ubuntu.com
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:51:35
To: 'ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com'
Reply-To: UK Ubuntu Talk
Subject: [ubuntu-uk] Heres an idea (Was "Unity is not working")
Hi,
FWIW I have tried Unity and Xfce, KDE, GNOME 3, and have found all
wanting in some regards, but to say Uni
12 16:51:35
To: 'ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com'
Reply-To: UK Ubuntu Talk
Subject: [ubuntu-uk] Heres an idea (Was "Unity is not working")
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.
David Smith wrote:
> I have to agree with most being said about Unity and how it is such a
> jump from what we were used to.
Sure, but did you need to do it in yet another brand new thread?
> I understand the evolution of software, from one version to the next,
> but this felt like we were bein
On 22 February 2012 16:51, David Smith wrote:
> I have to agree with most being said about Unity and how it is such a jump
> from what we were used to. I understand the evolution of software, from one
> version to the next, but this felt like we were being forced to grow wings
> and webbed feet a
I am using xubuntu at the moment. Its very nice but takes a fair bit of
tweaking. However I like the ability to tweak and/or break haha.
Sent from my Desire HD
On Feb 22, 2012 4:50 PM, "David Smith" wrote:
> I have to agree with most being said about Unity and how it is such a jump
> from what w
I have to agree with most being said about Unity and how it is such a jump from
what we were used to. I understand the evolution of software, from one version
to the next, but this felt like we were being forced to grow wings and webbed
feet at the same time (no longer Linux for human beings).
