On Tue, 14 Jun 2016, at 18:34, flocculant wrote:
> what image/iso testing actually happens?
I think, very little in comparison to Xubuntu and Lubuntu.
> ps - we're talking about iso.qa.ubuntu
Yes. for the *Ubuntu* 16.04 release I reported several bugs that
weren't fixed although some were fix
On 06/14/2016 03:32 PM, Brian Murray wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 06:34:42PM +0100, flocculant wrote:
copied to release list
On 14/06/16 18:27, Paul White wrote:
...snip ...Who, if anyone, looks at the *Ubuntu* test results? That was
all i was really asking.
I can't answer that question of
On 14/06/16 20:32, Brian Murray wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 06:34:42PM +0100, flocculant wrote:
copied to release list
On 14/06/16 18:27, Paul White wrote:
...snip ...Who, if anyone, looks at the *Ubuntu* test results? That was
all i was really asking.
I can't answer that question of cou
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 06:34:42PM +0100, flocculant wrote:
> copied to release list
>
> On 14/06/16 18:27, Paul White wrote:
> >...snip ...Who, if anyone, looks at the *Ubuntu* test results? That was
> >all i was really asking.
> I can't answer that question of course :)
I don't look at informat
copied to release list
On 14/06/16 18:27, Paul White wrote:
...snip ...Who, if anyone, looks at the *Ubuntu* test results? That
was all i was really asking.
I can't answer that question of course :)
I know exactly who looks at Xubuntu ones ...
I assume that people are looking at the jenkins
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016, at 18:12, flocculant wrote:
> We should be a team, even if we play for the 'oddteam'
I test ISOs for several flavours. :)
> not sure that's what you're implying - you know where I am on irc if I
> failed to grab your point
I'm merely wondering who actually looks at the re
Hey all,`
just wondering if the QA leads can grab a bit of time to just get
together somehow, put across what we hope to get done this cycle, maybe
help each other out, give each other ideas ...
free flowing type of thing ...
We all have to deal with similar issues - all cycle.
We all h
On 14/06/16 17:53, Paul White wrote:
Thanks flocculant but after seeing some of the comments on IRC I
wondering whether reporting bugs against Ubuntu ISOs at this stage will
actually prompt any action from those that can actually fix things.
May be I'll hold off testing Ubuntu 16.10 ISOs unti
Thanks flocculant but after seeing some of the comments on IRC I
wondering whether reporting bugs against Ubuntu ISOs at this stage will
actually prompt any action from those that can actually fix things.
May be I'll hold off testing Ubuntu 16.10 ISOs until I can actually
download their Beta rele
On 14/06/16 16:16, warren wrote:
There are not any testcases available for Ubuntu 16.10 Desktop on
iso.qa.ubuntu.com.
I do realize it is alpha but is this the norm?
Found Nick on irc - should have some Ubuntu things there now :)
regards
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.u
On 14/06/16 16:16, warren wrote:
There are not any testcases available for Ubuntu 16.10 Desktop on
iso.qa.ubuntu.com.
I do realize it is alpha but is this the norm?
Nope. Not normal. But there's not anyone about to deal with Ubuntu
things with Nick doing other things.
I did bring it up onc
There are not any testcases available for Ubuntu 16.10 Desktop on
iso.qa.ubuntu.com.
I do realize it is alpha but is this the norm?
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
GNOME Software pops up for new updates available even when that should
be handled by the Update Manager, and even when updates are configured
to install automatically.
The fix is as simple as running the following command:
gsettings set org.gnome.software download-updates false
But I'm unsure
13 matches
Mail list logo
