[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 532676] Re: [r300] mouse cursor disappears after xrandr change

2010-03-09 Thread Marien Zwart
And I can no longer reproduce this using linux-image-2.6.32-16-generic 2.6.32-16.24 (now in main) either, which (if I read the changelog right) has the same DRM backport. Closing this as fixed, thanks! ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- [r

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 532676] Re: [r300] mouse cursor disappears after xrandr change

2010-03-06 Thread Marien Zwart
I cannot reproduce the problem using the kernel from that PPA. -- [r300] mouse cursor disappears after xrandr change https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in ubuntu. __

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 532676] Re: [r300] mouse cursor disappears after xrandr change

2010-03-05 Thread Marien Zwart
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40251105/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40251106/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40251107/Dependencies.txt ** A

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 532676] [NEW] [r300] mouse cursor disappears after xrandr change

2010-03-05 Thread Marien Zwart
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-ati My ubuntu lucid system with a radeon 9600 xt (r300 driver) using kms loses its mouse cursor if I change the refresh frequency through xrandr. Certain actions bring it back (I've been using the animated workspace switch in compiz, bu

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 415964] Re: [KM400]xv does not work (badalloc, using the x-updates ppa)

2009-10-07 Thread Marien Zwart
Sorry for losing track of this. The version of openchrome in karmic (xserver-xorg-video-openchrome-0.2.903+svn758-0ubuntu1) is still affected by this. Upgrading that package to r800 fixed it. So this is indeed fixed upstream, and it might be nice to get a newer snapshot in the xorg-updates ppa or e

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 415964] Re: [KM400]xv does not work (badalloc, using the x-updates ppa)

2009-08-20 Thread Marien Zwart
I haven't been able to get a logfile out yet. I can confirm it "will not work correctly": I'm seeing some old video memory contents with some corruption drawn on top of it, and then the system locks. Not just X: magic sysrq and ctrl+alt+del do not work, and my ssh connection dies. Neither Xorg.0.lo

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 415964] Re: xv does not work (badalloc, using the x-updates ppa)

2009-08-20 Thread Marien Zwart
This is going to sound pretty dumb, but how do I get the driver to use a resolution different from the native panel resolution? Both the driver from the .ppa and current svn head (revision 777) with the patch applied log "ViaPanelGetIndex: Mode not supported by Panel." or "ViaPanelGetIndex: Non-na

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 415964] Re: xv does not work (badalloc, using the x-updates ppa)

2009-08-19 Thread Marien Zwart
Yes, that patch (applied to the source package from the x-updates ppa) still gives me working xv. Note via_swov.c:Upd_Video still uses NativeMode->Width, but I don't know if it's actually possible to trigger that code, or what would happen if it got a 0 width (dwWidth would be set to 0, but I don't

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 415964] Re: xv does not work (badalloc, using the x-updates ppa)

2009-08-19 Thread Marien Zwart
** Attachment added: "very ugly but working patch" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30508577/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.903%2Bsvn741-1build1.diff -- xv does not work (badalloc, using the x-updates ppa) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415964 You received this bug notification because you

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 415964] [NEW] xv does not work (badalloc, using the x-updates ppa)

2009-08-19 Thread Marien Zwart
Public bug reported: I have an acer aspire 1350 laptop with (from lspci -nn): 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: VIA Technologies, Inc. KM400/KN400/P4M800 [S3 UniChrome] [1106:7205] (rev 01) Using jaunty it needs the x-updates ppa for X to start at all (at least without an xorg.conf). Wi