join
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Robert Klaar wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Scott Lavender
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Robert Klaar wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, either way you risk loosing supporters but in my opinion it's much
>>> worse to risk b
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Scott Lavender wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Robert Klaar wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Well, either way you risk loosing supporters but in my opinion it's much
>> worse to risk being outdated than getting a bit of disruption for some
>> time(and I can't
On 05/17/2011 08:17 AM, Janne Jokitalo wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 07:05:22AM -0500, Scott Lavender wrote:
[1] http://labor-liber.org/images/linux/xfce.jpg
Sorry for not adding any information to the thread, but that is a gorgeous
desktop! DAMN!
+1 on the XFCE desktop. I have used XFCE (
Am 17.05.2011 17:17, schrieb Janne Jokitalo:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 07:05:22AM -0500, Scott Lavender wrote:
[1] http://labor-liber.org/images/linux/xfce.jpg
Sorry for not adding any information to the thread, but that is a gorgeous
desktop! DAMN!
XFCE can be configured as that and it can be
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 07:05:22AM -0500, Scott Lavender wrote:
> [1] http://labor-liber.org/images/linux/xfce.jpg
Sorry for not adding any information to the thread, but that is a gorgeous
desktop! DAMN!
--
Jaska
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing l
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Ralf wrote:
>
>
> Ok, I'm already doing this kind of things. I don't like chats, I'm not
> subscribed to any chat. The mailing-list should be ok too ;).
>
> Ralf
>
hey Ralf... the offical IRC channels are logged at
http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ if you would like to b
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Karl Giesing wrote:
>
> My two cents:
>
> I haven't looked at Xfce in a long while, so I thought it was getting long
> in the tooth. I did a little research, and it's apparently not true at all.
> In fact, a new (and VERY updated) version just came out in January.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Robert Klaar wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Well, either way you risk loosing supporters but in my opinion it's much
> worse to risk being outdated than getting a bit of disruption for some
> time(and I can't see how this can get so disruptive to a serious
> producer/artist tha
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 13:36 -0400, Mike Holstein wrote:
>
> we, as a community (especially the ubuntustudio community) need to
> adopt an attitude 'if its broke, fix it'. there are simple things that
> you and i as non-technical users can do such as documentation, wiki
> updating, advocac
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 00:53 +0200, Robert Klaar wrote:
> And that being said, I think we ARE trying to attract the same people
> as apple do, and that might be something we can learn from wether we
> like it or not.
No, iCommercial first was for elitists and since some years, it's for
the all-con
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 00:23 +0200, Robert Klaar wrote:
> Many artists/producers DO use mac's and wouldn't this open up for a
> larger group of potential users?
iTux? I guess you'll get Windows and MacOs themes for many Linux DEs.
Hm? Many people don't know that it's also possible to customize even
Sorry if I got a bit confusing, I've been trying both out at my laptop, I
would probably guess though that for the next version they will leave Unity
for Gnome 3, that's the impression i get from the forums aso.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Thomas Orgis wrote:
> Am Tue, 17 May 2011 00:53:52 +
Am Tue, 17 May 2011 00:53:52 +0200
schrieb Robert Klaar :
> Well, either way the system seems to go towards a more OSX like feeling,
> however I can't help but like the inovative style of Gnome 3, atm. I'm
> running 10.10 with cairodock
Sorry if I'm confused ... are you using Gnome 3 or are you
13 matches
Mail list logo
