Quoting Robie Basak (robie.ba...@ubuntu.com):
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:09:53PM +, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Does this seem sensible? Any suggestions/alternatives are
> > appreciated.
>
> Is it possible to have a lowest common denominator "LTS" machine type
> that is long term stable and doe
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:09:53PM +, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Does this seem sensible? Any suggestions/alternatives are
> appreciated.
Is it possible to have a lowest common denominator "LTS" machine type
that is long term stable and doesn't need to change or be deprecated
between releases? Or
