On Wed, Feb 10, 2016, at 08:43 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> On 02/10/2016 03:31 AM, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
> > Exactly which version of kdenlive will be in 16.04? I have been building
> > kdenlive
> > from git master routinely, and here's what I've found: the 15.08 release
> > was a
> > bugg
On 02/10/2016 03:31 AM, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
> Exactly which version of kdenlive will be in 16.04? I have been building
> kdenlive
> from git master routinely, and here's what I've found: the 15.08 release was
> a
> buggy mess, 15.12 is very good, both can handle GPU/Movit effects, and
Exactly which version of kdenlive will be in 16.04? I have been building
kdenlive
from git master routinely, and here's what I've found: the 15.08 release was a
buggy mess, 15.12 is very good, both can handle GPU/Movit effects, and the
upcoming 16.04 kdenlive will have many new features which rig
On 02/09/2016 08:01 PM, set wrote:
> Just a heads up in this thread. :)
>
> Is kdenlive one the last one that needs to be done for Studio, or have i
> missed something?
Yes - it is the last high priority one that already has a template on
the tracker.
>
> On 2016-01-26 19:01, Ross Gammon wrote:
Just a heads up in this thread. :)
Is kdenlive one the last one that needs to be done for Studio, or have i
missed something?
On 2016-01-26 19:01, Ross Gammon wrote:
> Kdenlive: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538224
I can probably have kdenlive manual test written by friday.
Yours,
--
Set S
On 2016-01-26 19:01, Ross Gammon wrote:
I will take care of Hydrogen in
the next few days, but I would be grateful if someone would beat me to
one of the following:
Ardour: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+bug/1538219
Kdenlive: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538224
Qsynth: https:
Hi All,
Thanks to Kev's help in reviewing and merging test cases produced by
Bart and Set, and setting up the package tracker, we now have our
mandatory test cases published:
http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/350/builds/111025/testcases
You will notice that 4 of them, are only "t
On 2015-12-17 10:07, set wrote:
> Shows up this
> is about creating a "manual" on how test the programs, so many other
> people can try the same things manually in a program, instead of a robot
> testing it automatically, and together make sure the software works as
> expected.
Just to clarify; t
Thank you Ross!
On 2015-12-17 08:13, Ross Gammon wrote:
> Done - I don't like to hold up such productive people! See link on
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Testing/Testcases
>
> I only created one bug as I assume they are part of the same source
> package. Confirming this is difficult whe
On 12/16/2015 09:34 PM, set wrote:
> Hi Ross, Hi List,
>
> I'm missing manual-test-cases for:
>
> Phatch - PHoto bATCH Processor
> http://photobatch.wikidot.com/
>
>> Phatch is an user friendly, cross-platform Photo Batch Processor
>
> and for
>
> Phatch Image Inspector
> http://photobatch.wik
Hi, I spent several hours trying to understand the program but could not,
is very complicated, I looked for other options and found XnViewMP which
has a comprehensive batch converter. Good idea to make a manual, I hope to
see
2015-12-16 15:34 GMT-05:00 set :
> Hi Ross, Hi List,
>
> I'm missing ma
Hi Ross, Hi List,
I'm missing manual-test-cases for:
Phatch - PHoto bATCH Processor
http://photobatch.wikidot.com/
> Phatch is an user friendly, cross-platform Photo Batch Processor
and for
Phatch Image Inspector
http://photobatch.wikidot.com/image-inspector
> Phatch is designed to support m
Hi All,
I have been meaning to write an update on our progress with the test cases.
Last weekend Bart volunteered out of the blue to help out and produced 2
test cases with the help of flocculant. Here is one of them:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-testcase/ubuntu-manual-tests/trunk/view/hea
13 matches
Mail list logo
