> I would like my Yakuake to run at startup when
> using Gnome. I know it does it under KDE (I think
> it uses ~/.kde/Autostart to do it) but with
> Gnome you have to manually run it.
>
> I remember when I used Mandriva you were able to
> get apps to 'autorun' by adding the run command to
> a
Chris Rowson wrote:
>> Chris,
>>
>>
>> Chris Rowson wrote:
I go for AMDs because they're a lot cheaper.
>>> I roll my own *joke*
>>>
>>> http://www.homebrewcpu.com/
>> Assuming it's genuine, that's a fantastic effort on the part of the guy
>> who did it.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tony.
>> --
>
> I th
> Chris,
>
>
> Chris Rowson wrote:
> >> I go for AMDs because they're a lot cheaper.
> >
> > I roll my own *joke*
> >
> > http://www.homebrewcpu.com/
>
> Assuming it's genuine, that's a fantastic effort on the part of the guy
> who did it.
>
> Regards,
> Tony.
> --
I think it was genuine Tony,
I
Philip Newborough wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2007 9:27 AM, Alan Pope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 09:13:28AM +, Kirrus wrote:
>>> The technical stuff behind multi-core processors mean that more processors
>> are only really useful if you're going to be running a number of
>> c
Chris,
Chris Rowson wrote:
>> I go for AMDs because they're a lot cheaper.
>
> I roll my own *joke*
>
> http://www.homebrewcpu.com/
Assuming it's genuine, that's a fantastic effort on the part of the guy
who did it.
Regards,
Tony.
--
Tony Arnold, IT Security Coordinator, University of Manches
Part of this mail is from Philip, which he sent directly to me instead of via
the list.
- "Philip Newborough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I take it you've not heard of the term `wintel` then?
> >
> > Intel is a massive company, which had a monopoly the same sort of
> size of Microsoft'
> I go for AMDs because they're a lot cheaper.
I roll my own *joke*
http://www.homebrewcpu.com/
Chris
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/
I go for AMDs because they're a lot cheaper.
On Dec 17, 2007 3:05 PM, Kirrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Not sure you can say Intel is evil. They are an awful lot better
> > (with
> > > respect to open sourcing code/drivers) than a number of other
> > vendors such
> > > as NVidia and ATI.
> > Not sure you can say Intel is evil. They are an awful lot better
> (with
> > respect to open sourcing code/drivers) than a number of other
> vendors such
> > as NVidia and ATI.
> >
> > Of the Intel machines I have, two have NVidia GPUs and five have
> Intel GPUs.
> > None have ATI.
> >
> > Che
On Dec 17, 2007 9:27 AM, Alan Pope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 09:13:28AM +, Kirrus wrote:
> > The technical stuff behind multi-core processors mean that more processors
> are only really useful if you're going to be running a number of
> cpu-intensive tasks on your com
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 09:13:28AM +, Kirrus wrote:
> The technical stuff behind multi-core processors mean that more processors
are only really useful if you're going to be running a number of
cpu-intensive tasks on your computer simultaneously (as each one will use
just one CPU core, leavi
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'm looking to upgrade my PC to something a tad quicker. Now I'm
> > interested in going to a Core 2 Quad Q6600 CPU (2.4GHz quad core).
> > Thing is, I'm not sure if I would really make use of a quad core
> CPU
> > (not to mention my other half
12 matches
Mail list logo
