On 12/10/2007, Michael Holloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > The download speed sucked, must have been hammered yesterday because
> could
> > only get 75kbps...normally comes down at 7or 8 hundred.
> >
> > --
> > Kris Douglas
> > Softdel Limited Hosting Services
> >
> > Web: www.s
> The download speed sucked, must have been hammered yesterday because could
> only get 75kbps...normally comes down at 7or 8 hundred.
>
> --
> Kris Douglas
> Softdel Limited Hosting Services
>
> Web: www.softdel.net
> Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --
> ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
> h
On 12/10/2007, Michael Holloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 12:33 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 12:24 +0100, Michael Holloway wrote:
> >
> > > OUCH:
> > >
> > > "
> > > Could not install 'debconf'
> > >
> > > The upgrade will continue but the
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 12:24:00PM +0100, Michael Holloway wrote:
> OUCH:
>
> "
> Could not install 'debconf'
>
> The upgrade will continue but the 'debconf' package may not be in
> working state. Please consider submitting a bugreport about it.
>
> subprocess post-installation script killed by
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 11:13:07AM +0100, Dave Walker wrote:
> I suggested a minimal "/" and the bulk for "/home" to somebody a few
> months ago, and he had the argument that making them separate "Wasn't
> right for everybody". I'm not sure I can see how... but anyway - it
> makes me happy. Infac
> On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 12:33 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 12:24 +0100, Michael Holloway wrote:
>>
>> > OUCH:
>> >
>> > "
>> > Could not install 'debconf'
>> >
>> > The upgrade will continue but the 'debconf' package may not be in
>> > working state. Please consider su
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 12:33 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 12:24 +0100, Michael Holloway wrote:
>
> > OUCH:
> >
> > "
> > Could not install 'debconf'
> >
> > The upgrade will continue but the 'debconf' package may not be in
> > working state. Please consider submitting
Use "update-manager -c -d" over apt-get/aptitude, as it will perform
some other pre- and post- install procedures that apt won't do...
Regarding debconf, you'll probably be ok with the old version for the
time being (it's failed to install the new version, so your old
version is still intact). Lat
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 12:24 +0100, Michael Holloway wrote:
> OUCH:
>
> "
> Could not install 'debconf'
>
> The upgrade will continue but the 'debconf' package may not be in
> working state. Please consider submitting a bugreport about it.
>
> subprocess post-installation script killed by s
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 12:08 +0100, Tony Arnold wrote:
> Michael,
>
> On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 11:57 +0100, Michael Holloway wrote:
>
> > Well I've just double backed up everything, and started the upgrade
> > process!!! Wish me luck!
>
OUCH:
"
Could not install 'debconf'
The upgrade will continu
Michael,
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 11:57 +0100, Michael Holloway wrote:
> Well I've just double backed up everything, and started the upgrade
> process!!! Wish me luck!
Good luck. My D.820 upgrade is progressing as I type!
> Is it sad that im really excited about a new linux I would never
> te
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 11:11 +0100, Tony Arnold wrote:
> Michael,
>
> On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 09:12 +0100, Michael Holloway wrote:
> > Has anyone done it yet... i'm sooo tempted, and with RC being released
> > today, i figure why not.
>
> I did up an upgrade yesterday using upgrade-manager -d on my
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 10:31 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
> Hi Pete,
>
> On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 10:03 +0100, Pete Stean wrote:
> > Can I suggest that you put your /home (where you have all your work
> > and play files) on a separate physical partition or indeed on a
> > separate disk from the main os
>
Michael,
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 09:12 +0100, Michael Holloway wrote:
> Has anyone done it yet... i'm sooo tempted, and with RC being released
> today, i figure why not.
I did up an upgrade yesterday using upgrade-manager -d on my 5 year old
Dell Latitude C.400 laptop! It took about 4 hours all tog
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 10:31 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
> Hi Pete,
>
> On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 10:03 +0100, Pete Stean wrote:
> > Can I suggest that you put your /home (where you have all your work
> > and play files) on a separate physical partition or indeed on a
> > separate disk from the main os
>
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 09:12 +0100, Michael Holloway wrote:
> Has anyone done it yet... i'm sooo tempted, and with RC being released
> today, i figure why not.
I have used the apt-get dist-upgrade method on one server. I used the
"gksu update-manager -d" method on 5 machines and for 4 it worke
Hi Pete,
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 10:03 +0100, Pete Stean wrote:
> Can I suggest that you put your /home (where you have all your work
> and play files) on a separate physical partition or indeed on a
> separate disk from the main os
I agree. I only recently started doing this with one machine, and
Can I suggest that you put your /home (where you have all your work
and play files) on a separate physical partition or indeed on a
separate disk from the main os
I have my system set up like that and it doesn't matter what I do to
bork the installation because all my personal files are safely
els
Michael Holloway wrote:
> Has anyone done it yet... i'm sooo tempted, and with RC being released
> today, i figure why not.
>
> But then i do have ALL my work and play on this machine. If I'm going to
> go through all the backing up etc when there might still be a problem...
> i might as well wait
Has anyone done it yet... i'm sooo tempted, and with RC being released
today, i figure why not.
But then i do have ALL my work and play on this machine. If I'm going to
go through all the backing up etc when there might still be a problem...
i might as well wait for 1 more week for the stable rele
20 matches
Mail list logo
