Public bug reported:
nSGbtN
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: openssh-client 1:5.3p1-3ubuntu6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-30.59-generic 2.6.32.29+drm33.13
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-30-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Mar 29 01:21:15 2011
ErrorMessage:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744772
Title:
package openssh-client 1:5.3p1-3ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script
Seems it is indeed a bug, users on the mailing list could verify it. See
this thread: http://lists.amavis.org/pipermail/amavis-
users/2011-March/69.html
It seems to be directly related to the number of maximum instances.
netstat doesn't seem to give helpful information:
==
floeff@myserver:~$
I uploaded a fix for this now into natty, its just:
--- bind9-9.7.3.dfsg/debian/bind9-default.md5sum
+++ bind9-9.7.3.dfsg/debian/bind9-default.md5sum
@@ -1 +1 @@
-1229a956d3c6ca11fa344d69f082d7ca /etc/default/bind9
+2cfcfb7bf1b99c7930fd475907e38be7 /etc/default/bind9
so the default md5sum is
I filed a bug in debian about this, but IMO we should simply kill the
following lines from bind9.postinst:
if [ $config = /etc/default/bind9 ]; then
md5sum /etc/default/bind9 /usr/share/bind9/bind9-default.md5sum
fi
or stop shipping a default md5sum in the package itself.
--
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #620007
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620007
** Also affects: bind9 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620007
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #620007
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620007
** Also affects: bind9 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620007
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Summary changed:
- leftover
Salut Fabrice
2011/3/27 Fabrice Coutadeur coutade...@gmail.com
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nut
Hi,
While I was investigating a FTBFS in collectd:
...
configure:22249: checking for upscli_connect in -lupsclient
configure:22274: i686-linux-gnu-gcc -o conftest -Wall -g -O2
I've just installed karmic and was unable to connect to it in virt-
manager because the user I created during instalation wasn't added to
the libvirtd group. I've chosen that virtualisation host packages should
be installed as a part of the install process. Could that be the reason?
--
You
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bacula
Failed during install. Appeared to fail during SQL database creation.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: bacula-director-mysql (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-30.59-generic 2.6.32.29+drm33.13
Uname:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744928
Title:
package bacula-director-mysql (not installed) failed to
install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to euca2ools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744976
Title:
euca-describe-snapshots lists all public snapshots
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: euca2ools
with no additional parameters, euca-describe-snapshots will list all public
snapshots.
the command 'ec2-describe-snapshots' will list only those where owner == self.
euca-describe-snapshots doesn't support the '-o' flag at all, so really
this
** Also affects: cloud-init (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: cloud-init
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: cloud-init
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: cloud-init (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: cloud-init
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 712291 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712291
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 712291
package bacula-director-mysql 5.0.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
*
Hi Simon,
Thank you for taking the time to report bugs and trying to make Ubuntu
better.
I can confirm this bug report. This however, is fixed in newer releases
as the manpage is no longer shipped. Unfortunately, this is a none
critical bug that doesn't affect functionality, and it is unlikely
Hi There,
Thank you for reporting bugs and trying to make Ubuntu better.
Could you please try the following:
sudo dpkg --configure -a
Which should finish configuring the packages that were left
unconfigured.
or
sudo apt-get -f install
which should install the packages that were to be
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 725359 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725359
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 725359
package drbd8-source 2:8.3.7-1ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: drbd8
kernel module failed to build
* You can subscribe to bug 725359 by following
** Tags added: ec2-images
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744965
Title:
Cloud-init quits on wrong style line-ends
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Hi there,
Thank you for reopening the bug.
The MySQL apparmor profile already includes the /tmp in the profile,
however as abstractions:
#include abstractions/user-tmp
Which are used for various profiles. This file is found at:
/etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/user-tmp
I hope this helps.
I'm
If you continue to have further issues with the appamor profile, please
file a bug report against the *apparmor* package, as the profile is not
shipped by mysql.
Thank you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 742748 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742748
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 742748
package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
* You can
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 729288 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729288
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 729288
squid failed to restart after update to squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.2
* You can subscribe to bug 729288 by following this link:
Hi Ray,
Thank you for taking the time to report bugs and trying to make Ubuntu
Server better.
Unfortunately, the information you have provided is not enough for us to
determine what's the issue you are experiencing. Could you please any
information that will help us determine the issue? These
Hi Jose,
Thank you for taking the time to report bugs and trying to make Ubuntu
Server better.
Unfortunately, Ubuntu 9.10 (Karmic Koala) is reaching its End-of-Life
tomorrow April 30th. This means that Karmic is no longer supported. More
information can be found at [1]. For this reason, I'm
Hi Simon,
Thank you for taking the time to report bugs and trying to make Ubuntu
better.
Unfortunately, Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala its reaching its EOF (End of
Life) tomorrow April 30th. This means that Karmic is no longer
supported, and consequently, this bug won't be considered. More
information
Hi there,
Thank you for taking the time to report bugs and trying to make Ubuntu
Server better.
Unfortunately this doesn't seem like a bug with winbind itself but some
other component, such as an error with the installation sources
themselves. This means that the sources downloaded are not
@karaluh - yes, I suspect your user had not yet been added to group
'admin' when libvirtd's postinst added admin users to group libvirtd.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu.
Agreed, this looks unwarranted.
** Changed in: tomcat6 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: tomcat6 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Summary changed:
- tomcat cron deletes app log files after 14 days
+ tomcat cron should not delete app log files after 14 days
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: apache2
Dice que tiene queda en sin configurar..
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-29.58-generic 2.6.32.28+drm33.13
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-29-generic i686
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745073
Title:
package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.4 failed to install/upgrade:
el subproceso instalado el script
Thanks for getting back to me. What I did was sudo apt-get dist-upgrade and
that reconfigured things. Thanks again.
David
On Mar 29, 2011 10:21 AM, Andres Rodriguez andres...@ubuntu-pe.org
wrote:
Hi There,
Thank you for reporting bugs and trying to make Ubuntu better.
Could you please try
This bug was fixed in the package tomcat6 - 6.0.28-2ubuntu1.2
---
tomcat6 (6.0.28-2ubuntu1.2) maverick-security; urgency=low
* SECURITY UPDATE: directory traversal via incorrect ServetContext
attribute (LP: #717396)
- debian/patches/0012-CVE-2010-3718.patch: mark as read
This bug was fixed in the package tomcat6 - 6.0.24-2ubuntu1.7
---
tomcat6 (6.0.24-2ubuntu1.7) lucid-security; urgency=low
* SECURITY UPDATE: directory traversal via incorrect ServetContext
attribute (LP: #717396)
- debian/patches/0012-CVE-2010-3718.patch: mark as read only
This bug was fixed in the package tomcat6 - 6.0.20-2ubuntu2.4
---
tomcat6 (6.0.20-2ubuntu2.4) karmic-security; urgency=low
* SECURITY UPDATE: directory traversal via incorrect ServetContext
attribute (LP: #717396)
- debian/patches/0012-CVE-2010-3718.patch: mark as read only
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tomcat6
How to reproduce:
- install non-latest of tomcat6
- delete /etc/tomcat6/tomcat-user.xml
- apt-get upgrade
Expected behavior:
- The package should be upgraded to the latest version
Actual behavior:
Setting up tomcat6 (6.0.24-2ubuntu1.7) ...
Salut Arnaud!
I was going to report the patch (that contains both .in files) to Debian
as soon as it got uploaded to Ubuntu: you've been faster!
Thanks!
Fabrice
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: ia32-libs (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: ia32-libs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Scott Ritchie (scottritchie)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
The kernel team is looking for feedback on the state of the kernel for
server and cloud flavors of Ubuntu. Any and all feed back is welcome.
What are we doing right?
What are we doing wrong?
What configs should we change?
What new features should we included?
And most importantly what are the
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011, John Johansen wrote:
What are we doing right?
What are we doing wrong?
What configs should we change?
What new features should we included?
Very EC2 centric, and most are already known, but I'll repeat my pet
issues here for completeness:
* some modules are purposedly
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011, John Johansen wrote:
What are we doing right?
What are we doing wrong?
What configs should we change?
What new features should we included?
Very EC2 centric, and most are already known, but I'll repeat my pet
issues here
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 06:11:14 -0700
John Johansen john.johan...@canonical.com wrote:
The kernel team is looking for feedback on the state of the kernel for
server and cloud flavors of Ubuntu. Any and all feed back is welcome.
What are we doing right?
What are we doing wrong?
What configs
On 03/29/2011 03:11 PM, John Johansen wrote:
The kernel team is looking for feedback on the state of the kernel for
server and cloud flavors of Ubuntu. Any and all feed back is welcome.
What are we doing right?
What are we doing wrong?
What configs should we change?
What new features should we
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011, Scott Moser wrote:
I also would prefer the '-extra' modules for -virtual,
Ok
* would be nice if we weren't using GRUB 1 anymore; it's a bit
confusing to end up with both in instances
We really dont' have a choice here. 'pv-grub' is what runs in EC2 and
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011, Scott Moser wrote:
I also would prefer the '-extra' modules for -virtual,
Ok
* would be nice if we weren't using GRUB 1 anymore; it's a bit
confusing to end up with both in instances
We really dont' have a
Hi all,
This is the call for discussion about Ubuntu Server planning for the
11.10 cycle. Here's the process I'd like to use:
1. Send a call for topics from the Ubuntu Server community (this is it)
2. Have an exchange over irc and email on the ubuntu-server
channel/mailing list to discuss the
There does not seem to be a lot of overlap between people interested in
working on traditional server systems and cloud systems. There is also not a
lot of overlap in the package selection.
It would clear up confusion if Server were separate from Cloud. Cloud is more
of an alternate platform
There was a lot of discussion around improving the server boot experience
before the UDS-M. A number of people expressed interest in seeing more useful
diagnostic information during boot. Others expressed concerns with boot
reliability on the more complex hardware typically found in servers.
48 matches
Mail list logo
