Re: Replace Creox with Rakarrack?

2009-11-23 Thread Eric Hedekar
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Scott Lavender wrote: > I would like to suggest we replace Creox effects processor with Rakarrack > for Lucid. > > Creox [1] does not appear to be updated or maintained as the version > (0.2.2rc2) that is currently in Ubuntu Studio [2] (and Debian [3]) was > releas

Replace Creox with Rakarrack?

2009-11-22 Thread humbert . olivier . 1
Hi here, +1 Many users have problem with creox, at each time I said "install rakarrack or guitarix" But compilation isn't te better way for users ... If rakarrack will be directly in US, it's a great improvement. Do you know guitarix ? http://guitarix.sourceforge.net/ Thanks for your work ! Ol

Re: Replace Creox with Rakarrack?

2009-11-22 Thread Cory K.
On 11/22/2009 04:19 PM, Scott Lavender wrote: > I would like to suggest we replace Creox effects processor with Rakarrack > for Lucid. > > Creox [1] does not appear to be updated or maintained as the version > (0.2.2rc2) that is currently in Ubuntu Studio [2] (and Debian [3]) was > released in 2003

Replace Creox with Rakarrack?

2009-11-22 Thread Scott Lavender
I would like to suggest we replace Creox effects processor with Rakarrack for Lucid. Creox [1] does not appear to be updated or maintained as the version (0.2.2rc2) that is currently in Ubuntu Studio [2] (and Debian [3]) was released in 2003. Rakarrack [4], in contrast, released three new version