On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 20:38 -0500, Scott Lavender wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> You seem quite upset by this or am I misinterpreting your email?
>
Not upset, no. Just pointing out that I truly believe that I reckon it's
a bad decision that including the -rt kernel as the default kernel. And
I believe
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 06:52 -0500, Scott Lavender wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:55 AM, David Henningsson
> > wrote:
> > 2010-09-07 02:17, Chris Jones skrev:
> > > I know I've raised the question before regarding the
> >
i was thinking about how AVlinux used to include a .deb for the RT kernel
somewhere in the documents folder or something... what about that? point and
click easy for whoever wants it, and not default for those who dont...
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 06:52 -0500, Scott Lavender wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:55 AM, David Henningsson
> wrote:
> 2010-09-07 02:17, Chris Jones skrev:
> > I know I've raised the question before regarding the
> inclusion of the
> > real-time kernel in Ubuntu St
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Brian David wrote:
> The RT kernel tends to be unpredictable (which is why
> it is no longer the standard Ubuntu Studio kernel)
>
> --
> -Brian David
Incorrect. It has to do with our inability to maintain the RT kernel
to Ubuntu propers liking. A lot of it stems fr
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
> I know I've raised the question before regarding the inclusion of the
> real-time kernel in Ubuntu Studio, but why exactly is it necessary?
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> --
> Chris Jones
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
> Ubuntu-Studio-devel@l
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:55 AM, David Henningsson <
david.hennings...@canonical.com> wrote:
> 2010-09-07 02:17, Chris Jones skrev:
> > I know I've raised the question before regarding the inclusion of the
> > real-time kernel in Ubuntu Studio, but why exactly is it necessary?
>
> That's a good que
2010-09-07 02:17, Chris Jones skrev:
> I know I've raised the question before regarding the inclusion of the
> real-time kernel in Ubuntu Studio, but why exactly is it necessary?
That's a good question. Abogani has written a small overview of his take
on it here:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/
I know I've raised the question before regarding the inclusion of the
real-time kernel in Ubuntu Studio, but why exactly is it necessary?
Regards
--
Chris Jones
--
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu
> Toine,
>
> No, I was not using Falk's PPA. I have a Lucid install (with in the
> audio group) for my main recording box.
>
> But I have also done some testing of Maverick (which I believe
> included JACK2 at the time) although I didn't explore if I was part of
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:19 PM, tto...@ttoine.net wrote:
>
> Le 24/08/2010 19:04, Scott Lavender a écrit :
>
> Crimsun has mentioned that the user shouldn't be added to the audio group
> at all for real-time privileges. My understanding is that privileges are
> grante
Le 03/09/2010 13:13, David Henningsson a écrit :
> 2010-08-24 10:56, David Henningsson skrev:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Adding users to the audio group is not recommended for reasons I've just
>> documented here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Audio/TheAudioGroup
>>
2010-08-24 10:56, David Henningsson skrev:
> Hi,
>
> Adding users to the audio group is not recommended for reasons I've just
> documented here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Audio/TheAudioGroup
>
> Looking at ubuntu studio documentation, you seem to recommend people to
> a
Hi,
Adding users to the audio group is not recommended for reasons I've just
documented here:https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Audio/TheAudioGroup
Looking at ubuntu studio documentation, you seem to recommend people to
add themselves to the audio group pretty much (found by doing a search
2010-08-24 15:56, tto...@ttoine.net skrev:
>
>
> Le 24/08/2010 12:11, Cory K. a écrit :
>> On 08/24/2010 04:56 AM, David Henningsson wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Adding users to the audio group is not recommended for reasons I've ju
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:56 AM, tto...@ttoine.net wrote:
>
>
> Le 24/08/2010 12:11, Cory K. a écrit :
>
> On 08/24/2010 04:56 AM, David Henningsson wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Adding users to the audio group is not recommended for reasons I've just
> document
Le 24/08/2010 12:11, Cory K. a écrit :
On 08/24/2010 04:56 AM, David Henningsson wrote:
Hi,
Adding users to the audio group is not recommended for reasons I've just
documented here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Audio/TheAudioGroup
Looking at ubuntu studio documentation, you seem to reco
On 08/24/2010 04:56 AM, David Henningsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Adding users to the audio group is not recommended for reasons I've just
> documented here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Audio/TheAudioGroup
>
> Looking at ubuntu studio documentation, you seem to recommend people to
Hi,
Adding users to the audio group is not recommended for reasons I've just
documented here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Audio/TheAudioGroup
Looking at ubuntu studio documentation, you seem to recommend people to
add themselves to the audio group pretty much (found by doing a search
for &
19 matches
Mail list logo
