Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Fwd: AppStream and gnome-software are coming to a Xenial near you: time to fix packages!

2016-02-19 Thread Len Ovens
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016, Ross Gammon wrote: Read this post the other day. Some of our packages appear on the website as having errors/issues. So if someone is looking for something to do.. It could also be relevant to our plans to become desktop agnostic. So ubuntu is moving from the only sli

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Fwd: Re: Fonts-droid has been deprecated and removed, please update your dependency :)

2016-02-19 Thread Ross Gammon
Hi All, A few of our packages are affected by the dropping of fonts-droid. I have read quite a few complaints here & there in Debian & Ubuntu that the suggested replacement fonts are not as pretty. We should should probably drop fonts-droid from our font-meta & work out a strategy for -desktop &

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Fwd: AppStream and gnome-software are coming to a Xenial near you: time to fix packages!

2016-02-19 Thread Ross Gammon
Hi All, Read this post the other day. Some of our packages appear on the website as having errors/issues. So if someone is looking for something to do.. It could also be relevant to our plans to become desktop agnostic. Cheers, Ross Forwarded Message Subject: AppStream an

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Default Wallpaper, WAS:Re: ART TEAM ALERT! 16.04 Wallpaper Contest has been decided.

2016-02-19 Thread Jimmy Sjölund
On 17 February 2016 09:34:32 +01:00, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, at 03:58 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016, at 03:54 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > > > > > > > I already sent an email to the guy, but realized we have other concerns > > > too. For 14.04, the wallpaper

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Default Wallpaper Design, WAS: Re: ubuntu-studio-devel Digest, Vol 106, Issue 15

2016-02-19 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016, at 03:47 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 14:02:04 +0100, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > >On Thu, Feb 18, 2016, at 07:25 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >> IOW instead of > >> > >>"Blue -violet -orange" consider to use > >> "pastel blue - pastel violet -

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] ubuntu-studio-devel Digest, Vol 106, Issue 15

2016-02-19 Thread Glenn Holmer
On 02/17/2016 01:39 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > I have an idea, which I do think we should be able to get done. It's > pretty simple, and symbolic. It should not be hard to make it look good. > * Visual elements from the kind of digital tools we provide, like > sequencer graphics (not a real sequen

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Default Wallpaper Design, WAS: Re: ubuntu-studio-devel Digest, Vol 106, Issue 15

2016-02-19 Thread Ralf Mardorf
PS: This way those "fresh" colours on my monitor seem not to be that fresh, but they might be a good starting point for experimenting. However, I don't have the time to do it.-- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Default Wallpaper Design, WAS: Re: ubuntu-studio-devel Digest, Vol 106, Issue 15

2016-02-19 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 14:02:04 +0100, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: >On Thu, Feb 18, 2016, at 07:25 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> IOW instead of >> >>"Blue -violet -orange" consider to use >> "pastel blue - pastel violet - pastel red" > >Would you be interesting in providing us with an e

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Default Wallpaper Design, WAS: Re: ubuntu-studio-devel Digest, Vol 106, Issue 15

2016-02-19 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016, at 07:25 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > If you consider "red" as too aggressiv and perhaps too dominating, then > replacing it by "orange" breaks your idea of "video is a mix of audio > and graphics". > > You could solve it by not replacing "red" by "orange", but instead by > givi