[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 589485]

2018-12-19 Thread Tfa7
(In reply to main.haarp from comment #31) > Do you happen to have a more recent patch? 1.19.3: http://git.altlinux.org/gears/x/xorg-server.git?p=xorg- server.git;a=commitdiff;h=c5b77a90d7e0d6a1874fcb545969f355d1ed0293 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 589485]

2018-12-19 Thread Tfa7
FWIW we've patched xorg-server in the distribution. Shame on those breaking base functionality instead of fixing their crap! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589485 Title:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 589485]

2014-10-03 Thread Tfa7
ping -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589485 Title: Ignores physical display size and calculates based on 96DPI To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 589485]

2013-07-04 Thread Tfa7
It dawned on me that a proposed replacement might lack such an, um, feature of hardwired 96 dpi. Now if that will be called progress I'll invest some time into finding those who arranged that and ruining their remnants of reputation. (creating and improving is vastly more important but the

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 589485]

2013-06-27 Thread Tfa7
(In reply to comment #14) See also https://help.ubuntu.com/community/AsusZenbook#LCD Heh, UX31A I'm typing this at has 166 dpi. Those who forced the 96dpi kludge into xorg should be forced to walk in my shoes till the end of their lives with no chance to change those. -- You received this bug

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 589485]

2013-06-27 Thread Tfa7
(In reply to comment #16) See http://pastebin.com/vtzyBK6e for #xorg-devel discussion about this. Some comments: ohsix not a lot of people are bothered, since getting the per display dpi right is a hard problem, even if you can set it for one single monitor in particular, 'fixed' is handling

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1043575]

2013-03-26 Thread Tfa7
Still in 1.14.0, spoils similar icewm themes as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043575 Title: Xubuntu 12.10 + Xorg server 1.13 = Window decoration missing To

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 521877]

2012-08-22 Thread Tfa7
(In reply to comment #20) It was chosen in order to make display of web pages using Xorg more consistent with the way they get displayed on Windows, which by default assumes 96. It's called bug compatibility, and there's a knob in a browser for that already. -- 1400x1050@122,

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 589485]

2012-08-22 Thread Tfa7
May the so called developers with I know better attitude be treated by physicists with the same attitude! They broke the thing for BUG compatibility with an obsolete piece of crap for a single use case already handled in corresponding application (a web browser), they told us to go sink in the