On 12 June 2013 22:01, Jorge O. Castro wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Robie Basak wrote:
>>> I'm intimately familiar with preseeding, that being my former life and
>>> all, but I'm afraid I don't know what you mean by "global level." I
>>> take it that's something related to MAAS?
>>
>>
On 17 June 2013 22:24, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, June 07, 2013 11:15:17 AM Evan Dandrea wrote:
>> On 7 June 2013 10:00, Robie Basak wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 04:19:46PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> >> Of course this should be defaulted to no
Hi Robie,
On 6 June 2013 11:38, Robie Basak wrote:
>
> I thought I'd split this thread into two. One question is about what
> benefits error reporting on Server might bring, and that's what I'd like
> to discuss here.
>
> > [Daviey] Just need to work out, *if* it is worth doing...
>
> Is it worth
Sounds good to me :). Thanks Robie!
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
On 7 June 2013 10:00, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 04:19:46PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> Of course this should be defaulted to no.Given that the reports to e.u.c
>> are treated as more sensitive than crash reports to Launchpad, it is at best
>> counter-intuitive to expect
On 24 May 2013 17:20, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 07:01:54AM -0700, Evan Dandrea wrote:
> What I mean is that data does not get uploaded without the user knowing
> about it. So in my terms, error reporting on the desktop _is_ opt-in. In
> the Desktop case, the user kn
Hi Robie,
Thanks for kicking off this discussion.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Robie Basak wrote:
> that will cause us to misinterpret the results? Is there any need to
> categorise the reports at submission time (eg. perhaps ask the reporter
> a question)?
I'd prefer that we kept with the
