> Workaround: Uninstall package ntpdate.
That also uninstalls the "ubuntu-minimal" package, which is yet another
bug (at least up until 14.04).
I also think ntpdate shouldn't be started at all on ifup. openntpd and
(I think) ntpd as well allow for large time adjustments on the first
query (-s swi
Workaround: Uninstall package ntpdate.
Why would the "Manual" setting be ignored?
Are ntp servers used to collect statistics on users, installations and reboots,
or for tracking portable computers?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is s
Colin: Synchronising the system time does not cause time zone
difficulties. I use manual time to work around a bug in
Evolution/Thunderbird/etc. And the purpose of my previous post was to
give an example of "why manual time should be preferred for any case
other than a complete lack of internet con
Victor: There should be no intrinsic connection between setting the
absolute (UTC) time and setting the system time zone. The former
certainly doesn't imply the latter, as time zones are implemented as
setting an offset from UTC time. If synchronising the system time
causes time zone difficulties
** Tags added: oem-services
--
No obvious way to prevent ntpdate to be run when interface are brought up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322518
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing
"But I don't see why manual time should be preferred for any case other
than a complete lack of internet connectivity!"
I live in two different time zones. Whenever I change the system time
zone, this messes up my synced phone's calendar. Therefore I do not
change the system time zone and set my c
While I agree that the system should honour the chosen settings (so if you say
'manual time' that is really all you get), I would argue that all systems,
desktop and server, should ship with a minimum NTP setup. If the load on the
Ubuntu time server is of concern, then you could use the minpoll
I'd argue ntpdate shouldn't be started at all by default. I can see no
reason why people would prefer using ntpdate rather than ntpd. Desktops
should ship without NTP enabled (i.e. ntp package not installed, but
installable via time-admin), and server should ship with it installed.
Current situati
There is a problem that administration panel settings in "Time and Date"
is not respected, because there are affecting ntp configuration, but
ntpdate configuration can not be set in any way. It is the bug in user
interface and not in ntp or ntpdate.
--
No obvious way to prevent ntpdate to be run
You can edit /etc/default/ntpdate and change NTPOPTIONS line to
NTPOPTIONS="-q"
which in effect tells ntpdate to "Query only - don't set the clock"
(quoting manpage).
--
No obvious way to prevent ntpdate to be run when interface are brought up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322518
You received
Thanks for the feedback.
Regards
chuck
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
No obvious way to prevent ntpdate to be run when interface are brought up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322518
You received thi
11 matches
Mail list logo
