I would like to add that - in my case here - the failure occured
connecting to a windows xp system.
--
[SRU] Hardy Heron: Nautilus fails to open directory with more than 140
subfolders
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217137
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Accepted into -proposed, please test and give feedback here
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed
--
[SRU] Hardy Heron: Nautilus fails to open directory with more than 140
subfolders
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: Incomplete = Fix Released
--
[SRU] Hardy Heron: Nautilus fails to open directory with more than 140
subfolders
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217137
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Hardy)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
Status: New = In Progress
--
[SRU] Hardy Heron: Nautilus fails to open directory with more than 140
subfolders
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217137
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 38140 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/38140
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 38140
dhclient3 keeps running after ifdown
--
[gutsy] wired static IP doe not hold
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138895
You received this bug notification
I second what DH asked? Will this be in hardy? It's been in Debian for
ages now.
--
PHP 5.2.6 fixes important security bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227464
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.
--
You are now subscribed to the blueprint ldap-defaultdit-usergrp-mgmt -
Default LDAP DIT for user and group managment.
--
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/ldap-defaultdit-usergrp-mgmt
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or
** Also affects: initramfs-tools
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
cannot boot raid1 with only one disk
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120375
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug.
--
You are probably correct, that some changes may be needed to initramfs-
tools.
I will be working on this for Intrepid. See:
* Blueprint:
https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/boot-degraded-raid
* Specification: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BootDegradedRaid
:-Dustin
** Changed in:
These are the security fixes as shown in the current changelog at:
http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-5.php
I chased down the CVS commit log messages against 5_2 for each of these.
Most of the fixes look relatively compact, with the exception of the
last, which is comparatively huge.
Version
** Changed in: abiword (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
** Changed in: freeradius (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
** Changed in: kolab-cyrus-imapd (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
** Changed in: libdbd-pg-perl (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
** Changed
- Brett Alton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am an Ubuntu user (both desktop and server platforms) and I want
to
give my point of view. When I install a server with LTS I want to be
able to update bugs found in the software for the whole LTS-period.
If
I install a new server (with
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:48:03PM -0400, Aaron Kincer wrote:
By the way, I'm not sure what you mean by modify their client Windows
machines, but with Zimbra, you don't have to modify. Reconfigure, maybe.
But you don't even have to touch a machine. You can create Outlook profiles
and push
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 10:13:04AM +0200, Serge van Ginderachter wrote:
Choices will only be viable when everybody speaks the same (MAPI)
langue. The problem with standards is that there are too many to
choose from.
The langue spoken by Outlook can be downloaded and compiled
today in a GUI
- Dan Shearer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For Exchange, the non-free version of Zimbra works great for
Outlook
connectivity.
Zimbra is fine for people who are able to modify their client Windows
machines. And that is something many, many large corporates refuse to
do, often for very
- Dan Shearer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually when I re-read it, I wasn't lost, just confused about the
implied goals :-) There's a very big difference between the use cases
that involve keeping the MS desktop untouched and moving away from MS
servers, and keeping the MS servers and
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 02 June 2008 19:20, Brett Alton wrote:
I also got frustrated last summer when I had to rollout my new Dell
PowerEdge 2950 with a release (Feisty) that was only supported for 18
months because Dapper couldn't
Dustin Kirkland wrote:
As it happens there's a new set of opportunties and we aren't limited to
just aping wherever Microsoft has gone... but refusing to acknowledge
clear failings does not bode well for the bold new wave.
True--tons of new opportunities. Personally, I'm more
(I hope this works, this is my first reply in a mailing list (Gmail).
While Linux might be picked up by new businesses, existing large businesses
will never migrate off MS unless we emulate (so to speak) MS. This very well
might be a futile effort. While I believe Linux (Ubuntu especially) should
Hi,
As discussed during last meeting, here is a proposal for a new meeting
schedule for the Ubuntu Server Team meeting:
Every Tuesday at 15:00 UTC.
Let me know what you think about it.
--
Mathias Gug
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
Hi,
The next Ubuntu Server Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, June 4th,
21:00 UTC in #ubuntu-meeting.
If there are any discussion points or items for decision that you would
like to add to the agenda [1], add an item to it and begin preparations
to present a short introduction to the topic on
From CDT (5 hours back):
That will put America between 8am-11am. IRC isn't a HUGE problem, I don't
think. I use Mibbit.com because I can't install local software on company
computers. Does mibbit run on port 80, or standard IRC ports?
Basically, the current time works for me, but I don't THINK
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Luke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From CDT (5 hours back):
That will put America between 8am-11am. IRC isn't a HUGE problem, I don't
think. I use Mibbit.com because I can't install local software on company
computers. Does mibbit run on port 80, or standard IRC
On Tuesday 03 June 2008 11:21, Mathias Gug wrote:
Hi,
As discussed during last meeting, here is a proposal for a new meeting
schedule for the Ubuntu Server Team meeting:
Every Tuesday at 15:00 UTC.
Let me know what you think about it.
That's generally better for me.
Scott K
--
On Tuesday 03 June 2008 12:00, Mark Schouten wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 07:37 -0500, Luke wrote:
(I hope this works, this is my first reply in a mailing list (Gmail).
While Linux might be picked up by new businesses, existing large
businesses will never migrate off MS unless we emulate
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 12:19 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
You should not focus on how to copy M$. You should focus on making the
opensource stuff work. (Start with a working calendar-solution, which
still isn't there, afaik). Try to get Evolution below 150MB memory when
using a calendar..
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Dan Shearer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ssh -o 'ProxyCommand=connect-proxy -H corporatefirewall:80 %h 443' \
myinternethost.example.org
where myinternethost is running an sshd on port 443.
Nice!
While we're sharing best practices, I run an IRC proxy on my
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 06:00:49PM +0200, Mark Schouten wrote:
Good comments. I'll answer at length, because I can use the text
elsewhere :-)
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 07:37 -0500, Luke wrote:
:
(Ubuntu especially) should continue to push into better server
management and technologies SIMILAR
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 07:03:45PM +0200, Mark Schouten wrote:
I think the power of linux is the openess and the use of open standards.
Trying to conform to non-standard solutions like the solutions from
Microsoft instead of building a platform based on open standards will
not be a solution.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Dustin Kirkland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=ubuntu-virt
This package has been updated based on feedback from Soren.
Hopefully, it's ready to go.
Thanks,
:-Dustin
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
Hello list,
I am attempting to install VMware tools 3.5.0 build 82663 on
Ubuntu-Server 8.04/2.6.24-18.32. I have successfully installed and
updated the required prerequisite packages (autoconf, automake,
binutils, make, cpp, gcc, linux-headers-`uname -r`, build-essentials) as
well as anything
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Chris Morrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
I am attempting to install VMware tools 3.5.0 build 82663 on
Ubuntu-Server 8.04/2.6.24-18.32. I have successfully installed and
updated the required prerequisite packages (autoconf, automake,
binutils, make,
I have been working on the blueprint of a centralized managment console
[1] using some of the ideas that some people gave me at UDS, i'm a little
stuck (and still fighting with the timezone changes) on some technical
details (i.e. how need meta data be defined) i will really apreciate if you
can
33 matches
Mail list logo
