#x27;t so this may not be a safe
change.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1971195
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
iannet-automated-testing-of-debian-installer-and-beyond/
https://openqa.debian.net/
I believe the service is from openSUSE and is also used by Fedora.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubun
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:52 PM Joshua Peisach
wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> UCR has been around for 3 years. Plan since day 0, when I went on discourse
> and brought up the idea was flavor.
>
> There have been reasons I've been so hesitant to reach out - these dang
> barriers. Again, for you and current
ech
Board.
You can make requests for improvement as an individual developer
without needing to speak on behalf of the Community Council.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
re is a problem.
Ideally, the developers would have some experience with completing
Stable Release Updates too since fixing bugs in stable releases is an
important part of providing support for stable releases.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
k you,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
Hi,
Could someone create a draft Ubuntu 22.10 release schedule?
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
t2gtk built with libsoup3 (&
epiphany-browser built against both)
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
discourage
new installs of Ubuntu GNOME 16.04 because it will be unsupported
after April and Ubuntu 18.04 LTS has many improvements for GNOME fans.
So I marked the Ubuntu GNOME builds as disabled in the ISO tracker to
not waste the valuable time of our ISO testers.
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-re
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 8:22 AM Nio Wiklund wrote:
> Is this a bug in ImageMagick convert, specifically for Ubuntu 18.04 LTS,
> or is converting to pdf turned off by intention?
The change was intentional. See https://usn.ubuntu.com/3785-1/
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailin
nstaller use the candidate channel
because there's no easy way to switch users back to the regular stable
channel, but hopefully gimp 2.10 will be promoted to the stable
channel soon. Give it a try! :)
[1] https://github.com/snapcrafters/gimp/issues/4
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailin
10 once mypaint is straightened out. I think the part about Ubuntu
Studio 18.04 not being an LTS and that's the only flavor to ship gimp
by default might help. Note that upstream did a very late soname bump
for gegl and we need the new gegl for gimp 2.10.0 final (but there is
only one reverse depe
nd make their own decisions.
Some irrelevant commentary: Fedora now has the same general release
process with only one milestone, a Beta. The Fedora 28 Beta came out
last week, the same week as our (Final) Beta.
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubun
rDebianDevelopers
https://manpages.debian.org/requestsync
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
rade problem.
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Robie Basak wrote:
> Does this plan (steps 1 to 3 above) seem reasonable to everyone?
It sounds reasonable to me. Thank you for taking the time to prepare
this proposal.
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Mod
ng to Bionic. Those numbers are big, and I expect massive
> problems.
I feel that you're missing the point that Robie and I are trying to communicate.
What is your plan to fix Debian? Have you made this "exceptional"
proposal to the Debian FTP Masters yet?
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
-
elease of Debian or Ubuntu, so people
using it now have an unsupported system.
epochs do get added to packages sometimes and sometimes the epochs
didn't really need to be bumped but the Debian archive can handle
epochs. Any third-party repositories should be aware of the epochs for
rele
2] https://mariadb.org/about/maintenance-policy/
And one more link for reference: https://bugs.debian.org/891641
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
pps or if most desktop metapackages will need
to explicitly request it instead.
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
bed to this list.
Also, some flavors like Kylin can't post to ubuntu-devel without moderation.
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
non-browser GTK apps.
Ubuntu, Ubuntu Budgie, and Ubuntu MATE already include fonts-noto-color-emoji.
I'd like to remove fonts-symbola from desktop-common.
Can I add fonts-noto-color-emoji to desktop-common?
There are more details at https://launchpad.net/bugs/1746310
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
-
osals had
> been drafted on wiki.ubuntu.com. Is the process documented any where?
Stéphane Graber pointed out in today's Tech Board meeting that this is
the documentation for LTS applications:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RecognizedFlavors#Guidelines_for_Tech_Board_to_designate_flavor_image_as_LTS
Thank
and
fonts-liberation to desktop-common and drop them from the individual
flavor seeds.
See https://launchpad.net/bugs/1720809 for more information.
If there are any objections or concerns, please reply quickly. I'd
like to make these seed changes this weekend.
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
--
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Is there a list of things that need to be changed for that to happen?
I guess the list is pretty short since we still want Ubuntu GNOME to
participate in the 16.04 point releases.
https://code.launchpad.net/~jbicha/ubuntu-cdimage/d
the daily ISO builds so that
the seed/metapackage changes don't break daily ISO building for other
flavors.
Is there a list of things that need to be changed for that to happen?
What's the correct order to not break things?
Here's a tracking bug:
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1718085
s overrides.
I have opened https://launchpad.net/bugs/1703116 to track this issue.
This was already done for the Ubuntu Desktop and Ubuntu GNOME flavors
in zesty but the change was a bit late in the release cycle so I
postponed dropping the overrides from the onboard package until now.
Thank
Hi,
chrome-gnome-shell 8-2ubuntu4~ubuntu16.10.1 was published to
yakkety-updates but somehow its .deb never made it to
archive.ubuntu.com.
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/c/chrome-gnome-shell/
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chrome-gnome-shell
This is pretty bad. Among other
t/bugs/1626220
3) Remove pywebkitgtk
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1677048
More at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.subscriber=ubuntu-archive&orderby=-id
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
htt
since most flavors are able to include universe
packages like this one.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1649537
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 7:55 AM, flocculant wrote:
> For the record - Xubuntu WILL be taking part in this milestone
Ubuntu GNOME will take part too.
Thanks,
Jeremy
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailma
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Archive Admins, please review mozjs38 for acceptance into zesty.
This is done now. Thank you!
Jeremy
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mail
Hi,
Archive Admins, please review mozjs38 for acceptance into zesty.
https://pad.lv/1662094
I apologize for not uploading this sooner but I was waiting for the
GNOME port to mozjs38 to be successful so that we wouldn't need to
have mozjs31 in Ubuntu too.
These universe package updates need mozjs
Ubuntu GNOME will participate in Alpha 2, to get feedback on a few of
the changes made since 16.10.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
Any volunteers to lead Alpha 2? According to the schedule [1], Alpha 2
is next week.
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ZestyZapus/ReleaseSchedule
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman
inator for this or other milestones.
We first need a volunteer for that or there won't be an Alpha 1.
Would delaying Alpha 1 a week change participation?
If we skip Alpha 1, does it make sense to rename Alpha 2 to just 'Alpha'?
[1] I think tasksel needs updating now but is there some
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Steve Langasek
wrote:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ZestyZapus/ReleaseSchedule
I notice the Final Release date was moved a few weeks earlier from an
earlier draft.
If we ship much of the latest GNOME stable release (3.24) like we did
with Yakkety (3.22), then it w
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Set Hallstrom wrote:
> Hi Release-team,
Ubuntu GNOME is in for Beta 1 also.
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
track SRU for this since there isn't 7
days left before iso testing next week.
When I tested this change, gnome-maps was not removed from an existing install.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https:
On 29 August 2013 11:36, Kate Stewart wrote:
> Is Ubuntu GNOME team ok with this? They're participating in the beta,
> and should probably have a say here.
Ubuntu GNOME uses LibreOffice now instead of Gnumeric so the freeze
exception is not a problem. Lubuntu is affected though.
Jeremy
--
On 24 August 2013 21:24, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> I noticed dgit got synced into saucy and is now in NEW queue.
>
> dgit is currently under heavily accelerated rapid development, thus I
> do not think it's a good idea to include dgit at this point for saucy.
>
> It is interesting package and to s
On 8 March 2013 16:41, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> Next week is Beta-1 for flavours interested in participating.
>
> The plan is to start building images at 21:00 UTC on Monday and release
> during my day on Thursday (US/Canada eastern time).
>
> If you are a flavour lead and wish to participate, ple
On 4 March 2013 10:23, Iain Lane wrote:
> We have raring's FF on Thursday 6th (this Thursday). However, it seems
> likely per ubuntu-devel discussions that the release will not happen as
> planned. Formally, the proposal is going to be taken to the tech board
> for approval after UDS discussions t
On 18 September 2012 13:12, John Lea wrote:
> Hi Documentation and Translation teams,
>
> We are currently in the process of finally landing the Dash work from this
> cycle. I know this is very late, but we are now making the final push to
> get everything landed into 12.10. The new 12.10 Dash w
As discussed at UDS Oakland, the Desktop Team is moving many of its
custom settings (gsettings overrides) to a separate package,
ubuntu-default-settings. This should reduce our diff with Debian GNOME
packages, and it should make it easier for derivatives to ship the
GNOME defaults without needing t
On 8 August 2012 09:04, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hey again,
>
> I just crossed that online I figured I would point it as one of the examples
> I was making reference to:
> http://www.techdrivein.com/2012/08/how-to-disable-system-program-problem.html
And here's another one from a pretty popular U
On 2 August 2012 17:31, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> What do people think about turning whoopsie off for 12.04.1?
I strongly support turning off the error message pop-ups for Ubuntu
12.04. I run a lab where we regularly get visitors who have never
knowingly used Linux on a PC before. While the popup
On 18 May 2012 11:58, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> A specific example: 10.10 was EOLd in early April this year. 10.04 LTS
> users with a backported maverick kernel therefore no longer received
> security updates for this kernel after the EOL announcement (naturally),
> but these users did not have a
Ok, here's my proposal, which should be more clear and concise than my
first email:
1. The Docs team will do what's necessary to get ubuntu-docs into the
LanguagePacks, so ubuntu-docs will be subject to the
LanguagePackTranslation deadline.
2. Delay the Docs Freeze for ubuntu-docs until next Tuesd
On 21 March 2012 04:37, David Planella wrote:
>> I was a bit surprised to see that ubuntu-docs and kubuntu-docs are
>> listed on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NonLanguagePackTranslationDeadline .
>> It doesn't seem right to give the translators less time to translate
>> stuff that will be changing until
Hi,
The Documentation String Freeze is scheduled for Thursday, but the
Ubuntu system docs won't be ready by then. The docs are reasonably
accurate (mostly thanks to all the work done upstream by the GNOME
Docs Team and periodic merges back to Ubuntu), but the documentation
on Unity is pretty incom
51 matches
Mail list logo
