Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] "Support Plan" request challenge (WAS: Ubuntu Studio LTS Re-Qualification)

2023-11-25 Thread Aaron Rainbolt
On 11/24/23 21:41, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:20:53AM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt wrote: SRUs in packages used by flavors (including flavor-specific packages) are also common. Speaking as a member of the SRU Team as well, I don't actually see evidence of this. There has been

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] "Support Plan" request challenge (WAS: Ubuntu Studio LTS Re-Qualification)

2023-11-24 Thread Mike Squires
Speaking as a user for some time, on multiple systems, of Ubuntu Studio, I can attest that the 20.04 version was extremely stable during the time I used it. I am currently using for somewhat different purposes Xubuntu 22.04, and this has been a bit less stable for me than Studio 20.04.  I'm

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] "Support Plan" request challenge (WAS: Ubuntu Studio LTS Re-Qualification)

2023-11-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:20:53AM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt wrote: > SRUs in packages used by flavors (including flavor-specific packages) are > also common. Speaking as a member of the SRU Team as well, I don't actually see evidence of this. There has been a run of SRUs right at the time of the

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] "Support Plan" request challenge (WAS: Ubuntu Studio LTS Re-Qualification)

2023-11-24 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Hey Erich, I'm a relatively new member of the TB and not familiar with how flavors were granted LTS status in the past but let me share my perspective on what you wrote. Le 24/11/2023 à 07:02, Erich Eickmeyer a écrit : That said, this seems way too detailed for a repeated LTS. I will

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] "Support Plan" request challenge (WAS: Ubuntu Studio LTS Re-Qualification)

2023-11-24 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Hi Seb, On 11/24/23 06:40, Sebastien Bacher wrote: Hey Erich, I'm a relatively new member of the TB and not familiar with how flavors were granted LTS status in the past but let me share my perspective on what you wrote. Le 24/11/2023 à 07:02, Erich Eickmeyer a écrit : That said, this

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] "Support Plan" request challenge (WAS: Ubuntu Studio LTS Re-Qualification)

2023-11-23 Thread Aaron Rainbolt
On 11/23/23 23:02, Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 02:10:54PM -0800, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: Hi Lukasz, I'm a bit taken-aback by the "support plan" request as for 20.04 LTS and 22.04 LTS this was never requested, and so as far as I know we would have to start from scratch. Since

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] "Support Plan" request challenge (WAS: Ubuntu Studio LTS Re-Qualification)

2023-11-23 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
On 11/23/23 21:02, Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 02:10:54PM -0800, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: Hi Lukasz, I'm a bit taken-aback by the "support plan" request as for 20.04 LTS and 22.04 LTS this was never requested, and so as far as I know we would have to start from scratch. Since

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] "Support Plan" request challenge (WAS: Ubuntu Studio LTS Re-Qualification)

2023-11-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 02:10:54PM -0800, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > Hi Lukasz, > I'm a bit taken-aback by the "support plan" request as for 20.04 LTS and > 22.04 LTS this was never requested, and so as far as I know we would have to > start from scratch. Since I'm basically on the technical side

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] "Support Plan" request challenge (WAS: Ubuntu Studio LTS Re-Qualification)

2023-11-23 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Hi Lukasz, I'm a bit taken-aback by the "support plan" request as for 20.04 LTS and 22.04 LTS this was never requested, and so as far as I know we would have to start from scratch. Since I'm basically on the technical side for two flavors now, I have to wear both those hats and come up with