Re: 128 MB Ram computer

2014-01-13 Thread Samuel Gabbay
IK IK, im just saying :p ik ik i brag :p 2014/1/13 Alberto Salvia Novella > If you ask, the topic of this list is "Ubuntu Quality" :) > > > El 13/01/14 14:38, Samuel Gabbay escribió: > > I just wanted to say that for me, i have a 2.7 Ghz pc that i built from > scratch and it runs fine. if im

Re: 128 MB Ram computer

2014-01-13 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
If you ask, the topic of this list is "Ubuntu Quality" :) El 13/01/14 14:38, Samuel Gabbay escribió: I just wanted to say that for me, i have a 2.7 Ghz pc that i built from scratch and it runs fine. if im out of topic on this chat. tell me. Sincerly Mr. Gabbay 2014/1/10 Alberto Salvia Nove

Re: 128 MB Ram computer

2014-01-13 Thread Samuel Gabbay
I just wanted to say that for me, i have a 2.7 Ghz pc that i built from scratch and it runs fine. if im out of topic on this chat. tell me. Sincerly Mr. Gabbay 2014/1/10 Alberto Salvia Novella > There's a useful *check* for this I always use: just imagine saying > these words *spoken*, and m

Re: 128 MB Ram computer

2014-01-10 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
There's a useful *check* for this I always use: just imagine saying these words *spoken*, and many times you'll find that what was written sounds *robotic*! Regards ? El 09/01/14 20:50, Ali Linx (amjjawad) escribió: On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Nicholas Skaggs mailto:nicholas.ska...@can

Re: 128 MB Ram computer

2014-01-09 Thread Ali Linx (amjjawad)
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Nicholas Skaggs < nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> wrote: > Just a friendly reminder to everyone that we don't have the luxury of > personal interaction via this list, so be careful when choosing your words. > It's hard to convey tone and meaning sometimes. I know it'

Re: 128 MB Ram computer

2014-01-09 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Just a friendly reminder to everyone that we don't have the luxury of personal interaction via this list, so be careful when choosing your words. It's hard to convey tone and meaning sometimes. I know it's tough for those who don't speak English as a first language :-) Think the best of everyon

Re: 128 MB Ram computer

2014-01-08 Thread Ali Linx (amjjawad)
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:48 PM, irlandes wrote: > Sorry, but it looks like they need to try an older version of Puppy for > that minimal machine. Ubuntu was never designed for ultra-minimal > machines. Puppy was. Sorry to bring up a competitive distro, but the > truth is always best. > > Hi, Sorr

Re: 128 MB Ram computer

2014-01-08 Thread Thomas Ward
Are you sure of this? There is Lubuntu (LXDE) which might work on a system with such low RAM. Today's Ubuntu is too heavy for such ultra-slim-resource machines, I agree. Lubuntu however *might* work and I suggest you look into that before saying "Sorry this just won't work." Unless you have

128 MB Ram computer

2014-01-08 Thread irlandes
Sorry, but it looks like they need to try an older version of Puppy for that minimal machine. Ubuntu was never designed for ultra-minimal machines. Puppy was. Sorry to bring up a competitive distro, but the truth is always best. -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modi