On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 07:59 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> Unless someone can document a sensible video processing workflow
> (VJ, broadcasting, etc.) which is known to be well-done with it, I'm
> not sure it ought get any more or less attention than any of the other
> audio/video tools in the archiv
Len Ovens wrote:
> Took a while to find any docs for it... in the doc directory of the src
> package. freemix is designed to do live showing switching of videos stored
> as file on the computer like a VJ. I don't know if it can connect to a
> gstream opened by another app or not. But it is not desi
Regarding to a German post Lives seems not to run with 12.04 and there
are packages for
Packages are available for the following releases:
Ubuntu 10.04: 1.4.6-1~getdeb1
Ubuntu 10.10: 1.4.2-1~getdeb1
Ubuntu 9.04: 1.1.5-1~getdeb1
Ubuntu 9.10: 1.2.1-1~getdeb1
Ubuntu 11.04: 1.4.6-1~getdeb1
at http://
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 15:13 -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
> Comments?
Since Linux suffers of no or no serious NLE video cut, there shouldn't
be too much video packages included to an install media.
Regarding to soundtracks, resp. audio productions for videos, I would
welcome http://rg42.org/wiki/a3vtl
On Tue, August 7, 2012 7:13 am, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> Len Ovens wrote:
>> I don't find SW to handle 3 or
>> more input streams and do on the fly switching. (I think we used closer
>> to
>> 7 or 8 streams... though our switchers had more.. they had access to
>> every
>> stream in the building)
>
>
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 00:08 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Perhaps we should completely keep it off-list at some point, for the
> moment I only add an "OT" to the subject. I like to read such OTs. I
> learned by reading yours and I leaned a lot reading experiences of other
> engineers, my favorite is
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 14:13 -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
> Our RCA studio cameras were a bit bigger, but the peds and controls were
> similar. Control room layout was much the same too.
At that time "bigger" usually caused a better quality. The funny thing
is, that zooming and sharpness was operated di
On Tue, August 7, 2012 8:14 am, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> I remember similar prices for the Sony Betacam, 15DM.
> Betamax already was pro in the beginning 80s, but only Umatic high-band
was pro too. I started my "carrier" in the 80s, at the video studio of
the University Essen in the age of 17/1
Len Ovens wrote:
> I don't find SW to handle 3 or
> more input streams and do on the fly switching. (I think we used closer to
> 7 or 8 streams... though our switchers had more.. they had access to every
> stream in the building)
Assuming one is either willing to play with *lots* of gstreamer
On Tue, August 7, 2012 2:37 am, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> For audio we can buy some professional gear and use it with some
> semi-pro and consumer gear, just for fun.
> For video some might be able to do a similar mix for video gear, but at
> least I suspect that those people must work semi-pro or th
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 11:14 +0300, Stuart McQuade wrote:
> You're right. There's aren't any specific prices for the Sony Pro
> range on their website, but there are plenty of Sony resellers who
> offer prices. You can get a rough idea of the prices from this site:
> creativevideo.co.uk.
So Camcord
11 matches
Mail list logo
