On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:58:08 -0800 (PST), Len Ovens wrote:
>> On 11/25/2015 at 3:38 PM, "Ralf Mardorf" wrote:
>>> I do most things with pluma and nano. There are other editors I
>>> like, butto replace gedit IMO pluma is the best editor.
>
>Count me odd, but for terminal I use joe unless nano
Since we have decided to go towards being desktop agnostic already for
more than a year, I don't see why we should bother with replacing text
editors.
We should sync with Xubuntu, and if there are problems, we should
cooperate with Xubuntu devs.
But, to discuss gedit anyway. As it seems, things
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
> Since we have decided to go towards being desktop agnostic already for
> more than a year, I don't see why we should bother with replacing text
> editors.
> We should sync with Xubuntu, and if there are problems, we should
> cooperate with
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:58:08 -0800 (PST), Len Ovens wrote:
On 11/25/2015 at 3:38 PM, "Ralf Mardorf" wrote:
I do most things with pluma and nano. There are other editors I
like, butto replace gedit IMO pluma is the best editor.
Count me odd, but for
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
But, to become truly desktop agnostic, we still need to solve a few
things.
* a way to install any existing DE with Ubuntu Studio specific stuff on
top by installing either only ubuntustudio-desktop (would require an
install script with both gui and
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
Since we have decided to go towards being desktop agnostic already for
more than a year, I don't see why we should bother with replacing text
editors.
We should sync with Xubuntu, and if there are problems, we should
cooperate with Xubuntu devs.
What it
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:04:10 -0800 (PST), Len Ovens wrote:
>Joe also colour codes things based on the programming language in the
>file which is nice. It does have some trouble dealing with white space
>the right way... or maybe I just need to configure it right.
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ cat -n
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
Yeah, it pretty much comes down to theming. If we are prepared to drop
our own, the solution is quite simple.
But, if we do want our own custom desktop specific for audio use, with
absolute control of every single service in the system we need our own
Just some thoughts here and I know probably my input wont matter much.
Why not use enlightenment WM. It is lightweight and super quick. I think
for an multimedia based distribution it would be a great way to go so that
one can maximise resource usage by the multimedia applications.
Jonathan
