Sorry, I didn't know that Rosegarden did real audio and not just MIDI. I see
that it does after looking... :-( And I feel a bit stupid for saying that...
But really, you're not supposed to actually use that, are you??? It's
almost a joke, IMO.
I guess I should be more careful what I say... :-
On Saturday 05 January 2008, thomas fisher wrote:
> Here is a nice tutorial for Rosegarden. Just how
> concurrent it is to the versions in the 7.10 repository, I do not know.
Not very, I'm afraid, and Bomots.de doesn't respond to my emails, hasn't sent
a royalty statement in years, etc., so the w
On Friday 04 January 2008 19:46:22 D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> On Friday 04 January 2008, Christopher Stamper wrote:
> > Rosegarden is for notation and MIDI, NOT audio. So it won't help at all.
> > (unless you wanted to record MIDI and not audio).
>
> I'm not sure what to make of this. Are you sa
On Friday 04 January 2008, Christopher Stamper wrote:
> Rosegarden is for notation and MIDI, NOT audio. So it won't help at all.
> (unless you wanted to record MIDI and not audio).
I'm not sure what to make of this. Are you saying that Rosegarden can't
record audio, or that its audio facilities
Hello, first post here, but a long-time audio engineer.
A friend of mine just got me started with Ardour. Honestly, I haven't
found anything not to like about it yet (except for a couple
non-standard edit aspects). It is very powerful and as far as I can
tell, it is as complete as I could expect i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thomas fisher schrieb:
>> On 1/3/08, Darrin Goodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.
>>>
>>> What I would like to know are these two things:
>>> - is Ardour really all that better (over Audacity) when it comes to
>>> this sort of multi-tracking, or is ther
dme for testing your
> awareness...Where is the complexity..?
>
>
> Best Regards,Bharani Prasanth Sure.
>
>
> > Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:28:56 -0500
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ubuntu-studio-users@list
Sure.
> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:28:56 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: Re: Ardour vs. Audacity?
>
> Ardour is definitely the best. Rosegarden is for notation and MIDI, NOT
> audi
Nice! Thank you all for your input. It's evident to me that I just
need to spend some time learning to use Ardour. It sounds like a
great tool for multi-track recording.
Thanks!
- Darrin
On Jan 4, 2008 7:28 AM, Christopher Stamper
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ardour is definitely the best. R
Ardour is definitely the best. Rosegarden is for notation and MIDI, NOT
audio. So it won't help at all. (unless you wanted to record MIDI and not
audio).
Audacity is more for the beginners, who don't really care about multiple
tracks, quality or control. It may have a couple nice features, but ove
I would definitely recommend ardour if you want to record multi track
and have any level of control.
Audacity is great for single track recording and chopping the results
up, filtering etc and then exporting, but when it comes to recording
multiple parts, lining them up, mixing down, automating
> On 1/3/08, Darrin Goodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As a bluegrass musician, most all of the music that I am recording is
> > acoustic. Sometimes I might have a simple microphone plugged into the
> > sound card on my laptop, and other times I might be using high quality
> > condenser microp
On Thursday 03 January 2008, Darrin Goodman wrote:
> What I would like to know are these two things:
> - is Ardour really all that better (over Audacity) when it comes to
> this sort of multi-tracking, or is there another tool that I should
> look at?
I've used all three, and I really prefer Roseg
I use timemachine live recording, any number of channels from 2 to 8.
It has only one control -- record on/off. This makes it fool proof, which
is important to me when I'm recording a live show. I found snd
too complicated, and Ardour waaay too complicated for live recording.
Perhaps I'm an idio
As a bluegrass musician, most all of the music that I am recording is
acoustic. Sometimes I might have a simple microphone plugged into the
sound card on my laptop, and other times I might be using high quality
condenser microphones which are powered by my mixer (the mixer would
then feed to my so
15 matches
Mail list logo
