On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 11/07/2013 05:07 PM, Jono Bacon wrote:
>> I don't think is trademark law to silence a critic. I think it is
>> trademark law to protect a trademark.
>
> Seems more likely to be inadequate staff lawyer supervision to me. If
> you leave the co
I think in order to fully understand this issue, we need to see all sides
of the story, and not a blog post of one of the people involved in the
event taking place. This email is a re-tweet from someone who is largely
very anti Canonical, This list needs to find a way to get a clear and
concise und
Darn phone keyboard: "non-English"
On Nov 8, 2013 10:19 AM, "Peter Sullivan" wrote:
> Also just as a legal aside, Ubuntu is _actually_ a real word in a real
> living language. As such no court in any country on God's Green Earth would
> do more than merely laugh the case out as it has no merit.
>
Also just as a legal aside, Ubuntu is _actually_ a real word in a real
living language. As such no court in any country on God's Green Earth would
do more than merely laugh the case out as it has no merit.
I name a distro 'community' and trademark it (not likely but if I use a no
my English equival
This is no way to promote Free (as in freedom) Software. Then again
Shuttleworth seems to have lost the narrative thread of Free Software. When
the project began he used to talk about promoting Free Software all the
time. Now? Not at all.
Ubuntu to you,
Drew
On Nov 8, 2013 4:00 AM, wrote:
> Sen
On 11/07/2013 05:07 PM, Jono Bacon wrote:
> I don't think is trademark law to silence a critic. I think it is
> trademark law to protect a trademark.
Seems more likely to be inadequate staff lawyer supervision to me. If
you leave the corporate lawyers to their own devices, they get into all
kinds
