Including itself. I suspect someone may have typed Google into Google, and
that can break the Internet, as every IT manager knows.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 8:01 PM, mac ammonius.grammati...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
Simon Wears wrote:
Google had about a 15 minute period where it flagged the entire
Hi -- is there a good reason for Google warning me away from the Ubuntu
site?It's telling me that the site may harm my computer, then throwing me a
502 when I look for details.
Cheers,
Doug.
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
2009/1/31 doug livesey biot...@gmail.com:
Hi -- is there a good reason for Google warning me away from the Ubuntu
site?
It's telling me that the site may harm my computer, then throwing me a 502
when I look for details.
Can't say I'm seeing the same thing... Is this an attack site warning
in
Its doing that for every single website. Its a bug, they should have it
fixed soon.
2009/1/31 doug livesey biot...@gmail.com
Hi -- is there a good reason for Google warning me away from the Ubuntu
site?It's telling me that the site may harm my computer, then throwing me
a 502 when I look for
That's reassuring - I thought it was something on my PC.
Sean
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Alec Wright ale...@gmail.com wrote:
Its doing that for every single website. Its a bug, they should have it
fixed soon.
2009/1/31 doug livesey biot...@gmail.com
Hi -- is there a good reason for
And it's working again now :-)
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Sean Miller s...@seanmiller.net wrote:
That's reassuring - I thought it was something on my PC.
Sean
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Alec Wright ale...@gmail.com wrote:
Its doing that for every single website. Its a bug,
Kickass!I thought that was a little bizzare -- it seemed to be every site
that even _mentioned_ Ubuntu.
2009/1/31 Chris Rowson christopherrow...@gmail.com
And it's working again now :-)
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Sean Miller s...@seanmiller.net wrote:
That's reassuring - I thought it
Google had about a 15 minute period where it flagged the entire internet as
Malware.
http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/google-flags-whole-internet-as-malware/
2009/1/31 doug livesey biot...@gmail.com
Kickass!I thought that was a little bizzare -- it seemed to be every site
that even
Simon Wears wrote:
Google had about a 15 minute period where it flagged the entire internet as
Malware.
Now there's an interesting philosophical proposition!
Mac
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan Pope wrote:
http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-09-01-n47.html
That link seems to have been ubuntu-uk-dotted, you can find the original
comic here:
http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/
- --
Stephen O'Neill
w:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 12:15:53AM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 22:46 +0100, Robert McWilliam wrote:
That's kind of missing the whole point of open source. snip
Well... I'll skip the first sentence as such a thing should be never
said on a list such as this because it
Woo
http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-09-01-n47.html
New open source web browser from Google. Looks very interesting from a
security and performance perspective alone. The cartoon is a great way to
introduce a new product to the media too.
Cheers,
Al.
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 20:51 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
Woo
http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-09-01-n47.html
New open source web browser from Google. Looks very interesting from a
security and performance perspective alone. The cartoon is a great way to
introduce a new product to the
What is really beginning to worry me is that there is too much choice of
applications in the Open Source world. Instead of working to make what
we have better and bite into bug #1 and give users a base set of
applications they can get comfortable with and trust, we are going to
leave maybe
Alan Pope wrote:
Woo
http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-09-01-n47.html
New open source web browser from Google. Looks very interesting from a
security and performance perspective alone. The cartoon is a great way to
introduce a new product to the media too.
Official word here:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 09:12:48PM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
What is really beginning to worry me is that there is too much choice of
applications in the Open Source world. Instead of working to make what
we have better and bite into bug #1 and give users a base set of
applications they can
Philip Wyett wrote:
With the size of the Google PR machine, a cute way of introducing a new
product was no real surprise.
What is really beginning to worry me is that there is too much choice of
applications in the Open Source world. Instead of working to make what
we have better and
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Robert McWilliam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's kind of missing the whole point of open source. The advantage
of distributed and uncontrolled development is that everybody goes in
whichever direction they want and explores the possibilities for
solving a
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 22:46 +0100, Robert McWilliam wrote:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 09:12:48PM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
What is really beginning to worry me is that there is too much choice of
applications in the Open Source world. Instead of working to make what
we have better and bite
Well said Robert!
On 1 Sep 2008, at 22:46, Robert McWilliam wrote:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 09:12:48PM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
What is really beginning to worry me is that there is too much
choice of
applications in the Open Source world. Instead of working to make
what
we have
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 22:53 +0100, John Levin wrote:
I can't see any way of 'herding cats' and concentrating everyone on a
base set of applications, or a single distro for that matter. I don't
think it would be desirable either; a lot of good comes out of people
trying new ideas (as long
Tiago Vieira wrote:
snip
...I believe they (Mozilla, Google, and MS)
are going a bit more than just a browser... they are going to mash the
browser into the desktop environment... this is just the beginning.
Hi, Tiago I think that's right, or one could even say they want to
*replace* the
I've been using Scoogle.org for a while now... they really have a
paranoid streak... no data collection, log deletion etc.. have a look at
their TC's... :)
I just went to www.scoogle.com, and there is a search box there, but the
site and the searches it returns seem buried under
LeeGroups wrote:
snip
Scroogle.ORG not scroogle.com :)
Doh! Thanks for correction. Good TCs on Scroogle.org. I'll use it!
Thanks! :-)
Mac
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.org/UKTeam/
LeeGroups wrote:
Thanks, guys, for the info.
For anyone who prefers to use a less obvious method of searching, may I
suggest using Vivismo's Clusty search engine - IE/Netscape/Mozilla
plugin available at http://clusty.com/toolbar/mozilla. Found, naturally,
with an extensive Google search -
Mac wrote:
Since Firefox does not have
scroogle as a 'search engine' to add to the search bar
Sorry, this isn't true. Or, more precisely, there's no Scroogle search
on the Mozilla addins site; but there is at Mycroft:
http://mycroft.mozdev.org/search-engines.html?name=scroogle
Mac
--
Mac wrote:
Snip
there's no Scroogle search
on the Mozilla addins site; but there is at Mycroft:
http://mycroft.mozdev.org/search-engines.html?name=scroogle
Cheers, Mac, I'll be another one using Scroogle in future.
Jeffef
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
Thanks, guys, for the info.
For anyone who prefers to use a less obvious method of searching, may I
suggest using Vivismo's Clusty search engine - IE/Netscape/Mozilla
plugin available at http://clusty.com/toolbar/mozilla. Found, naturally,
with an extensive Google search - why hand it to
Thanks, guys, for the info.
For anyone who prefers to use a less obvious method of searching, may I
suggest using Vivismo's Clusty search engine - IE/Netscape/Mozilla
plugin available at http://clusty.com/toolbar/mozilla. Found, naturally,
with an extensive Google search - why hand it to
LeeGroups wrote:
snip
I've been using Scoogle.org for a while now... they really have a
paranoid streak... no data collection, log deletion etc.. have a look at
their TC's... :)
I just went to www.scoogle.com, and there is a search box there, but the
site and the searches it returns seem
Some on the list may not be aware that Google, for whatever reason,
record all search originations. I would be interested to know if
searches conducted through the Mozilla Ubuntu search plugin are subject
to the same criteria as normal Google searches. Would anyone know if, as
I suspect, all
I know that they atleast record what program they have come from, as
the Mozilla Foundation get a couple of pennies each time a search is
sent from the built-in Firefox Google search.
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
Well complete privacy does not exist according to Google
http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/910/google-complete-privacy-does
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.org/UKTeam/
Jeff Fisher wrote:
Some on the list may not be aware that Google, for whatever reason,
record all search originations. I would be interested to know if
searches conducted through the Mozilla Ubuntu search plugin are subject
to the same criteria as normal Google searches. Would anyone know
Mac wrote:
AFAIR, Google log the originating IP addresses and details of the
searches for all searches done through their servers, and keep the logs
for two years.
Correction: 18 months. Then they are anonymized.
Mac
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
On 2008-08-01, Mac wrote:
AFAIR, Google log the originating IP addresses and details of the
searches for all searches done through their servers, and keep the logs
for two years. They do the same for all their on-line services. And
they reserve the right to data-mine the information you
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Sean Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a customised version of GIMP called Gimpshop which, I am told,
brings the product much closer to the Photoshop look/feel... the website
implies that in terms of the multiple windows vs. single windows debate that
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:59 AM, Sean Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/22/08, Paul Tansom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
** Jai Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-20 23:08]:
I disagree. The GIMP has a difficult user interface. Photoshop was
extremely easy to learn to use where as I've
Eh? There is a Linux version too...
I am aware of this, but the website says...
GIMPshop modifies the menu structure to closely match Photoshop's, adjusts
the program's terminology to match Adobe's, and, in the
Windowshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windowsversion, uses a
plugin called
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Sean Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eh? There is a Linux version too...
I am aware of this, but the website says...
GIMPshop modifies the menu structure to closely match Photoshop's, adjusts
the program's terminology to match Adobe's, and, in the Windows
On 2/22/08, Sean Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ps. Jai's Windows-using friends ought to be targeted by the Ubuntu
evangelists... think of all the time they'd have on their hands if they were
no longer capable of doing all his photo/image manipulation for him, lol!!
As good a reason to change
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:59:04PM +, Jai Harrison wrote:
I can understand why people who have never used Photoshop might not
find the GIMP complicated to use - especially if they've spent time
learning to use it but it presents a problem to people who are used to
image tool standards
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 23:49 +, Chris Rowson wrote:
By design, WINE is complete when it can replicate and translate all of
windows
programming system signals. By doing this, google will make the entire
WINE
base a bit more stable, rather than less, which means this will
** Jai Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-20 23:08]:
On 2/20/08, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jai Harrison wrote:
Is this is what the effects of a difficult user interface in the GIMP
are?
Different is not the same as difficult, it is just a different way of
working. It does not
On 2/22/08, Paul Tansom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
** Jai Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-20 23:08]:
I disagree. The GIMP has a difficult user interface. Photoshop was
extremely easy to learn to use where as I've never managed to get
anywhere with GIMP. The way it is now whenever I need
http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/20/1837204
'Nuff said... :-D
Chris
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/
- Gavin Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 09:51:24PM +, Jai Harrison wrote:
Is this is what the effects of a difficult user interface in the
GIMP are?
I really like the interface on The GIMP and it does everything I need,
but there
are some features that
On 2/20/08, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jai Harrison wrote:
Is this is what the effects of a difficult user interface in the GIMP are?
Different is not the same as difficult, it is just a different way of
working. It does not take a long time to get used to really, the same as
it take
By design, WINE is complete when it can replicate and translate all of
windows
programming system signals. By doing this, google will make the entire WINE
base a bit more stable, rather than less, which means this will probably
help
many more programs become more compatible than
That's excellent!! Or should I say, 'excrement'?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew
Macdonald-Wallace
Sent: 01 April 2007 09:51
To: British Ubuntu Talk
Subject: [ubuntu-uk] Google does it again...
Yet another stunner from Google
Yet another stunner from Google:
http://www.google.com/tisp/
M.
--
Matthew Macdonald-Wallace
Group Co-Ordinator
Thanet Linux User Group
http://www.thanet.lug.org.uk/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG KEY: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xFEA1BC16
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
Yet another stunner from Google:
http://www.google.com/tisp/
M.
You may jest ;-)
Check this out http://www.focuss.net/ - Not too far removed from the truth!!
Chris
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/
...and today's date is???
On 4/1/07, Matthew Macdonald-Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yet another stunner from Google:
http://www.google.com/tisp/
M.
--
Matthew Macdonald-Wallace
Group Co-Ordinator
Thanet Linux User Group
http://www.thanet.lug.org.uk/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG KEY:
Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote:
Yet another stunner from Google:
http://www.google.com/tisp/
M.
Heh, that was a good one. Better than last year?
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 09:51 +0100, Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote:
Yet another stunner from Google:
http://www.google.com/tisp/
It was only a matter of slime.
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/
Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote:
Yet another stunner from Google:
http://www.google.com/tisp/
M.
That's not bad for an april fools joke. Better than double yellow lines
the full length of the M6 motorway.
Ged.
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 12:16 +0100, Stephen Morrish wrote:
...and today's date is???
Indeed...
Is it international Top-Posting day? ;) [0]
Sarcasm and praise doesn't come across too well on email obviously! :)
Cheers,
M.
[0] Sorry, couldn't resist...!
--
Matthew Macdonald-Wallace
Group
TheVeech wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 09:51 +0100, Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote:
Yet another stunner from Google:
http://www.google.com/tisp/
It was only a matter of slime.
Nope. It's a flash in the pan... :@)
--
Blessings
Wulfmann
Wulf Credo:
Respect the elders.
101 - 158 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
