Re: Automatic image testing

2015-05-07 Thread Elfy
On 07/05/15 17:03, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: On 05/06/2015 08:59 PM, Istimsak Abdulbasir wrote: Is this were the iso builds are being tracked when they are produced for testing? https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/vivid/view/Smoke%20Testing/ This is a better view, but yes: http://ci.ubuntu.com/smo

Re: Automatic image testing

2015-05-07 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
On 05/06/2015 08:59 PM, Istimsak Abdulbasir wrote: Is this were the iso builds are being tracked when they are produced for testing? https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/vivid/view/Smoke%20Testing/ This is a better view, but yes: http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/vivid/desktop/. That URL shows the jen

Re: Automatic image testing

2015-05-06 Thread Istimsak Abdulbasir
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Elfy wrote: > Prior to the vivid cycle I used to often check on jenkins daily, indeed > had RSS feed for fails set up, just to check that things were at least > working basically. > > Sometime around December these stopped working, and still show the last > result

Re: Automatic image testing

2015-05-06 Thread Istimsak Abdulbasir
I am sorry. Disregard this email. On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Istimsak Abdulbasir wrote: > > > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Alberto Salvia Novella < > es204904...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Elfy: >> >>> Sometime around December these stopped working, and still show the last >>> result as abo

Re: Automatic image testing

2015-05-06 Thread Istimsak Abdulbasir
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Alberto Salvia Novella < es204904...@gmail.com> wrote: > Elfy: > >> Sometime around December these stopped working, and still show the last >> result as about 5 months ago as FAIL for everyone. >> > > I wonder if isn't working too. > >

Re: Automatic image testing

2015-05-06 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
Brian Murray: This is again another example of your lack of precision, not telling us the bug number you reported, such that no one reading this list can go confirm that bug and I wasted time looking for it. This is what I meant: to confirm what I said just didn't matter. It doesn't work towar

Re: Automatic image testing

2015-05-06 Thread Brian Murray
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 01:31:48PM +0200, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > Alberto Salvia Novella: > > I wonder if isn't working too. > > Brian Murray: > >The graph being broken doesn't mean the whole website "isn't working" > >which is what your first email indicated.

Re: Automatic image testing

2015-05-05 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
On 05/03/2015 06:53 PM, Elfy wrote: Prior to the vivid cycle I used to often check on jenkins daily, indeed had RSS feed for fails set up, just to check that things were at least working basically. Sometime around December these stopped working, and still show the last result as about 5 month

Re: Automatic image testing

2015-05-05 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
On 05/04/2015 11:37 AM, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: Alberto Salvia Novella: I wonder if isn't working too. Brian Murray: > You are likely wrong, but its hard to tell given the limited > information you've provided. Look that the last listed moth is October 2014.

Re: Automatic image testing

2015-05-05 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
Alberto Salvia Novella: > I wonder if isn't working too. Brian Murray: The graph being broken doesn't mean the whole website "isn't working" which is what your first email indicated. Precision isn't one of my values, because that's the automatic consequence of sim

Re: Automatic image testing

2015-05-04 Thread Brian Murray
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 05:37:50PM +0200, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > Alberto Salvia Novella: > >I wonder if isn't working too. > > Brian Murray: > > You are likely wrong, but its hard to tell given the limited > > information you've provided. > > Look that the la

Re: Automatic image testing

2015-05-04 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
Alberto Salvia Novella: I wonder if isn't working too. Brian Murray: > You are likely wrong, but its hard to tell given the limited > information you've provided. Look that the last listed moth is October 2014. And the graph is mostly continuous, when after releas

Re: Automatic image testing

2015-05-04 Thread Brian Murray
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 05:24:49PM +0200, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > Elfy: > >Sometime around December these stopped working, and still show the last > >result as about 5 months ago as FAIL for everyone. > > I wonder if isn't working too. You are likely wrong, bu

Re: Automatic image testing

2015-05-04 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
Elfy: Sometime around December these stopped working, and still show the last result as about 5 months ago as FAIL for everyone. I wonder if isn't working too. -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: htt

Re: Automatic image testing

2015-05-03 Thread Dan Chapman
On 03/05/15 23:53, Elfy wrote: Prior to the vivid cycle I used to often check on jenkins daily, indeed had RSS feed for fails set up, just to check that things were at least working basically. Sometime around December these stopped working, and still show the last result as about 5 months a

Automatic image testing

2015-05-03 Thread Elfy
Prior to the vivid cycle I used to often check on jenkins daily, indeed had RSS feed for fails set up, just to check that things were at least working basically. Sometime around December these stopped working, and still show the last result as about 5 months ago as FAIL for everyone. Is ther