Hi,
On 26 October 2011 07:20, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
> This is my bad and I apologize for the inconvinience. I got stated on
> the schedule a little to late and was really keen on getting a set of
> language pack ready before the UDS.
>
> I was also a little fuzzy on the procedure when including
2011/10/25 Matthew East :
> On 21 October 2011 13:11, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
>> It also seems that the consensus is that we should have to full packs and
>> that the first one should definitely be one and then I would suggest making
>> either the fourth or the fifth one as well.
>
> Just by way of
Hello Matthew,
Matthew East [2011-10-25 22:40 +0100]:
> Just by way of a gentle protest, can I complain that the language pack
> was gone ahead with today ahead of schedule
For the record, the gettext export was started yesterday. As Kenneth
wanted the new packs this week still, we needed to do t
On 21 October 2011 13:11, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
> It also seems that the consensus is that we should have to full packs and
> that the first one should definitely be one and then I would suggest making
> either the fourth or the fifth one as well.
Just by way of a gentle protest, can I complain
Hallo everyone and thanks for the feedback.
It seems that no body has any wild objections to the dates, so we will
keep them, with a note that the third pack should be a normal delta.
It also seems that the consensus is that we should have to full packs
and that the first one should definitel
By the way, is someone able to tell me which (if any) of the remaining
natty language pack updates are "full"?
It would be great to get reminders of these in some form (even just to
the translators mailing list), so that I can remember to update
ubuntu-docs in advance with new translations.
--
M
Hello Kenneth,
thanks for working on this.
Kenneth Nielsen [2011-10-14 10:35 +0200]:
> Second, after a discussion yesterday with Kelemen Gabor we talked
> about that it would be nice if we could also _plan_ to make one or
> two of the planned language pack updates "full", in the sense that
> they
Hello everybody,
I read carefully the proposed schedule, and to me it looks OK.
If we can also plan two full langpacks, I would suggest to use the
third and fifth, or fourth and sixth uploads, in order now to provide
extensively time for translators to update documentation translations.
The third
El dv 14 de 10 de 2011 a les 10:35 +0200, en/na Kenneth Nielsen va
escriure:
> Hallo Guys
>
> First of I realised that I forgot to include Martin Pitt as a recipient
> on the first email, sorry.
>
> Second, after a discussion yesterday with Kelemen Gabor we talked about
> that it would be nice
Hallo Guys
First of I realised that I forgot to include Martin Pitt as a recipient
on the first email, sorry.
Second, after a discussion yesterday with Kelemen Gabor we talked about
that it would be nice if we could also _plan_ to make one or two of the
planned language pack updates "full",
10 matches
Mail list logo
