use across the project? > dbus apis are hard, hence a few dbus apis are provided as shared-libraries (essentially generate client c

[Ubuntu-phone] Cross-compile with CMake from SDK Apps to Unity8/Mir

As of latest cmake upload into trusty, it is now trivial to cross-compile CMake based projects: One time setup: $ mk-sbuild --target armhf trusty Building a package: $ sbuild -A -d trusty --host armhf package*.dsc This succeeds for a wide variety of packages: * mir * unity8 * ubuntu-system-setti