Nice work!
I'm not familiar with the difficulties between the graphical views in
different DEs, but if it's possible to have both terminal and gui version
of the installer I think it might appeal to users that are reluctant to
terminal stuff.
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Len Ovens
On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 10:59 +0200, Jimmy Sjölund wrote:
Nice work!
+1
I'm not familiar with the difficulties between the graphical views in
different DEs, but if it's possible to have both terminal and gui
version of the installer I think it might appeal to users that are
reluctant to
How wide a range of systems do you think that can be made to work in?
There are a lot of external derivatives of Ubuntu these days (not just Mint),
plus there is Debian, which Ubuntu and everything downstream from it
is based.
At some point I will want to try this on a Mint install, as the
On Sun, June 23, 2013 10:33 am, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
How wide a range of systems do you think that can be made to work in?
Work? The word work could be deceiving. The installer itself would work
on any ubuntu and any derivative. I am not sure how widespread the tools I
used are
On Sun, June 23, 2013 1:59 am, Jimmy Sjölund wrote:
Nice work!
I'm not familiar with the difficulties between the graphical views in
different DEs, but if it's possible to have both terminal and gui
version of the installer I think it might appeal to users that are
reluctant to terminal
Each version of Mint (except the Debian version) uses repos from the
version of Ubuntu that released about a month before it. Mint 15 Olivia
get almost all its packages from Raring, Mint 14 from Quantal, etc.
Mint is in effect a distro-level PPA on top of Ubuntu, from which a very
few packages
Lets say you have kubuntu installed and really like the interface, but
would like to have ubuntustudio or at least a chunk of the applications.
Not too hard to load up synaptic and search ubuntustudio for the metas.
Harder on USC which doesn't seem to show such things by default. Also,
which ones
