I suspect that since the purpose of udev is to create devices, it's
reasonable for it to consider itself having failed if it can't create
devices. Opening a bug against udev would let us have that conversation
so I do think that is reasonable, I just don't much doubt how it will be
resolved. But
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 902190 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/902190
Ah, I missed that (because its fix released and I searched in the
default context).
I will dup this on that bug. Will there be an SRU ?
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 902190
udev fails to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 902190 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/902190
@Robert:
an SRU to oneiric is under way. It's trivial enough that an SRU to
lucid doesn't bother me, but until NETNS is re-enabled in lucid kernel
not many people will want to verify it - will you verify
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 902190 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/902190
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Serge Hallyn 902...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 902190 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/902190
@Robert:
an SRU to oneiric is under
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 902190 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/902190
Thanks, but if you don't need it let's safe the SRU team the work :) If
anyone wants it, they can nominate it for lucid and i'll do it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Would it be appropriate to open a lucid task on udev?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/902865
Title:
lucid udev upgrade failure on oneiric hosted lxc container
To manage
