On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 07:59 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote: > Unless someone can document a sensible video processing workflow > (VJ, broadcasting, etc.) which is known to be well-done with it, I'm > not sure it ought get any more or less attention than any of the other > audio/video tools in the archive that aren't part of known workflows: > while there's *lots* of software in the archive, and all of it is > presumably useful and used by some folk
>From time to time I use Linux to cut a video that contains the best of "Viewer discretion is advised" videos from the Internet for my taste. That's far, far ... ... ... far ... far, far ..., far ... far ..., far away from "a sensible ((semi-)pro) video processing workflow". Linux video is ... there isn't the money ... it's just for childish playing. The difference between Kmenc15 and Cinelerra or Lives etc. isn't that big. IIRC I very often preferred something like Kmenc15. It's a longtime ago, today I'm to old for "Viewer discretion is advised" videos from the Internet. ;) Ralf -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
