Gentlemen; please. This is a minor disagreement that is distracting from
the main issue. We know that AMD have not yet released drivers for a set
of older cards that work with Quantal (or more specifically, xserver
1.13). Let's focus on that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are
I'd like to point out that the makson96 PPA is non-optimal as it
downgrades X to 1.12.
(As a side note, is there an important difference between does not
support and not working with that I'm missing?)
** Description changed:
Following the AMD decision to change to a new driver support model
This is OT for the bug report, but prior to the new 9.00 release I put
together an archive with the 1.12 debs for amd64:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=12263935postcount=70
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to fglrx-installer
Public bug reported:
Following the AMD decision to drop support for older hardware fglrx-
installer will install non-working drivers for some users.
I suggest the addition of an fglrx-legacy package to install the AMD
legacy drivers for users with older cards.
Output for fglrx 9.00 [1]:
#
@34 This is an issue with legacy (HD2000-4000) cards being unsupported
by the latest Catalyst/fglrx releases. Those cards need the legacy
release drivers which at the moment are based on Catalyst 12.6.
Unfortunately these also don't support xserver 1.13.
I've filed a separate bug for this:
Loving it! 2:9.000-0ubuntu1 is working great for me with xserver-xorg-
core 2:1.13.0-0ubuntu4. :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032672
Title:
fglrx-updates broken
There's nothing that can be done until AMD release a driver that is
compatible with xserver 1.13. Until then we have to either:
1) Live with the open-source driver
2) Downgrade to xserver 1.11 from precise or 1.12 from Launchpad's quantal
builds
3) Find a patch that provides 1.13 compatibility.
@Shabang: Check out the thread on ubuntuforums:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=12090910postcount=26
There's also a new patch for kernel 3.5 which works for me (credited to
Enrico Tagliavini).
** Patch added: 3.5-do_mmap.patch
New patch from http://ati.cchtml.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495 added by
Zenitur
(Testing on my system with AMD driver is in progress ;)
** Patch added: patch_to_fix_compiling_fglrx_12.4_with_linux_3.4.patch
Using only the patch from #6 fglrx builds and X loads. glxinfo reports
info as expected (as far as I can tell ;). Unity3D starts.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993427
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 993427 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993427
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 993427
fglrx 2:8.960-0ubuntu1: fglrx kernel module failed to build [error:
‘cpu_possible_map’ undeclared (first use in this function)]
--
You received this
Public bug reported:
Apport report. fglrx 8.960 fails to build with kernel 3.4.0-1-generic.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: fglrx 2:8.960-0ubuntu1
Uname: Linux 3.3.0-4.dmz.1-liquorix-amd64 x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
Architecture:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993427
Title:
fglrx 2:8.960-0ubuntu1: fglrx kernel module failed to build
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Possible patch taken from:
http://phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?68922-Patch-to-compile-fgrlx-
module-on-Linux-3-3-rc4-with-x86-32-bit-archp=257809#post257809
** Patch added: 34.patch
I'd love a build in the PPA for Precise. ;)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/763005
Title:
Compiz's Sync to Vblank makes display stutter/slow with some drivers
(like
xserver 1.10 issues still present with Catalyst 11.3 (fglrx 8.831.2) -
more's the pity.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709505
Title:
[MASTER] fglrx failed to
Public bug reported:
fglrx 8.783 fails to build on kernel 2.6.37 on Natty. Patches are
available and I've walked through the changes here:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1615594
** Affects: fglrx-installer (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
fglrx fails to
** Patch added: sema_init.patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672127/+attachment/1725751/+files/sema_init.patch
--
fglrx fails to build on kernel = 2.6.37
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672127
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to
Already fixed in fglrx-installer 2:8.780-0ubuntu2. Alberto is amazing.
** Changed in: fglrx-installer (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
fglrx fails to build on kernel = 2.6.36
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646237
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Package is here: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/+source/fglrx-
installer/2:8.780-0ubuntu1
It should show up when you update (it's currently downloading on mine
right now).
--
[MASTER] fglrx does not build on 2.6.33 kernel and higher
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573748
You received
Public bug reported:
fglrx fails to build for kernel 2.6.36. Patches exist already for the
two files (firegl_public.c and kcl_ioctl.c) to get this working.
Attached are patches adapted from Arch
(http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29111) and from Alexander
Avdoshin
** Patch added: arch_compat_2.6.36.patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/646237/+attachment/1628070/+files/arch_compat_2.6.36.patch
--
fglrx fails to build on kernel = 2.6.36
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646237
You received this bug notification because you
** Patch added: firegl_public_2.6.36.patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/646237/+attachment/1628069/+files/firegl_public_2.6.36.patch
--
fglrx fails to build on kernel = 2.6.36
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646237
You received this bug notification because
This archive contains pre-patched files in case the above patches are
wrong (or someone wants to just copy them to /usr/src/fglrx-8.780 and
trigger DKMS)
** Attachment added: Full files for kernel 2.6.36.tar.bz2
Yes for amd64: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-
installer/2:8.780-0ubuntu1/+build/1971749
On 23 September 2010 19:28, Brett Alton brett.jr.al...@gmail.com wrote:
No 64-bit build?
2:8.780-0ubuntu1: i386
2:8.723.1-0ubuntu4: amd64
--
[MASTER] fglrx does not build on 2.6.33 kernel
fglrx is broken with Xorg 7.6 and server 1.9. We wait on AMD to
deliver something that's compatible with Maverick. :D
Everything should be fine on Lucid with the Mainline kernel, however.
--
[MASTER] fglrx does not build on 2.6.33 kernel and higher
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573748
You
Catalyst 10.7 has been released and this builds correctly on 2.6.35-11
(no patching or fiddling required).
--
[MASTER] fglrx does not build on 2.6.33 kernel and higher
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573748
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is
More information based around my testing:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1510376
Essentially one change is needed to one file for =2.6.34 as Catalyst
10.6 supports 2.6.33. This is accomplished by fglrx-2.6.34-rc4.patch
though it may be easier to just change the file (I'm surprised ATi
Robert's latest fglrx packages in X-Swat work perfectly with both .34
and .35 kernels.
--
fglrx does not build on 2.6.34 kernel (Patch files available)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573748
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to
Robert, your package doesn't successfully apply the arch patch (I think
it's down to your regexp for PATCH_MATCH; if I can find a way to report
a bug on your package I will ;) I'm also pretty sure you need both .33
and .34 patches for a .34 kernel.
I've attached a dkms.conf that will allow the
Public bug reported:
This may not be the best place to put this but I have adapted patches
from Arch (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29111) and the fglrx
dkms.conf to get fglrx to build.
As a workaround it might help someone - I'm aware .34 kernels aren't
official packages (yet!).
** Patch added: fglrx-2.6.33.patch
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47283838/fglrx-2.6.33.patch
--
fglrx does not build on 2.6.34 kernel (Patch files available)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573748
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to
** Attachment added: dkms.conf changed to include patches for .34 kernel
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47283548/dkms.conf
--
fglrx does not build on 2.6.34 kernel (Patch files available)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573748
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Patch added: fglrx-2.6.34-rc4.patch
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47284176/fglrx-2.6.34-rc4.patch
** Description changed:
This may not be the best place to put this but I have adapted patches
from Arch (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29111) and the fglrx
dkms.conf to get
34 matches
Mail list logo
