Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] TV cards

2015-06-02 Thread Jimmy Sjölund
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Grant Frank Burton wrote: > Greetings all > > I spent six hours trying to figure out what's wrong with the TV card and > the answer was really simple. > Because this system is more like Debian, I just had to configure it like a > Debian. > > Just open a terminal an

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] jack_control

2015-06-02 Thread Hartmut Noack
Am 02.06.2015 um 02:46 schrieb Len Ovens: > On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, Hartmut Noack wrote: > >> Ubuntu Studio is still used by some musicians but to be honest: with >> specs as you described them and consequently more than 20 ms latency >> you cannot record multitrack and you cannot play virtual instrum

[ubuntu-studio-devel] TV cards

2015-06-02 Thread Grant Frank Burton
Greetings all I spent six hours trying to figure out what's wrong with the TV card and the answer was really simple. Because this system is more like Debian, I just had to configure it like a Debian. Just open a terminal and do this……. sudo gedit /etc/modprobe.d/saa7134.conf (put these lines i

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Feature Definition Discussion: Multimedia Application Categorization

2015-06-02 Thread Ross Gammon
On 06/02/2015 07:21 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > On 06/02/2015 10:41 AM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: >> Using existing Freedesktop categories is of course no problem, >> especially if they make a lot of sense for specific packages. >> We still need to agree on the non-standard categories that we want to >> use

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Feature Definition Discussion: Multimedia Application Categorization

2015-06-02 Thread Ross Gammon
On 06/02/2015 10:41 AM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > Using existing Freedesktop categories is of course no problem, > especially if they make a lot of sense for specific packages. > We still need to agree on the non-standard categories that we want to > use and suggest upstream. > > Anything more? No -

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Feature Definition Discussion: Multimedia Application Categorization

2015-06-02 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015, at 10:55 AM, Set Hallstrom wrote: > On 2015-06-02 10:41, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > Ok, I finally was able to format the tables better. use and suggest > > upstream. > > wow! Well done! > > > > > Anything more? > > > > /Kaj > > > > > I will need to read up a bit on the main

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Feature Definition Discussion: Multimedia Application Categorization

2015-06-02 Thread Set Hallstrom
On 2015-06-02 10:41, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > Ok, I finally was able to format the tables better. use and suggest upstream. wow! Well done! > > Anything more? > > /Kaj > I will need to read up a bit on the main, universe, multiverse thing, But i will participate in going thru the graphics tables

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] jack_control

2015-06-02 Thread ttoine
I agree with Len, with external monitoring, you don't need low latency when recording and mixing with Ardour. At all. I do that all the time. About virtual instruments, you can play with up to 8 or 10 ms of latency, your brain is made for that: in real life, imagine you are on a big stage and you

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Feature Definition Discussion: Multimedia Application Categorization

2015-06-02 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
Ok, I finally was able to format the tables better. I've now added a column for release pocket. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Wily/AudioApplications https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Wily/GraphicsApplications https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Wily/VideoApplications What we could do

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Getting list of packages

2015-06-02 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
On Tue, May 19, 2015, at 09:38 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > Hi, > > What is the best way to retrieve a list of Ubuntu Studio packages in a > machine readable way ready for manipulation & publishing? > > The last time I needed to do this was for subscribing the US Bugs Team > to relevant bugs. I did