Re: [ubuntu-uk] gmail downtime

Here's a nice quote specially for you, Al, you seem to have such an eirenic personality :-) " ... When from the merchant's hand the balance passes over to that Angel who, in the heavens, stills it, appeases it by the equalising of space ... " it's a fragment from Rilke's late notebooks. Alan Po

Re: [ubuntu-uk] gmail downtime (was: is list working?)

2009/2/24 Ian Betteridge : > I was hoping for a free Google bicycle :) > Heh, they're not that comfy :) Cheers, Al. -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/

Re: [ubuntu-uk] gmail downtime (was: is list working?)

I was hoping for a free Google bicycle :) On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Alan Pope wrote: > 2009/2/24 Ian Betteridge : > > I was really hoping it would stretch out to nine hours outage, at which > > point it would be past the SLA :) > > > > At which point you'd get what? 3 days extra service o

Re: [ubuntu-uk] gmail downtime (was: is list working?)

2009/2/24 Ian Betteridge : > I was really hoping it would stretch out to nine hours outage, at which > point it would be past the SLA :) > At which point you'd get what? 3 days extra service on the end of your contract. :) Cheers, Al. -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm

Re: [ubuntu-uk] gmail downtime

OK, I'm convinced. Ian Betteridge wrote: > I was really hoping it would stretch out to nine hours outage, at > which point it would be past the SLA :) > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Steve Garton > > wrote: > > Simon Wears wrote: > > It c

Re: [ubuntu-uk] gmail downtime (was: is list working?)

I was really hoping it would stretch out to nine hours outage, at which point it would be past the SLA :) On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Steve Garton < sheepeating...@sheepeatingtaz.co.uk> wrote: > Simon Wears wrote: > > It cut out at 9.30am GMT this morning. I didn't notice it. > > > > Simon W

Re: [ubuntu-uk] gmail downtime (was: is list working?)

Simon Wears wrote: > It cut out at 9.30am GMT this morning. I didn't notice it. > > Simon Wears > munkyju...@gmail.com | http://munkyju...@gmail.com > MunkyJunky on irc.freenode.net > > On 24 Feb 2009, at 13:20, Rowan wrote: > > >> I think I'd have noticed, I use gmail. >> >> Robert Flatters wr

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Gmail

Neil Greenwood wrote: > Hi Kris, > > On 09/11/2007, Kris Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Additionally, there is NO threat to your privacy, its just basic code. > > I'm not sure I'd go quite *that* far. There is some threat to your > privacy, it depends whether or not you believe Google when

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Gmail (was: Im Back!)

Hi Kris, On 09/11/2007, Kris Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Additionally, there is NO threat to your privacy, its just basic code. I'm not sure I'd go quite *that* far. There is some threat to your privacy, it depends whether or not you believe Google when they say "Do no evil"... Personal

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Gmail (was: Im Back!)

On 09/11/2007, Kris Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 09/11/2007, Gaurav Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It's the same way the ads are displayed when you are searching, it's > > no different. > > > > On 09/11/2007, Peter Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Friday 09 Novem

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Gmail (was: Im Back!)

On 09/11/2007, Gaurav Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's the same way the ads are displayed when you are searching, it's > no different. > > On 09/11/2007, Peter Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Friday 09 November 2007 10:49, Andrew Barber wrote: > > > I think gmail is quite superior

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Gmail (was: Im Back!)

It's the same way the ads are displayed when you are searching, it's no different. On 09/11/2007, Peter Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 09 November 2007 10:49, Andrew Barber wrote: > > I think gmail is quite superior to anything else. > > I've always stayed away from Gmail as I heard

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Gmail (was: Im Back!)

On Friday 09 November 2007 10:49, Andrew Barber wrote: > I think gmail is quite superior to anything else. I've always stayed away from Gmail as I heard that Google read your email in order to target ads at you. Even if it is just a machine rather than a person, it's overstepped the privacy line