Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Checking in, a little vision, Calf & LMMS

2019-01-03 Thread Set Sakrecoer
On January 3, 2019 3:52:50 AM UTC, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > >On 1/2/2019 5:21 PM, Set Sakrecoer wrote: >> Maybe you have reverted to the old logo and I've just missed out, but >> on this wiki page there only seem to be the "corrrupt" version of the >> Ubunt

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Checking in, a little vision, Calf & LMMS

2019-01-02 Thread Set Sakrecoer
from Xubuntu (the Nick is escaping my memory right now, sorry) corrected the distorted path seen in those available on the wiki page linked above during 16.04 cycle. It's been really difficult to remove the broken logo, so i'm not blaming anyone. I'll show you the latest versions first thin

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Merge/pull Request

2016-11-30 Thread Set Sakrecoer
Greetings list! This came in today in #ubuntu-devel: sakrecoer: hey Set, how are you? I sent https://code.launchpad.net/~pitti/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntustudio.zesty.drop-pm-utils/+merge/312134 (trivial), would you have a minute to merge/pull it? I know how to do the merge/pull, and i understand

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Hellotux shop

2016-08-12 Thread Set Sakrecoer
On 2016-08-12 14:55, ttoine wrote: Set, can we add the Hellotux shop to this page on the website? http://ubuntustudio.org/merchandise/ I would also like to start the work on the Stickermule stickers, I will of course send you the prototype before, to be sure you all agree. BTW, I see that

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Feature tour

2016-07-28 Thread Set Sakrecoer
On 2016-07-28 14:33, Set Hallstrom wrote: This afternoon i will try put together Yeah... it became this evening, better than mañana? :D Anyways, here it is: http://sakrecoer.com/ubuntustudio/render.png Misunderstand me right: this is _not_ how it /must/ look, it is just an attempt to put

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Would Ubuntu Studio Team be Interested in Partnering with New England Conservatory?

2016-07-08 Thread Set Sakrecoer
On 2016-07-08 03:37, Devin wrote: On 07/07/2016 05:58 PM, Set Hallstrom wrote: Also I still think that a clear, "official-ish" message from the > core team of Ubuntu Studio would be a great asset. So far, I have > been telling people that "If NEC students provide bug reports, > Ubuntu

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Ardour back port testing

2016-07-07 Thread Set Sakrecoer
On 2016-07-07 05:37, C. F. Howlett wrote: The proposed message looks good. C. F. Howlett Thanks cfhowlett and Len :) Krytarik did a deep digging and found/corrected quite a few errors and it is now live on: http://ubuntustudio.org/2016/07/backports-the-benefits-and-the-consequences/ I

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] US Wiki/ help regarding data protection

2016-06-21 Thread Set Sakrecoer
On 2016-06-21 13:26, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 03:48:07 -0400, Jimmy Sjölund wrote: IMHO, why wouldn't we recommend or endorse using Tails instead of Ubuntu Studio in those circumstances? Tails include most of the applications we do but are focused on security way more than we

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Backports

2016-05-27 Thread Set Sakrecoer
Hi list, and specifically Ross, This was brought to my attention: https://bugs.launchpad.net/trusty-backports/+bug/1584930 and its all "\o/ yay! Ross rocks yet again!" I read it like an open invitation to the devel-team to test the backports but maybe it has a specific team? I'd gladly