IK IK, im just saying :p ik ik i brag :p
2014/1/13 Alberto Salvia Novella
> If you ask, the topic of this list is "Ubuntu Quality" :)
>
>
> El 13/01/14 14:38, Samuel Gabbay escribió:
>
> I just wanted to say that for me, i have a 2.7 Ghz pc that i built from
> scratch and it runs fine. if im
If you ask, the topic of this list is "Ubuntu Quality" :)
El 13/01/14 14:38, Samuel Gabbay escribió:
I just wanted to say that for me, i have a 2.7 Ghz pc that i built
from scratch and it runs fine. if im out of topic on this chat. tell me.
Sincerly
Mr. Gabbay
2014/1/10 Alberto Salvia Nove
I just wanted to say that for me, i have a 2.7 Ghz pc that i built from
scratch and it runs fine. if im out of topic on this chat. tell me.
Sincerly
Mr. Gabbay
2014/1/10 Alberto Salvia Novella
> There's a useful *check* for this I always use: just imagine saying
> these words *spoken*, and m
There's a useful *check* for this I always use: just imagine saying
these words *spoken*, and many times you'll find that what was written
sounds *robotic*!
Regards ?
El 09/01/14 20:50, Ali Linx (amjjawad) escribió:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Nicholas Skaggs
mailto:nicholas.ska...@can
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Nicholas Skaggs <
nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Just a friendly reminder to everyone that we don't have the luxury of
> personal interaction via this list, so be careful when choosing your words.
> It's hard to convey tone and meaning sometimes. I know it'
Just a friendly reminder to everyone that we don't have the luxury of
personal interaction via this list, so be careful when choosing your
words. It's hard to convey tone and meaning sometimes. I know it's tough
for those who don't speak English as a first language :-) Think the best
of everyon
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:48 PM, irlandes wrote:
> Sorry, but it looks like they need to try an older version of Puppy for
> that minimal machine. Ubuntu was never designed for ultra-minimal
> machines. Puppy was. Sorry to bring up a competitive distro, but the
> truth is always best.
>
>
Hi,
Sorr
Are you sure of this? There is Lubuntu (LXDE) which might work on a system
with such low RAM.
Today's Ubuntu is too heavy for such ultra-slim-resource machines, I agree.
Lubuntu however *might* work and I suggest you look into that before saying
"Sorry this just won't work." Unless you have
Sorry, but it looks like they need to try an older version of Puppy for
that minimal machine. Ubuntu was never designed for ultra-minimal
machines. Puppy was. Sorry to bring up a competitive distro, but the
truth is always best.
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modi