On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Scott Lavender wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Jussi Schultink wrote:
>
>> Would there be a reason we wouldnt use the official backports? The
>> backports team dont bite, and I think they would be more than happy to have
>> our efforts and perhaps even acc
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Jussi Schultink wrote:
> Would there be a reason we wouldnt use the official backports? The
> backports team dont bite, and I think they would be more than happy to have
> our efforts and perhaps even accept one of us onto the team.
>
> Jussi
>
Excellent question
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:23 PM, wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I believe a significant quantity of Ubuntu Studio users stay with a LTS
> version for stability reasons and I feel strongly about providing reasonable
> backports for the latest LTS version.
>
> Therefore, would it be unreasonable to mainta
Hello all,
I believe a significant quantity of Ubuntu Studio users stay with a LTS
version for stability reasons and I feel strongly about providing
reasonable backports for the latest LTS version.
Therefore, would it be unreasonable to maintain an "official" Ubuntu Studio
backport PPA?
